LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,224
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #2,621
That's insane LA would lose a team in the first place if there's enough audience for two teams.Your thread is St Louis is moving to LA, not either them or the chargers.
dude i been saying the past year and half it will be the rams and chargers after i found out a few months after i made this thread they are pushing for two teams.
roger goodel told st louis their stadium plan wont work.which was a major slap in the face to st louis.
kroneke is the only owner of the three that can afford the huge relocation fee of 550 mill.
Tell me what number post you mentioned the chargers. Was it page 1 or 260?
again like I said,when i first created this thread back then,I only had knowledge of the Rams coming back,wasnt till months later that i learned they were pushing for two teams.
The RAMS are a 100% done deal,Kroneke has the law on his side,chargers again are 50/50 dont know for sure.some of the owners are opposed to having two teams so we wont know for sure till the week after the superbowl is what i been hearing.
again read the link in post# 2616 that is just one of many articles i have posted here that it could very well be rams and chargers in the hundreds of pages on this thread.lol
Rams are a 100% lock, chargers are just speculation,dont know for sure on that one,wont know until l after the superbowl if chargers are coming as well or not.
I wish Michigan up by Lansing and grand rapids would start football and basketball teams. But they must not be big enough markets like St. Louis or Alabama.
well me and you know its insane to bring two teams into the LA market but as you know,the NFL is run by a bunch of idiots who dont know better that LA wont support more than one team,the Rams.
they are too stupid to understand that LA already has USC and UCLA football so that bringing in another team other than the Rams that have the history and tradition is very risky and unwise.
The Rams were SUPPOSE to be coming to LA in 2015 but once kroneke make the announcement he was going to relocate the Rams to LA,spanos had a fit because the idiot thinks the LA market is his and belongs to him so that was the result of the delay to LA and it being put off for one more year.
here is the proof that neither the Rams or chargers were ever embraced when they were in LA like the Rams were.
The first year the Chargers came into the NFL,their first year they played inLA.that was why they moved to san diego was because they could not compete with the Rams in attendance while there. Even though they finished that season with an 8-4 record and made it to the playoffs,their average crowds were just around 22,000. FACT.
The Rams that same year finished the season with the opposite record of 4-8. Even though they had a losing season,they STILL averaged crowds of around 72,000. you can look it up yourself,sounds like a city with heart fro their team to me.
Also the year the Raiders won the superbowl out there in LA,the very next year for their home opener they only drew a small measly crowd of just 46,269 there.
what did the Rams draw that same season? 65,403 of a standing room only crowd which was pretty impressive itself since they were playing in a baseball stadium..
The Oakland Raiders might have won a superbowl out there in LA but nobody in LA cared,they did not care because LA only cares about the Rams,nobody else.
The city of LA DOES have passion and heart for football,but only for the Rams,nobody else obviously.
Last edited:
