Hillary is irrelevant. She is not on the ballot in 2014.
GOP number 1 goal - win back the Senate. Period. Focus on Obama's "post congressional" presidency. He believes he is a King. We need to remind him his is not.
As for 2016 ....Hillary will be destroyed by the first far left wingnut that promises more "redistribution" and "retribution" against the evil 1% and corporations. Just like 2008, her own party will defeat her. Leftists don't like Hillary- they want a a far left fringe wingnut. a true believer like Liz Warren. Hillary is too moderate for the "base".......she's a longshot.
1. We will take back the Senate and House in 2016 and the White House. And that is if your predictions of a take over this midterm come true. You are depending on people not showing up and that people will be voting for republicans. We'll see.
2. Why not promise to redistribute the wealth? The rich waged class warfare on the middle class and poor and you don't think we should fight back? Right now Walmart and Fast Food employees are unionizing. We need more unions not less. When people realize they aren't really rich enough to be republicans, they'll come back to voting for the party of the people. You can call it socialism but of course that is what a rich libertarian would tell you it is. They want every man for himself survival of the fittest no regulations. We see where that got us. But they say we didn't go far enough. Willing to believe them? Either you are rich or stupid.
Unions kick-back to Democrats.
Without unions their funds dry up.
Unions forced companies to outsource.
Do you support outsourcing?
Unions are the only voice labor has? Pretty pathetic, huh? Maybe collectively instead of forming a union workers should form a lobby.
That's exactly why the GOP is killing unions. Without them the Democrats are done especially in states like Michigan.
No, cheap china and india labor forced companies to outsource. It didn't FORCE them to do anything. Like all business' they only care about maximizing profits. So if American workers cost more than Indian or mexican workers, of course they want to may less not more. That's why NAFTA was a bad idea, but Bush made it even worse. Clinton might have signed NAFTA but you should see all the changes the GOP made from 2000-2006 when they had full control. LITERALLY passed a law giving corporations that were shipping jobs overseas a tax break. If that's not obvious to you nothing will be.