YOu are saying a lot here, so I want to address each point.
I have a fundamental difference of opinion with Obama, I don't care whether Obama is a Catholic, a Muslim, a Christian, white, black, purple. None of it matters. I dislike the way he is running and I believe is ruining the country.
You guys say that all day, but at the end of the day, Obama kept most of Bush's policies and adopted a lot of things Republicans used to say they were for. At least before the party was hijacked by crazy people.
I think that Obama has weaknesses, and the country would have been better served had HIllary won in 2008. Or John McCain, for that matter. Either one of them would have been a stronger leader.
But at the end of the day, an election is a choice, not a referendum. And Romney would be a bad choice.
A lot of your fears and ignorance about Mormons is pretty much the same prejudice that many had about JFK being a Catholic.
No, it's not nearly the same thing. My disdain of Mormonism is based on the fact I've educated myself on their history and beliefs, and they are damned ******* scary. Which is why Romney doesn't talk about his beliefs in anything but the most abstract way. There is simply such a level of crazy atached to it that it gives me a lot of pause.
I am against the new health care policy and it should be struck down by the Supreme Court..
Is the supreme court going to come up with an alternative plan for our broke-dick system? Or are they just going to play partisans. What I find amusing is that "conservatives" had no problem with ObamaCare under it's original title, "RomneyCare". (And Romney is running away from Romneycare faster than he's running away from the Mormon Crazy.) They had no problem with proposing it when it was an alternative to what Hillary proposed in the 1990's.
Now they have a problem with it because the Black Guy Did It.
I dislike the way he uses race, gender and social status to divide America, I dislike his vision of government and all that is required to be an acceptable American.
Okay, let's look at that.
On race, he said that a black professor shouldn't be treated like a criminal in his own home, or that a black kid being shot in the middle of the street by a thug was a serious matter. I'm not sure how he is "dividing us". The only division I would see is if that professor or that kid were white, it wouldn't be treated the same way.
Gender. Gee, was he the one having men testify whether women should have birth control or calling a woman who protested a "slut" to 20 million listeners?
Romney is less divisive, I think he has a better vision, Obama is not working for me, he is working against me.
Just my opinion.[/QUOTE]
I don't see Romney as being less divisive. His entire campaign is based on riling up the people who hate Obama and getting them to ignore his own record.