BreezeWood
VIP Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 17,650
- 1,429
- 85
.And you did nothing to clarify anything. So I am still at the exact same place in understanding as I was before you got that off your chest. Hope you feel better.ReinyDays something has been nagging at me. If you believe Jesus was a historical figure but don't believe that Moses was a historical figure, then what does that say about Jesus when he spoke of Moses? Why would Jesus speak of Moses if Moses wasn't a historical figure? Doesn't that make you question whether was Jesus was a historical figure too? Or at least call into question the text that tells us that Jesus talked about Moses?
It's good to be nagged about something ... glad to be of service ... you've taken my words out of context ... worse, you refuse to acknowledge the context I spoke in ... you understand, but it makes you far too uncomfortable to ponder, thus you're refusing to admit ...
I'm sorry your assumptions failed you ... I can't help you if you don't think you need help ...
Maybe the fault lies with you. But regardless you still have the same incongruity.
Why would Jesus speak of Moses if Moses wasn't a historical figure?
.And you did nothing to clarify anything. So I am still at the exact same place in understanding as I was before you got that off your chest. Hope you feel better.
were you referring to your question ....
maybe your entire world view became unraveled and like the orange jesus simply refuse to accept the outcome - -
always willing to help ... and remember the religious itinerant is a historical figure even if not what you thought he was and so as well the religion of antiquity remains most likely as the underlying goal being the subject of the events of the 1st century, perhaps unknowingly irregardless the forged messages of the christian bible.