Excellent News: Trump Appointed Judge Rejects Biden Administration's LGBT Health Protections

[MAGA Macho Man]

Another win for President Trump. Morality and Decency wins out over evil. About the judge.

Matthew Kacsmaryk - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

[He has worked on religious liberty cases opposing certain LGBT protections in housing, employment and health care. He has referred to homosexuality as "disordered", and to being transgender as a "delusion" and a "mental disorder"]

U.S. judge rejects Biden administration's LGBT health protections

A federal judge in Texas ruled on Friday that President Joe Biden's administration had wrongly interpreted an Obamacare provision as barring health care providers from discriminating against gay and t...

news.yahoo.com

 

[otto105]

Another win for President Trump. Morality and Decency wins out over evil. About the judge.

Matthew Kacsmaryk - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

[He has worked on religious liberty cases opposing certain LGBT protections in housing, employment and health care. He has referred to homosexuality as "disordered", and to being transgender as a "delusion" and a "mental disorder"]

U.S. judge rejects Biden administration's LGBT health protections

A federal judge in Texas ruled on Friday that President Joe Biden's administration had wrongly interpreted an Obamacare provision as barring health care providers from discriminating against gay and t...

news.yahoo.com

Will be overturned.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Will be overturned.

Based on what?

 

[White 6]

Another win for President Trump. Morality and Decency wins out over evil. About the judge.

Matthew Kacsmaryk - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

[He has worked on religious liberty cases opposing certain LGBT protections in housing, employment and health care. He has referred to homosexuality as "disordered", and to being transgender as a "delusion" and a "mental disorder"]

U.S. judge rejects Biden administration's LGBT health protections

A federal judge in Texas ruled on Friday that President Joe Biden's administration had wrongly interpreted an Obamacare provision as barring health care providers from discriminating against gay and t...

news.yahoo.com

You are celebrating a judge saying on the court record, that it is OK to discriminate in the workplace and in healthcare, against gay people and the transgender nut-balls?

What kind of person would be in favor of discrimination in healthcare or the work place? I am not gay and certainly not transgender, but he ought to leave these people alone. I have nothing against gay people, as long as not trying to be gay with me, and think the trans people have enough problems without a federal judge pronouncing it, OK to discriminate in healthcare and where they work. Discrimination gets a bad rap, because it is generally bad.

 

[DGS49]

Can't you see the difference between (a) whether this would be a nice policy, and (b) whether the law actually says that?

What if a doctor or a clinic decided they would not treat anyone over 400 pounds? "If they let themselves get that fat, they have a death wish and we don't want to waste our time on them." Would it be a good idea to prohibit doctors from doing that? Maybe. But to take an existing law that is silent on the issue and "interpret it" to prohibit such discrimination is a step too far.

Discriminating on the basis of gender identity or homosexuality is probably a bad idea, but the law doesn't address it. If Congress wants to modify the law, they can do that. Otherwise, it is what it is.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

You are celebrating a judge saying on the court record, that it is OK to discriminate in the workplace and in healthcare, against gay people and the transgender nut-balls?

What kind of person would be in favor of discrimination in healthcare or the work place? I am not gay and certainly not transgender, but he ought to leave these people alone. I have nothing against gay people, as long as not trying to be gay with me, and think the trans people have enough problems without a federal judge pronouncing it, OK to discriminate in healthcare and where they work. Discrimination gets a bad rap, because it is generally bad.

You damned right I'm for discrimination against homosexuals in the workplace and beyond. They spread disease and have a mental disorder. They're also pedophiles who prey upon children. That's why they want same sex marriage so they can adopt and sexually abuse children growing up.

 

[busybee01]

Another win for President Trump. Morality and Decency wins out over evil. About the judge.

Matthew Kacsmaryk - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

[He has worked on religious liberty cases opposing certain LGBT protections in housing, employment and health care. He has referred to homosexuality as "disordered", and to being transgender as a "delusion" and a "mental disorder"]

U.S. judge rejects Biden administration's LGBT health protections

A federal judge in Texas ruled on Friday that President Joe Biden's administration had wrongly interpreted an Obamacare provision as barring health care providers from discriminating against gay and t...

news.yahoo.com

He clearly should have recused himself as he is biased. This is a typical right wing Trump judge. You have no right to impose your so-called morality on others. You are thge one who is evil. Jesus Christ said to love your fellow man. He didn't make any exceptions.

 

[busybee01]

Based on what?

It should be overturned because it is discrimination against others.

 

[Resnic]

You are celebrating a judge saying on the court record, that it is OK to discriminate in the workplace and in healthcare, against gay people and the transgender nut-balls?

What kind of person would be in favor of discrimination in healthcare or the work place? I am not gay and certainly not transgender, but he ought to leave these people alone. I have nothing against gay people, as long as not trying to be gay with me, and think the trans people have enough problems without a federal judge pronouncing it, OK to discriminate in healthcare and where they work. Discrimination gets a bad rap, because it is generally bad.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Amarillo ruled that a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2020 holding that a law barring workplace discrimination protects gay and transgender employees did not apply to the healthcare law.

Now read the last 7 words. Gays and trannies have nothing to do with healthcare. It isn't discrimination against anyone. Healthcare is a human thing, not a man and woman thing, or a straight or gay thing, not even a freakzoid tranny thing. Healthcare is about human beings. Tranny's and fags don't deserve any less or anymore than anyone else and shouldn't be protected above or below anyone else.

Workplace discrimination has absolutely nothing at all in any way, shape, or form to do with healthcare.

Might want to go get some ibuprofen for that muscle you pulled patting yourself on the back for championing your moral high ground based off not actually knowing what you're talking about.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

You have no right to impose your so-called morality on others.

Yes we do!

 

[Grumblenuts]

Gays and trannies have nothing to do with healthcare. It isn't discrimination against anyone. Healthcare is a human thing, not a man and woman thing, or a straight or gay thing, not even a freakzoid tranny thing. Healthcare is about human beings. Tranny's and fags don't deserve any less or anymore than anyone else and shouldn't be protected above or below anyone else.

Workplace discrimination has absolutely nothing at all in any way, shape, or form to do with healthcare.

Read and weep, haters:

Discrimination and Harassment in the Workplace

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces federal laws prohibiting discrimination against a job applicant or an employee during a variety of work situations.

www.ncsl.org

Protections Against Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity

In July 2022, a federal district court preliminarily enjoined the EEOC from implementing this document as to plaintiffs in Tennessee. et al. v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ. et al., Case No. 3:21-cv-308 (E.D. Tenn.).

www.eeoc.gov

4. Does Title VII protect employees who work in places where state or local law does not prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity?

Yes. As a federal law, Title VII applies nationwide and protects employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity regardless of state or local laws.

5. What kind of discriminatory employment actions does Title VII prohibit?

Title VII includes a broad range of protections. Among other things, under Title VII employers cannot discriminate against individuals based on sexual orientation or gender identity with respect to:

• hiring
• firing, furloughs, or reductions in force
• promotions
• demotions
• discipline
• training
• work assignments
• pay, overtime, or other compensation
• fringe benefits
• other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.

Discrimination also includes severe or pervasive harassment. It is unlawful for an employer to create or tolerate such harassment based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Further, if an employee reports such harassment by a customer or client, the employer must take steps to stop the harassment and prevent it from happening again. For more information, visit the EEOC’s harassment page at Harassment.

6. Are non-LGBTQ+ job applicants and employees also protected against sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination?

Yes—employers are not allowed to discriminate against job applicants or employees because the applicants or employees are, for example, straight or cisgender (someone whose gender identity corresponds with the sex assigned at birth). Title VII prohibits harassment and other forms of discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Read and weep, haters:

Discrimination and Harassment in the Workplace

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces federal laws prohibiting discrimination against a job applicant or an employee during a variety of work situations.

www.ncsl.org

Protections Against Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity

In July 2022, a federal district court preliminarily enjoined the EEOC from implementing this document as to plaintiffs in Tennessee. et al. v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ. et al., Case No. 3:21-cv-308 (E.D. Tenn.).

www.eeoc.gov

Are you a homosexual supporter and their lifestyle?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Are you a homosexual supporter and their lifestyle?

Have any friends? Family? Coworkers?

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Have any friends? Family? Coworkers?

Ever thought about going to the middle east for a roof top party with some Muslims?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Ever thought about going to the middle east for a roof top party with some Muslims?

So that would be a "No." Didn't think so. What a shame.

 

[Stann]

Another win for President Trump. Morality and Decency wins out over evil. About the judge.

Matthew Kacsmaryk - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

[He has worked on religious liberty cases opposing certain LGBT protections in housing, employment and health care. He has referred to homosexuality as "disordered", and to being transgender as a "delusion" and a "mental disorder"]

U.S. judge rejects Biden administration's LGBT health protections

A federal judge in Texas ruled on Friday that President Joe Biden's administration had wrongly interpreted an Obamacare provision as barring health care providers from discriminating against gay and t...

news.yahoo.com

You believe this has anything with morality and decency. It's quite the opposite. Hatred and bigotry have no place in GOD's kingdom.

 

[OKTexas]

He clearly should have recused himself as he is biased. This is a typical right wing Trump judge. You have no right to impose your so-called morality on others. You are thge one who is evil. Jesus Christ said to love your fellow man. He didn't make any exceptions.

Didn't read the link did ya commie, there was no mention of morality, just citations of the law and supreme court precedent.

.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Didn't read the link did ya commie, there was no mention of morality, just citations of the law and supreme court precedent.

.

Thank you!

 

[Stann]

Didn't read the link did ya commie, there was no mention of morality, just citations of the law and supreme court precedent.

.

And why was this action necessary ? Hatred and bigotry backed it.

 

[Stann]

Didn't read the link did ya commie, there was no mention of morality, just citations of the law and supreme court precedent.

.

This coming from a judge who defended the bakery that turned a great a gay couple during pride week, the judge who called transgender a delusion, called homosexuals disordered, is both an active anti-LGBTQ activist and is a religious hardliner. All this was mentioned in the references in the article. This judge clearly should have recused himself from many many cases involving anyone that's a little bit different than he is. He obviously has a lot of hatred and bigotry wrapped up in his religious beliefs.