BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 44,062
- 27,188
- 2,615
Tombstone was a small town and easily controlled. Not quite the same as Chicago.seems he was violating the constitution and proving cops are just as corrupt as the criminals,,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tombstone was a small town and easily controlled. Not quite the same as Chicago.seems he was violating the constitution and proving cops are just as corrupt as the criminals,,
Why it's the truth.Mods need to rein-in the OP ASAP.
You're an Out Of Control Troll...Why it's the truth.
That's not true. Wyatt didn't have the force to patrol the perimeter. That's a lie.
How many times are you going to post it?Why it's the truth.
Gun control in the Old West
www.ndsu.edu
Oh yeah even Wyatt Earp only wanted to have himself and his deputies armed in town.
The shoot out in the ok corral was him trying to disarm the cowboys that won't follow his gun control laws.
Gun control in the Old West
www.ndsu.edu
Oh yeah even Wyatt Earp only wanted to have himself and his deputies armed in town.
The shoot out in the ok corral was him trying to disarm the cowboys that won't follow his gun control laws.
Gun control in the Old West
www.ndsu.edu
Oh yeah even Wyatt Earp only wanted to have himself and his deputies armed in town.
The shoot out in the ok corral was him trying to disarm the cowboys that won't follow his gun control laws.
I really only disagree with posters who choose to ignore, or remain ignorant, of firearm restrictions both in the 19th century but also in the 19th century.The law enforcement challenges and activities in U.S. Territories (not States) during the pioneer era are quite different than present day developed states.
Gun control in the Old West
www.ndsu.edu
Oh yeah even Wyatt Earp only wanted to have himself and his deputies armed in town.
The shoot out in the ok corral was him trying to disarm the cowboys that won't follow his gun control laws.
I really only disagree with posters who choose to ignore, or remain ignorant, of firearm restrictions both in the 19th century but also in the 19th century.
But the actual holding in the case just requires states to issue concealed carry permits to people who meet objective criteria without having to show some special need. That's the law in most states already. That's in Kavenaugh's concurrence and also in Alito's rather unpleasant cocurrence.
Well I disagree with those who say the Second Amend can't be regulated. It's ALWAYS been regulated. LOLI disagree with people who make false comparisons.
no it hasnt,, until 1934 there were no restrictions,,Well I disagree with those who say the Second Amend can't be regulated. It's ALWAYS been regulated. LOL
bs. I posted the link on the thread.no it hasnt,, until 1934 there were no restrictions,,
He's trying to set a USMB 1-Day record for the number of threads on the sane subject shut down for various reasons....How many times are you going to post it?