The problem comes from assuming there is only one definition for these words. Equality for some means that everybody gets the same lunch. Equality for others means that everybody gets the lunch they like or need. And equality for others means that everybody has the ability to acquire lunch. And others equality means that everybody has the right to make the most of their talent, ability, aptitude or whatever toward the goal of buying a lunch.I'm sure most people have seen the cartoon meant to illustrate the similarity/difference between equality and equity. It seems to get people worked up. Now, I don't want anyone to lose their shit over this, but I recently saw another version of this cartoon, and I thought I'd share it. I'm sure it can be discussed without falling back into the usual hate-fest and/or racist diatribe, so here goes:
View attachment 1180763
Then you get into the issue of equity and all the arguments of whether that can be achieved when contribution or participation by others is required to achieve it or whether standards of achievement are lowered in order to give the illusion of equity.
Taking away the fence is not liberating. It is dumb as it forces change in a fundamental characteristic of the game of baseball enjoyed by millions to benefit a very few (entitlement). And it eliminates the ability to raise revenue by those who sell tickets to make the game possible.
Everybody wearing the same shirt is not inclusion but is rather identifying and that can frequently be divisive.
Last edited: