Irrelevant.
Lithium batteries do not replace gasoline. They are a storage medium, and not the energy itself.
The manner in which you are trying to compare lithium to oil is completely irrational and invalid.
A rational, valid comparison would be of the amount of oil to be burned to generate the electricity to charge those batteries, compared to the amount of oil to be burned more directly in an internal combustion engine to power a car directly.
For every galloon of oil refined and consumed in each of those manners, which one do you think will send a car further and faster? And if we're competing for any distance, beyond the basic range of each vehicle, then you need to take into account, also, the time to refuel a real car compared to the time to recharge an electric car.
———
If you want to compare lithium to anything, the valid comparison would be to the fuel tank in a real car.
You've been harping on the point that an electric car does not consume lithium as it runs. When it runs out of juice, the lithium is still there, and can be recharged.
Likewise, a real car does not consume its fuel tank. When the tank runs empty, it is still there, ready to be filled up with more gasoline.
Now, for any way in which we can compare a lithium battery to a gasoline tank, in terms of size, mass, cost, whatever; which one will give you more distance relative to whatever criterion you use for that comparison?