Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,250
- 99,375
- 3,645
Yes, that was half his point. It shows how the game is rigged in this made up fantasy of a creator.Poor little tailless and hairless monkey, no deist beliefs God is created.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, that was half his point. It shows how the game is rigged in this made up fantasy of a creator.Poor little tailless and hairless monkey, no deist beliefs God is created.
I've already explained natural selection as evidence for God. As for the rest, stop lying or stop BELIEVING in lies. You're ridiculous. We still have apes and none of them are bipedal.Sorry but there are literally mountains of evidence. Seriously, go climb a mountain and you might see for yourself.
Your copy and paste is a lie and ridiculous. We know you don't have a hard science degree.You're not the first to ask that question so you could do your own homework but, if you really wanted to know:
The religious extremists you call creationers know nothing of what you claim. As we know, religious extremists do no research and publish in no peer reviewed journals.Your copy and paste is a lie and ridiculous. We know you don't have a hard science degree.
The creationists know asexual reproduction provides up to twice as much reproductive success. This is fitness as in survival of the fittest compared to sexual reproduction. Based on natural selection, how could the latter ever gain enough advantage if evolution is true?
So... we are to accept that extinctions of entire populations is evidence for your gods?I've already explained natural selection as evidence for God. As for the rest, stop lying or stop BELIEVING in lies. You're ridiculous. We still have apes and none of them are bipedal.
"Spontaneous"? That is creationism not evolution. We see today that many bacteria exchange snippets of their DNA with each other. Is it such a stretch to envision this evolving into a more elaborate system?You can post any bullshit that pleases you but you didn't answer the question.
The spontaneous existence of at least one male and at least one female...
You're right about me not having a hard science degree, I actually have two.Your copy and paste is a lie and ridiculous. We know you don't have a hard science degree.
First off, I doubt creationists "know" asexual reproduction provides up to twice as much reproductive success, they just take it on faith. Sexual reproduction evolved to unleash a species' genetic diversity by mixing genes. The species that didn't are mostly now extinct.The creationists know asexual reproduction provides up to twice as much reproductive success. This is fitness as in survival of the fittest compared to sexual reproduction. Based on natural selection, how could the latter ever gain enough advantage if evolution is true?
Was being bipedal their goal? Most mammals are quadrupeds and can out run us with ease.I've already explained natural selection as evidence for God. As for the rest, stop lying or stop BELIEVING in lies. You're ridiculous. We still have apes and none of them are bipedal.
Yes."Spontaneous"? That is creationism not evolution. We see today that many bacteria exchange snippets of their DNA with each other. Is it such a stretch to envision this evolving into a more elaborate system?
You seem like a devout person but you refuse to accept how God does his job.Yes.
Then, why do you need to c&p from liberal wikipedia?You're right about me not having a hard science degree, I actually have two.
No. I learned that one find's God with faith just like you learned to take atheism and evolution upon "faith." With my faith, I find evidence for God from reading the Bible. It has the prophecy of evolution as exchanging a lie for the truth. Throughout history, creationists have always had the greatest scientists. From there, we find asexual reproduction is 2x better than sexual reproduction in terms of fitness. Or we know apes today are not bipedal. It means evolution's natural selection is a LIE. Even radiometric years do not have anything to do with calendar years.First off, I doubt creationists "know" asexual reproduction provides up to twice as much reproductive success, they just take it on faith. Sexual reproduction evolved to unleash a species' genetic diversity by mixing genes. The species that didn't are mostly now extinct.
We know how God does his job and it isn't through evolutionYou seem like a devout person but you refuse to accept how God does his job.
No religion respects science nearly as much as Judaism.You seem like a devout person but you refuse to accept how God does his job.
They did a good job summarizing the scienceThen, why do you need to c&p from liberal wikipedia?
I learned my evolution on evidence I can see with my own eyes. I don't consider a single source as convincing evidence, especially when it conflicts with my own eyes.No. I learned that one find's God with faith just like you learned to take atheism and evolution upon "faith."
I have no clue what that means.With my faith, I find evidence for God from reading the Bible. It has the prophecy of evolution as exchanging a lie for the truth.
Who said asexual reproduction is 2x better than sexual reproduction in terms of fitness?Throughout history, creationists have always had the greatest scientists. From there, we find asexual reproduction is 2x better than sexual reproduction in terms of fitness.
Are you saying chimps would be better able to climb trees if they were bipedal like we are? How good is your tree climbing?Or we know apes today are not bipedal. It means evolution's natural selection is a LIE.
Yet it has been confirmed many times.Even radiometric years do not have anything to do with calendar years.
So you're not a very good Jew then? All the Jews I know accept evolution.No religion respects science nearly as much as Judaism.
Why do you think so many Jews are MDs and scientists?
What evolution have you seen with your own eyes.They did a good job summarizing the science
I learned my evolution on evidence I can see with my own eyes. I don't consider a single source as convincing evidence, especially when it conflicts with my own eyes.
I have no clue what that means.
Who said asexual reproduction is 2x better than sexual reproduction in terms of fitness?
Are you saying chimps would be better able to climb trees if they were bipedal like we are? How good is your tree climbing?
Yet it has been confirmed many times.
It is quite a slow process but there are documented instances of speciation in both birds and plants that has happened in a relatively short time span.What evolution have you seen with your own eyes.
I hiked the Grand Canyon and the fossils in the older rock layers were very different from those of the younger layers. Species appeared and disappeared. Either God is continually creating new species or they evolved naturally.What evolution have you seen with your own eyes.
That issue was resolved in the 60s and you full well know that was caused by volcanic activity.I hiked the Grand Canyon and the fossils in the older rock layers were very different from those of the younger layers. Species appeared and disappeared. Either God is continually creating new species or they evolved naturally.