Zone1 Evidence of Design

[onefour1]

I found this video to be interesting:

 

[toobfreak]

The matter of incredible organization has never been in question, where opinions differ is that one camp supports the idea that intelligent universal design springs from universal intelligence, whereas the other camp maintains that intelligent universal design sprang from accident, and that all we are is that one permutation which happened to bring forth intelligence otherwise no one would be here to be observing that there is intelligent design.

 

[Moonglow]

One of the ideas involved in the concept of entropy is that nature tends from order to disorder in isolated systems

Entropy

 

[Penelope]

I found this video to be interesting:

There is no evidence of design. From?

From Saints in The South Interview)​

 

[alang1216]

I found this video to be interesting

I'm perfectly content to say I don't know where we came from or why we're here. The fact we are here is only evidence that we are possible.

 

[Penelope]

I'm perfectly content to say I don't know where we came from or why we're here. The fact we are here is only evidence that we are possible.

Killing each other, we were fish, took a lot of years to make us. Druggies are the main things, alcoholics just as bad. Killing got to have their guns.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I found this video to be interesting:

Why did you find it "interesting"?

 

[alang1216]

Killing each other, we were fish, took a lot of years to make us. Druggies are the main things, alcoholics just as bad. Killing got to have their guns.

Thank you ChatBot.

 

[JoeMoma]

Organic life is coded by DNA which is composed of 4 proteins. I am astounded by the theory that biological life spontaneously sprang out of the randomness of the universe on our tiny little planet. And life is coded by DNA in base 4, much more complex than our base 2 computer code. And of course there is the question of how the existence of our massive universe came about, of which life came about.

On the other hand, how can the origin of existence ever be explained. Simply saying God, a greater being, created the universe doesn't answer how God came to be. Of course people say that God has no origin, that he has always existed, but that means that there was no ultimate origin for existence. If this is the case, then the "how" to existence will never be completely understood.

 

[alang1216]

Organic life is coded by DNA which is composed of 4 proteins. I am astounded by the theory that biological life spontaneously sprang out of the randomness of the universe on our tiny little planet. And life is coded by DNA in base 4, much more complex than our base 2 computer code. And of course there is the question of how the existence of our massive universe came about, of which life came about.

On the other hand, how can the origin of existence ever be explained. Simply saying God, a greater being, created the universe doesn't answer how God came to be. Of course people say that God has no origin, that he has always existed, but that means that there was no ultimate origin for existence. If this is the case, then the "how" to existence will never be completely understood.

So far, almost everyone who said "what we don't know today will never be known" has been proven wrong. Existence may be found to be an inevitable and fundamental result of natural forces.

 

[JoeMoma]

So far, almost everyone who said "what we don't know today will never be known" has been proven wrong. Existence may be found to be an inevitable and fundamental result of natural forces.

And how did those natural forces come to exist? And how did that happen, and so on, etc?

 

[alang1216]

And how did those natural forces come to exist? And how did that happen, and so on, etc?

Good questions but we know a lot about the structure of the universe so it seems reasonable to think we'll continue to learn more and eventually get answers to those questions.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Splendid, profound video. Kudos to onefour1.

Organic life is coded by DNA which is composed of 4 proteins. I am astounded by the theory that biological life spontaneously sprang out of the randomness of the universe on our tiny little planet. And life is coded by DNA in base 4, much more complex than our base 2 computer code. And of course there is the question of how the existence of our massive universe came about, of which life came about.

DNA is composed of the four bases, whose formulae are
C5H5N5
C5H5N5O
C4H5N3O
and C5H6N2O2

They are far simpler in structure than any protein. This does not make DNA any less complex or amazing.

On the other hand, how can the origin of existence ever be explained. Simply saying God, a greater being, created the universe doesn't answer how God came to be. Of course people say that God has no origin, that he has always existed, but that means that there was no ultimate origin for existence. If this is the case, then the "how" to existence will never be completely understood.

"If someone made God then He wouldn't be God, would He?" - Professor John Lennox, Cambridge University as stated in his wonderful YouTube video, "A Matter of Gravity"

I recommend it very highly, particularly for atheists and agnostics who need it desperately.
You had better get your acts straight. You will be very sorry if you do not.

 

[JoeMoma]

Good questions but we know a lot about the structure of the universe so it seems reasonable to think we'll continue to learn more and eventually get answers to those questions.

We don't even know what those questions are yet. Each question leads to more questions.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Atheists relentlessy pound the Bible when believers discuss science. Likewise they preach "science of the gaps" and pretend that even IF science doesn't have the answers to intractable questions now, it WILL HAVE, you betcha.

Laughably naive, dishonest, and inconsistent with the scientific record.
Example: Why do masses attract each other, and do so with perfect correspondance as to distance and relative masses? HOW can science possibly answer that question? It cannot and will not.

 

[alang1216]

Atheists relentlessy pound the Bible when believers discuss science. Likewise they preach "science of the gaps" and pretend that even IF science doesn't have the answers to intractable questions now, it WILL HAVE, you betcha.

Laughably naive, dishonest, and inconsistent with the scientific record.
Example: Why do masses attract each other, and do so with perfect correspondance as to distance and relative masses? HOW can science possibly answer that question? It cannot and will not.

I believe science has already answered that question. It is the exchange of the Higgs boson.

 

[Hollie]

Splendid, profound video. Kudos to onefour1.



DNA is composed of the four bases, whose formulae are
C5H5N5
C5H5N5O
C4H5N3O
and C5H6N2O2

They are far simpler in structure than any protein. This does not make DNA any less complex or amazing.



"If someone made God then He wouldn't be God, would He?" - Professor John Lennox, Cambridge University as stated in his wonderful YouTube video, "A Matter of Gravity"

I recommend it very highly, particularly for atheists and agnostics who need it desperately.
You had better get your acts straight. You will be very sorry if you do not.

Why do religious extremists insist on using their gods to threaten others?

 

[Hollie]

Atheists relentlessy pound the Bible when believers discuss science. Likewise they preach "science of the gaps" and pretend that even IF science doesn't have the answers to intractable questions now, it WILL HAVE, you betcha.

Laughably naive, dishonest, and inconsistent with the scientific record.
Example: Why do masses attract each other, and do so with perfect correspondance as to distance and relative masses? HOW can science possibly answer that question? It cannot and will not.

I find it most impressive that the Soothsayer / carnival side show barker knows with 100% certainty (while possessing 0% facts) that science cannot and will not answer questions about the physical universe.

 

[alang1216]

We don't even know what those questions are yet. Each question leads to more questions.

And more answers

 

[JoeMoma]

And more answers

Not necessarily.