Even the government itself admitted in the 70's there was a conspiracy to kill JFK.

[7forever]

I'm only here because it's snowing out, I can't go fishing, and I'm bored.

What else is there to do on a boring Sunday afternoon, but poking sticks at a lunatic like you??

Okay. Whatever, but the driver still did it and no proof has been offered to the contrary, you little twit. You can't articulate anything about this case because you know the simple truth has been reached.

Yes, I do know the truth has been reached.

50 years ago, when Oswald got busted for shooting JFK.

With JFK's help from behind the grassy knoll fence.

You have zero proof. You have nothing but your inability to prove a negative and to refute a fact. That's why your silent, because you've lost.

 

[7forever]

If the videos are mine, why did you admit to over-compressing them with a VCR and analog TV?

Have you dropped so far down the rabbit hole that you don't remember what you admitted to??

Can you show a person shot from the rear whose slammed backward besides jfk? Get to work you mental midget.

Can you name anyone else who was shot from behind while seated in an open convertible whose driver was accelerating away from the gunman after hearing shots??

I'll wait.

Your writing makes no sense, you retard. No surprise there, since you rarely post anything but stupidity.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Okay. Whatever, but the driver still did it and no proof has been offered to the contrary, you little twit. You can't articulate anything about this case because you know the simple truth has been reached.

Yes, I do know the truth has been reached.

50 years ago, when Oswald got busted for shooting JFK.

With JFK's help from behind the grassy knoll fence.

You have zero proof. You have nothing but your inability to prove a negative and to refute a fact. That's why your silent, because you've lost.

Exactly how does someone "prove a negative"??

Be specific.


This ought to be good.

 

[7forever]

If the videos are mine, why did you admit to over-compressing them with a VCR and analog TV?

Have you dropped so far down the rabbit hole that you don't remember what you admitted to??

Can you show a person shot from the rear whose slammed backward besides jfk? Get to work you mental midget.

Can you name anyone else who was shot from behind while seated in an open convertible whose driver was accelerating away from the gunman after hearing shots??

I'll wait.

Can you name another case besides jfk where a President was shot by their driver while sitting in an open convertible while the Patsy was in the lunchroom drinking a coke??

I'll wait.

 

[7forever]

Yes, I do know the truth has been reached.

50 years ago, when Oswald got busted for shooting JFK.

With JFK's help from behind the grassy knoll fence.

You have zero proof. You have nothing but your inability to prove a negative and to refute a fact. That's why your silent, because you've lost.

Exactly how does someone "prove a negative"??

Be specific.


This ought to be good.

You would pretend that the negative is true, therefore you couldn't prove it. You believe in a myth, I guess. How exactly do you prove Greer was innocent? That's what you'd have to do. Nobody can do it or will ever try.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

You have zero proof. You have nothing but your inability to prove a negative and to refute a fact. That's why your silent, because you've lost.

Exactly how does someone "prove a negative"??

Be specific.


This ought to be good.

You would pretend that the negative is true, therefore you couldn't prove it. You believe in a myth, I guess. How exactly do you prove Greer was innocent? That's what you'd have to do. Nobody can do it or will ever try.

You would pretend that the negative is true

That is the single funniest thing I have ever read on this message board.

And I've read posts from Truthmatters, Rimjob, and Christophera.

 

[7forever]

c'mon Seven, you whiny prat Show me something that you didn't doctor by multiple filmings from VCR tape to analog TV.

If I doctored anything, then the witnesses wouldn't be available. They saw the shot.

Of course there are no witnesses to you doctoring the tapes, .

I'm glad you understand that the films do prove Greer's shot, you loser of epic proportions. That's your admission of Greer's guilt, accusing me of making it look like he fired.

 

[7forever]

Exactly how does someone "prove a negative"??

Be specific.


This ought to be good.

You would pretend that the negative is true, therefore you couldn't prove it. You believe in a myth, I guess. How exactly do you prove Greer was innocent? That's what you'd have to do. Nobody can do it or will ever try.

You would pretend that the negative is true

That is the single funniest thing I have ever read on this message board.

And I've read posts from Truthmatters, Rimjob, and Christophera.

Okay, you wouldn't even pretend it was true.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

You would pretend that the negative is true, therefore you couldn't prove it. You believe in a myth, I guess. How exactly do you prove Greer was innocent? That's what you'd have to do. Nobody can do it or will ever try.

You would pretend that the negative is true

That is the single funniest thing I have ever read on this message board.

And I've read posts from Truthmatters, Rimjob, and Christophera.

Okay, you wouldn't even pretend it was true.

OK then, I will pretend that you are a shape shifting reptilian invader from Ceti Alpha 5.

Prove you're not.

 

[7forever]

Exactly how does someone "prove a negative"??

Be specific.


This ought to be good.

You would pretend that the negative is true, therefore you couldn't prove it. You believe in a myth, I guess. How exactly do you prove Greer was innocent? That's what you'd have to do. Nobody can do it or will ever try.

You would pretend that the negative is true

That is the single funniest thing I have ever read on this message board.

And I've read posts from Truthmatters, Rimjob, and Christophera.

It doesn't matter what you believe or want to be true, only that you cannot challenge the visual facts that prove Greer was the real assassin. This board or any other never challenged the evidence even remotely. The truth is stapled all over google and nothing can change that.

 

[7forever]

That is the single funniest thing I have ever read on this message board.

And I've read posts from Truthmatters, Rimjob, and Christophera.

Okay, you wouldn't even pretend it was true.

OK then, I will pretend that you are a shape shifting reptilian invader from Ceti Alpha 5.

Prove you're not.

You can pretend that I altered the films to look like he fired and that he didn't.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

You would pretend that the negative is true, therefore you couldn't prove it. You believe in a myth, I guess. How exactly do you prove Greer was innocent? That's what you'd have to do. Nobody can do it or will ever try.

You would pretend that the negative is true

That is the single funniest thing I have ever read on this message board.

And I've read posts from Truthmatters, Rimjob, and Christophera.

It doesn't matter what you believe or want to be true, only that you cannot challenge the visual facts that prove Greer was the real assassin. This board or any other never challenged the evidence even remotely. The truth is stapled all over google and nothing can change that.

This board, and all the others you post on (even the ones that had the sense to ban your idiocy) laugh at your feeble attempts to peddle your "theory".

Nothing will ever change that.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Okay, you wouldn't even pretend it was true.

OK then, I will pretend that you are a shape shifting reptilian invader from Ceti Alpha 5.

Prove you're not.

You can pretend that I altered the films to look like he fired and that he didn't.

c'mon, you lumpy uneven pile of Bantha poo-doo, prove you're not an alien from Ceti Alpha 5. If you can.

 

[7forever]

That is the single funniest thing I have ever read on this message board.

And I've read posts from Truthmatters, Rimjob, and Christophera.

It doesn't matter what you believe or want to be true, only that you cannot challenge the visual facts that prove Greer was the real assassin. This board or any other never challenged the evidence even remotely. The truth is stapled all over google and nothing can change that.

This board, and all the others you post on (even the ones that had the sense to ban your idiocy) laugh at your feeble attempts to peddle your "theory".

Nothing will ever change that.

They try to ridicule me but are simply making fun of this fact. Nothing will ever change that.

 

[7forever]

OK then, I will pretend that you are a shape shifting reptilian invader from Ceti Alpha 5.

Prove you're not.

You can pretend that I altered the films to look like he fired and that he didn't.

c'mon, you lumpy uneven pile of Bantha poo-doo, prove you're not an alien from Ceti Alpha 5. If you can.

c'mon, you lumpy uneven pile of Bantha poo-doo, prove Greer isn't the assassin.

 

[7forever]

That is the single funniest thing I have ever read on this message board.

And I've read posts from Truthmatters, Rimjob, and Christophera.

It doesn't matter what you believe or want to be true, only that you cannot challenge the visual facts that prove Greer was the real assassin. This board or any other never challenged the evidence even remotely. The truth is stapled all over google and nothing can change that.

This board, and all the others you post on (even the ones that had the sense to ban your idiocy) laugh at your feeble attempts to peddle your "theory".

Nothing will ever change that.

The devil's in the details. That's where I went all the way and then some. No one barely flicked their feet in the water because it's easily proven. I told the truth and making fun of it is a way to deal with it.

 

[7forever]

That is the single funniest thing I have ever read on this message board.

And I've read posts from Truthmatters, Rimjob, and Christophera.

It doesn't matter what you believe or want to be true, only that you cannot challenge the visual facts that prove Greer was the real assassin. This board or any other never challenged the evidence even remotely. The truth is stapled all over google and nothing can change that.

This board, and all the others you post on (even the ones that had the sense to ban your idiocy) laugh at your feeble attempts to peddle your "theory".

Nothing will ever change that.

This board, and all the others I posted it on (even the ones that banned the truth) know Greer was the shooter after seeing the videos. You're an easy mock.

Nothing will ever change that.

 

[7forever]

You can pretend that I altered the films to look like he fired and that he didn't.

c'mon, you lumpy uneven pile of Bantha poo-doo, prove you're not an alien from Ceti Alpha 5. If you can.

c'mon, you lumpy uneven pile of Bantha poo-doo, prove Greer isn't the assassin.

Since the government alterations are obvious, what is your defense against Greer's guilt, besides laughing at, because I'm right there with you, my little bitch?

 

[Bfgrn]

This thread has been hijacked by the retards AGAIN.

Hey 7, go somewhere to see a clear version of the Zapruder film. You have been basing your idiotic claim on poor quality You tube garbage. The driver did not shoot the President.

 

[7forever]

This thread has been hijacked by the retards AGAIN.

Hey 7, go somewhere to see a clear version of the Zapruder film. You have been basing your idiotic claim on poor quality You tube garbage. The driver did not shoot the President.

Where are Greer's hands before the shot? You'd have to acknowledge that they are off the wheel.