Could the costs possibly be due to inflation, not lack of governmental controls?
Um... no. Actually, the lack of insurance is part of the problem. When you require that emergency rooms have to treat poor people, those hospitals have to make it up somewhere else. Of course, we aren't going to let people die in the street, so we end up with emergency rooms treating something for ten times what a family practitioner would have, and passing it along.
The higher rates of bankruptcy you're talking about, could that be insurers? WTF are you talking about?
I'm talking about the fact that 63% of bankruptcies are linked to medical crisis, and of those, 75% of them had insurance when the crisis started.
Medical bills prompt more than 60 percent of U.S. bankruptcies - CNN
And infant mortality rates aren't higher here than 90% of the world unless you include abortions.
They are the highest in the industrialized world, that's the point. In fact, even Cuba has a lower infant mortality rate than we do.
Infant mortality rate statistics - countries compared - Nationmaster
China is at 114 while we're at 49. Canada is at 41 with 4.85 compared to 5.98. So they're just 1.13 persons per 1000 better than the United States....so that's nothing to brag about, and I seriously doubt that millions of illegals are flooding into their country looking for free health care.
Actually, China is at 25.28. But I was talking about industrialized countries. Looking at the other G-7 countries.
Germany- 4.2 despite still trying to assililate East Germany's battered infrastructure.
France - 4.31
Japan - 3.28
All of which spend a lot less per capita than we do and cover everyone. Oh, no doubt, we'll get the tired apologetics about counting premature births and all that nonsense...