Evidence that universe created itself

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I see your logic...
If it's on the web and it agrees with you, it's good.
If it's on the web and it doesn't agree with you, it's stupid.

No, that is the non sequitur (not that you have any idea what that is) you just invented to soothe yourself, because you know less than nothing about any of this and have no tools in your toolbox to make any valid points. You probably should not even be commenting in the science section of the board at all.

 

[Indeependent]

All the videos I found were by non-scientists so I think you've already cherry picked. Would you respect the views on religion of an atheist?

You're trying to crawl your way out of a hole.
Every word and sentence must be examined and what id not stated must be explored as to why not.
I searched for Carbon Dating and everyone of them explained that the half-life of Carbon-144 is over 5,000 years.
What kind of bullshit is that?
Most of them stated that it was subjective and the rest did not mention that it was objective.

 

[alang1216]

C-14 is only good for 50,000 years so are you saying we live on a young Earth?

It's way older than 6,000 I have no doubt.

It doesn't track back to calendar years either.

Not sure what that means? It gives a range of time before the present that tracks to a specific span of years.

 

[alang1216]

I searched for Carbon Dating and everyone of them explained that the half-life of Carbon-144 is over 5,000 years.
What kind of bullshit is that?

That 'bullshit' is called physics. There are several methods to determine half-life, you don't have to wait 5,000 years to measure it.

 

[Blues Man]

Inuits’ vitamin D intake wasn’t dependent upon the sun. They get all that they need from their diet, heavy on types of fatty fish that are naturally rich in vitamin D.

It isn't just one thing that is responsible for the difference in skin shades among humans.

And as the Smithsonian article explained Europeans were darker skinned for much longer than previously thought.

 

[Blues Man]

Another reason is that we just have not been around very long.

2 to 3 hundred thousands years isn't a long time when you consider the earth is over 4 billion years old

 

[james bond]

It's way older than 6,000 I have no doubt.

Not sure what that means? It gives a range of time before the present that tracks to a specific span of years.

About how old? Or how young?

Radiometric dating has assumptions that no one can know. Do you need to know what they are (meaning you don't know radiometric dating)?

 

[Innocynioc]

As I understand it at first there was absolutely nothing. Then something happened to nothing that caused it to become something. That something became everything. I'm hoping that Santa Claus will bring me a book that will explain this in more detail.

 

[alang1216]

About how old? Or how young?

Radiometric dating has assumptions that no one can know. Do you need to know what they are (meaning you don't know radiometric dating)?

It makes the same assumptions as all sciences make: the physical laws we observe today are the same laws that existed from the beginning. If your God changed these laws in the past, radiometric dating would be useless. Fortunately there is no evidence (outside of religions) that this has happened.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

2 to 3 hundred thousands years isn't a long time when you consider the earth is over 4 billion years old

Yep. And what is that...maybe 10,000 generations?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

As I understand it at first there was absolutely nothing.

Wow... Have you published your work on this? Scientists arent sure this was the case...but surely you could convince them with your research.

 

[Hollie]

About how old? Or how young?

Radiometric dating has assumptions that no one can know. Do you need to know what they are (meaning you don't know radiometric dating)?

Not surprisingly, you can't identify any of the 'assumptions' you claim. Neither can the charlatans at AIG.

 

[Indeependent]

That 'bullshit' is called physics. There are several methods to determine half-life, you don't have to wait 5,000 years to measure it.

The Science of Chemistry....

Let's call out the bullshit using real life examples that you will, as a LibBot, dismiss without a thought...

Medications...
They are the result of science!
But they come with 1,000 warnings that will kill you or cause permanent disabilities.
Yep! That's science!
Because the results of Organic Chemistry are subjective.

Medical Procedures...
They are the result of science!
But you have to sign papers that if you die or suffer permanent disabilities from the Medical Procedure, you can stuff your complaints up your ass.
Yep! That's science!
Because the results of playing with the Organic Chemistry of a living being are subjective.

Did you know that there's not one scientist working on a medication who knows why the medications works?
I'm related to one and I know 2 people in town who worked for 40 years each for well known pharmaceutical companies.

Viagra for instance, was intended to help people with low pressure and it was a massive 15 year failure.
Then a subject who took it for low pressure reported that he had the best sex of his life.

Then every other pharmaceutical company paid to use variants and and industry grew from a mistake.

Lipitor...
Pure fucking poison for 100% of people who take it.
It causes arthritis, and MDs, you know, scientists, prescribe it like candy; almost everyone I meet who complains about sudden toe, finger or limb paralysis just started taking Lipitor.
Because, well...science.

So the next time I hear about the half life of a molecule being thousands of years long I have to laugh my ass off.

Because...science!

What is it really called?
An Agenda.
Individuals spend millions of not so hard earned money to push an agenda.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Medications...
They are the result of science!
But they come with 1,000 warnings that will kill you or cause permanent disabilities.
Yep! That's science!
Because the results of Organic Chemistry are subjective

That's the dumbest thing i have ever read. That's as objective as objective gets.

 

[Indeependent]

That's the dumbest thing i have ever read. That's as objective as objective gets.

That's because you're an idiot with an agenda.
I see you didn't address any of my specific points because you would never have an erection ever again.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That's because you're an idiot with an agenda.
I see you didn't address any of my specific points because you would never have an erection ever again.

I sure did. I directly addressed your very stupid and wrong comments about medicine and organic chemistry. The scientific process of analyzing the benefits and side effects of medicine is as objective as objective gets. Modern scientific medicine is one of the top triumphs of the human race. Precisely because of the objectivity of scientific process.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Indeependent is just performing iteration number 5 billion of the same, tired religioner exercise:

Unable to elevate his own faith based beliefs above "because I said so", he is trying to drag hard-earned, objective knowledge into the shitty muck where his faith-based belief resides. He wants them to go on the same shelf, but he has no evidence or good argument for his faith based beliefs. So he is left no choice but to prop up garbage like, "science is all subjective", etc. He is just trying to vandalize his neighbor's house, in order to make his own house look better.

 

[Indeependent]

I sure did. I directly addressed your very stupid and wrong comments about medicine and organic chemistry. The scientific process of analyzing the benefits and side effects of medicine is as objective as objective gets. Modern scientific medicine is one of the top triumphs of the human race. Precisely because of the objectivity of scientific process.

You're a fucking idiot who obviously doesn't listen to commercials or pay attention to the forms you have to sign before a medical procedure and you obviously have never met a chemist or physicist who actually worked for a drug company, so stuff your idiocy up your ass.

objective as it gets
Do you know what a lethal % is that prevent a medication or procedure from reaching market?
I bet you don't.
Answer right now so we'll all know you know nothing.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You're a fucking idiot who obviously doesn't listen to commercials or pay attention to the forms you have to sign before a medical procedure and you obviously have never met a chemist or physicist who actually worked for a drug company, so stuff your idiocy up your ass.

objective as it gets
Do you know what a lethal % is that prevent a medication or procedure from reaching market?
I bet you don't.
Answer right now so we'll all know you know nothing.

None of that argues the science is objective. What are you smokin', old man?

 

[Indeependent]

None of that argues the science is objective. What are you smokin', old man?

The definition of Objective in the medical world is >50% of people don't get ill or die.

And that is the real world definition of Scientific Objective in the world of how products produced via the science Organic Chemistry get to market.

I know you're too stupid to accept why half of scientific theories are proven within a decade or 2 to be bullshit.