Evidence of ancient cities beneath the Amazon rainforest...

[Cougarbear]

Ok then. This Christian disagrees.

Why does the atheist disagree with the scientific fact that carbon dating is inaccurate quite a bit?

 

[Failzero]

Says who?

Google is your redeemer

 

[Cougarbear]

Google is your redeemer

Not good enough. What is your proof?

 

[Failzero]

Not good enough. What is your proof?

Archeologists and University Labs

 

[Failzero]

Not good enough. What is your proof?

Turkish Government

 

[bodecea]

Karahan Tepi
And Gobekli Tepi region is a Mega Community / City from 14 +
Thousand years ago and May predate last Ice Age by thousands of years

The amazing about that it was built by hunter gatherers.. not farmers.

 

[Failzero]

The amazing about that it was built by hunter gatherers.. not farmers.

Pre Diluvial Civilization that existed prior to what was thought of as Hunter gatherer timeframes

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Modern archeologists "believe" in old earth. Sounds like a religion of the atheists. Actually, again, there has been no evidence that any of the uncovered ruins are more than 3, 000 or 4,000 years old.

Gobekli Tepe

 

[Cougarbear]

Archeologists and University Labs

I can say the same thing. Archeologists and University Labs have concluded that Carbon Dating can be very inaccurate.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The amazing about that it was built by hunter gatherers.. not farmers.

LOL!

The used deer antlers quarry, cut and place the 20 ton stones, right?

 

[watchingfromafar]

fact that carbon dating is inaccurate quite a bit?

I have read some of your posts and based on that I question your claims. It is for this reason I ask you for some proof about carbon dating inaccuracies.
I have read some of your posts and based on that I question your claims. It is from this reason I ask you for some proof about carbon dating inaccuracies.

Radiocarbon dating (also referred to as carbon dating or carbon-14 dating) is a method for determining the age of an object containing organic material by using the properties of radiocarbon, a radioactive isotope of carbon.

The method was developed in the late 1940s at the University of Chicago by Willard Libby. It is based on the fact that radiocarbon is constantly being created in the Earth's atmosphere by the interaction of cosmic rays with atmospheric nitrogen. The resulting combines with atmospheric oxygen to form radioactive carbon dioxide, which is incorporated into plants by photosynthesis; animals then acquire by eating the plants. When the animal or plant dies, it stops exchanging carbon with its environment, and thereafter the amount of it contains begins to decrease as the undergoes radioactive decay. Measuring the amount of in a sample from a dead plant or animal, such as a piece of wood or a fragment of bone, provides information that can be used to calculate when the animal or plant died. The older a sample is, the less there is to be detected, and because the half-life of (the period of time after which half of a given sample will have decayed) is about 5,730 years, the oldest dates that can be reliably measured by this process date to approximately 50,000 years ago, although special preparation methods occasionally make an accurate analysis of older samples possible. Libby received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his work in 1960.
Radiocarbon dating - Wikipedia

-

 

[Mushroom]

North America's Oldest Human Artifacts Found In Idaho

History books say humans arrived in North America via the Bering Land Bridge. North America's oldest human artifacts indicate that may not be the case.

www.opb.org

This is no secret.

Yet you claim this find around 16 kya who used the Clovis Point proves there was a civilization in South America making monolithic stone structures at around the same time?

You just can not stop posting junk science, can you?

 

[Mushroom]

how old do you think the Earth is ?

That is actually a trick question.

Earth Mark I, or Earth Mark II?

"Earth" itself is approximately 4.6 billion years old.

We actually live on "Earth Mark II", which is around 4.5 billion years old.

 

[the other mike]

This is no secret.

Yet you claim this find around 16 kya who used the Clovis Point proves there was a civilization in South America making monolithic stone structures at around the same time?

You just can not stop posting junk science, can you?

I made no association of one with the other.
Apparently you still have it in for me because I always end up calling you out on your lies....Iraq, depleted uranium, 9/11 , JFK , vax mandates.......
Now this.

 

[Cougarbear]

I have read some of your posts and based on that I question your claims. It is for this reason I ask you for some proof about carbon dating inaccuracies.
I have read some of your posts and based on that I question your claims. It is from this reason I ask you for some proof about carbon dating inaccuracies.

Radiocarbon dating (also referred to as carbon dating or carbon-14 dating) is a method for determining the age of an object containing organic material by using the properties of radiocarbon, a radioactive isotope of carbon.

The method was developed in the late 1940s at the University of Chicago by Willard Libby. It is based on the fact that radiocarbon is constantly being created in the Earth's atmosphere by the interaction of cosmic rays with atmospheric nitrogen. The resulting combines with atmospheric oxygen to form radioactive carbon dioxide, which is incorporated into plants by photosynthesis; animals then acquire by eating the plants. When the animal or plant dies, it stops exchanging carbon with its environment, and thereafter the amount of it contains begins to decrease as the undergoes radioactive decay. Measuring the amount of in a sample from a dead plant or animal, such as a piece of wood or a fragment of bone, provides information that can be used to calculate when the animal or plant died. The older a sample is, the less there is to be detected, and because the half-life of (the period of time after which half of a given sample will have decayed) is about 5,730 years, the oldest dates that can be reliably measured by this process date to approximately 50,000 years ago, although special preparation methods occasionally make an accurate analysis of older samples possible. Libby received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his work in 1960.
Radiocarbon dating - Wikipedia

-

Radiocarbon dating only works half the time. We may have found the solution

Dating is everything in archaeology. Exciting discoveries of ancient burial sites or jewelry might make headlines, but for scientists, this kind of discovery is only meaningful if we can tell how old the artifacts are.

phys.org

I like the title part where it says, "We MAY have found the solution." Old earth/universe scientists can't help themselves using fuzzy words. They know that science is never settled. So, they protect themselves with fuzzy words.

Radiocarbon in 'Ancient' Fossil Wood

The presence of measurable radiocarbon in fossil wood supposedly tens and hundreds of millions of years old has been well-documented.1-5 Baumgardner6 has similarly reported measurable radiocarbon in ancient organic materials, well above the threshold of the accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS)...

www.icr.org

 

[the other mike]

Any history between the last 12 to 15 thousand years and 200,000 years is being purposefully suppressed . The Smithsonian Museum has an enormous basement full of secrets dating back to the earliest Lewis and Clark expeditions findings.

Why are there caves in the Grand Canyon closed off from the public ? And we know it's not for safety.

 

[the other mike]

This starts off pretty good but I haven't watched all of it

 

[the other mike]

THE ANCIENT GIANTS WHO RULED AMERICA, MISSING SKELETONS AND THE SMITHSONIAN COVER UP

Read THE ANCIENT GIANTS WHO RULED AMERICA, MISSING SKELETONS AND THE SMITHSONIAN COVER UP by Harold Arroyo, Jr. on Issuu and browse thousands of ot...

issuu.com

 

[Mushroom]

I made no association of one with the other.
Apparently you still have it in for me because I always end up calling you out on your lies....Iraq, depleted uranium, 9/11 , JFK , vax mandates

We are talking about roughly the same time period. Yet, no association?

And no, it is not calling me out on "lies", it is my calling you out on your nonsensical and illogical posts that are more conspiracy theory than anything else.

 

[the other mike]

We are talking about roughly the same time period. Yet, no association?

And no, it is not calling me out on "lies", it is my calling you out on your nonsensical and illogical posts that are more conspiracy theory than anything else.

So how's that whole 'labeling everything which doesn't fit your narrative a conspiracy theory' working out for you guys ? It's not much of a leap to assume you're part of the established school of thought. Not much gray area to work with.