Zone1 Everybody Worships....The Choice is....

Maybe you could provide real quotes as opposed to misquotes?
  • Actual quote: "If role reform sounds sexually unsettling, think how it will change the sexual hypocrisy we have now. [...] No more men who are encouraged to spend a lifetime living with inferiors; with housekeepers, or dependent creatures who are still children."


You more than anyone, needs a fact-checker.
Housewives are dependent creatures who are still children…parasites.

Gloria Steinem
 
Maybe you could provide real quotes as opposed to misquotes?
  • Actual quote: "If role reform sounds sexually unsettling, think how it will change the sexual hypocrisy we have now. [...] No more men who are encouraged to spend a lifetime living with inferiors; with housekeepers, or dependent creatures who are still children."


You more than anyone, needs a fact-checker.
Steinem had this to say about me and the millions of other women like me: "[Housewives] are dependent creatures who are still children ... parasites."
 
Which ever way it is phrased is equally clueless. How many women today plant their own vegetable gardens to the extent they are canning fruits and vegetables to last through the winter. How many make their own soap and candles, sew clothes for the entire family, bake bread, cook daily meals for their families. How many are braiding rugs, crocheting or quilting blankets for bedding? Before vacuum cleaners, rugs were taken up, and dust beaten out of them. Sweeping, washing dishes were a part of daily chores, not to mention all the ironing. And, of course, tending and teaching children. Women were also tending chickens, milking cows, selling milk for "egg money". One my female ancestors made her egg money by making and selling brooms in her spare time. Others did fine embroidery that were for sale.

It wasn't until after the second world war and the inventions of vacuums, dishwashers, washers, dryers, refrigerators, freezers, microwaves, canned goods, frozen foods that women--housewives--began to find themselves with time on their hands. It wasn't the government or "feminists" that ushered housewives into the workplace because they were dependents. Housewives--especially as children were of school age--looked around for what else the could do, what else needed to be done because they had time on their hands. Women, by nature are workers, and we are good workers at that.

This generation needs to be deeply ashamed of how they speak and see women of previous generations--and how they perceive men treating these wonderful partners in living the lives that were theirs. Those "Feminists" whining about women being mistreated--thinking that (most) women would even allow themselves to be mistreated--were imbeciles.
She said it, but on "second thought," the Left/Democrats/Feminists decided to hide it.


The do what Winston Smith did for Big Brother in 1984, 'alter' what had been written.
 
Maybe you could provide real quotes as opposed to misquotes?
  • Actual quote: "If role reform sounds sexually unsettling, think how it will change the sexual hypocrisy we have now. [...] No more men who are encouraged to spend a lifetime living with inferiors; with housekeepers, or dependent creatures who are still children."


You more than anyone, needs a fact-checker.
Once again we find, you and I, to be two sides of the coin: Moi, never wrong, Toi, never correct.
Who'd you vote for?
 
What is the meaning of "christian nation debate"?
From google>>>

A Christian nation is a country that either officially recognizes Christianity as its state religion or where Christianity heavily influences its laws, culture, and values.


~S~
 
From google>>>

A Christian nation is a country that either officially recognizes Christianity as its state religion or where Christianity heavily influences its laws, culture, and values.


~S~
What does that have to do with me.....?

I have never said that anyone has to be Christian....and the Constitution is pretty clear on that issue.


But I have provided the historicity of America's founding, which is not a "debate."


You can check.

1. 9 of the original 13 states required one to be a Bible-believing Christian to hold office

2.All 13 required a declaration of faith

3.9 of 13 required you to be a Protestand, Maryland a Catholic

4. All the state constitutions required "I profess Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior"

5. 55 of 56 signers of the Declaration were Bible-believing church attending Christians

6. Common law itself comes from Blackstone, who was Christian, and common law comes from the Scriptures

7. God is mentioned four times in the Declaratioin

8. "We appeal to the Supreme Judge of the Universe" is a phrase most commonly found in the Declaration of Independence, signifying that the authors are invoking God as the ultimate authority to validate their actions and intentions in declaring independence from Great Britain; essentially, asking God to judge the righteousness of their cause.

9.There is a specific reference to Christ in the Constitution, after article 7.

10.The book most quoted anywhere at the time of our founding was Deuteronomy, with Moses talking about how government should be set up.

11. John Adams said, “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
From Charlie Kirk
 
Last edited:
Interesting thread here, so at the risk of (yet another) christian nation debate (done to death) , i have to wonder if we as a people, as a race for that matter, are incapable of achieving a moral civilization ?

unfuzz me plz.....

~S~
Let me comment on the other thing you wrote, which is definitely a question an educated person would ask.....judging by the gains that cultural Marxism has made here.

I also have my doubts about our future......unless we take back the schools and the media becomes more even handed.


Have to agree with your suggestion in that question.
 
Have to agree with your suggestion in that question.
well PC , the question posed is one commonly asked via these never ending debates, often the FF's are mentioned, mainly deists who escaped a theocracy who carefully crafted a constitution with separation of church and state

yet we subscribe to having our moral standards dictated via the church, ergo the conundrum.

i would suggest one take a serious look at theocratic nations , and just how their contingent fares, for starters (addressing your OP) most are woefully misogynist

~S~
 
yet we subscribe to having our moral standards dictated via the church, ergo the conundrum.
False narrative. We subscribe to having moral standards period.
 
Housewives are dependent creatures who are still children…parasites.

Gloria Steinem
Steinem had this to say about me and the millions of other women like me: "[Housewives] are dependent creatures who are still children ... parasites."
Citing websites that echo the misquote of Steinem does not change the fact they are still misquotes. I linked to the actual interview where the misquotes are taken from but you still maintain the disinformation. I don't believe you are stupid so that only leaves dishonest.
 
Once again we find, you and I, to be two sides of the coin: Moi, never wrong, Toi, never correct.
Who'd you vote for?
Never admitting you are wrong is not the same as being right. That is why I voted for the more honest of the two.
 
It never ceases to amaze that both sides have intertwined religion with politics. With politics being the stronger pull between the two.
 
It never ceases to amaze that both sides have intertwined religion with politics. With politics being the stronger pull between the two.
It may be my bias speaking but I think the Right has been the more vocal about bringing religion into politics, going back to the Moral Majority. Abortion and gay marriage/rights being the biggest issues.
 
It may be my bias speaking but I think the Right has been the more vocal about bringing religion into politics, going back to the Moral Majority. Abortion and gay marriage/rights being the biggest issues.
I see no difference between the two.
 
well PC , the question posed is one commonly asked via these never ending debates, often the FF's are mentioned, mainly deists who escaped a theocracy who carefully crafted a constitution with separation of church and state

yet we subscribe to having our moral standards dictated via the church, ergo the conundrum.

i would suggest one take a serious look at theocratic nations , and just how their contingent fares, for starters (addressing your OP) most are woefully misogynist

~S~
“The Founders of this country had a reason for favoring the Jewish people, due to their attachment to the Bible, and because the Founders saw themselves as descendants of the People of the Book.

“Rather than just tolerate the Jews as another religious minority, America’s Founding Fathers were profoundly inspired by Jewish ideas, …. understanding liberty not as an individual license for each of us to pursue his or her bliss but as a collective commitment to a greater good under the watchful eyes of God.” In American Jewish History, a Key to Future Greatness


None of the Founders was a deist. All believed in a God who took an interest in us, and our country.

“Benjamin Franklin’s proposals for a Great Seal featuring not an eagle but Moses and the Israelites crossing the Red Sea.”
1637870738043.png








First Committee's Design for America's Great Seal - 1776
 
Citing websites that echo the misquote of Steinem does not change the fact they are still misquotes. I linked to the actual interview where the misquotes are taken from but you still maintain the disinformation. I don't believe you are stupid so that only leaves dishonest.
No, you dunce, the point is that after I have listed over 50 lies and hoaxes produced by the Democrats, you still fail to ascertain how they operate.

Every totalitarian regime controls the dissemination of information, knowing that fools like you will not question, no matter how many earlier lies have been exposed.


Let me provide one simple bromide for you to memorize that will aid to your understanding:

.....a simple rule that will clarify the current milieu:

Any article, event, opinion, data or study that redounds in favor of the Left/Demorat Party, is to be considered a lie or hoax.

Begin with that rule and you will never go wrong.
 
It never ceases to amaze that both sides have intertwined religion with politics. With politics being the stronger pull between the two.
The two are inseparable.


AI Overview
Learn more

The Pope acquired sovereignty over Vatican City through the Lateran Treaty, a pact signed in 1929 between the Holy See (the Pope) and the Kingdom of Italy, represented by Benito Mussolini. This treaty recognized Vatican City as an independent state and granted the church financial compensation for the loss of the Papal States. Prior to this, the Pope had ruled over the Papal States for centuries.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom