Europe on the brink of sucking America into another world war WW1 WW2 now WW3?!

China wants war with America

Or peace on china’s terms

If biden is lucid enough to resist he has my support
Can't agree: I think the Biden government is in so much trouble that they are willing to burn the country down with a huge war rather than continue on this course where their power will be transferred to the GOP. I don't think that applies to the Russia war, that is on Putin, but that the Dems are provoking China is hardly a secret, another band of leftwing congressmen go to Taiwan weekly now!

Like how handy WWII was to stop the Depression and distract the very upset country then. I never used to believe FDR allowed that war to start on purpose, but now I sort of wonder. He needed a war; and Biden needs one much, much worse.

So I think the Dems will start a war, and we'll lose a lot. There is no way this terminally divided country can fight any war, much less win. Which is probably the point: if the Dems can't keep the country, they'll let China and Russia destroy it.
 
China wants war with America

Or with other words: In a very stupid way Donald Trump started an economic war with China and China started to react. How many centuries in which way and what will be their final plans we will see ... or better to say we will not see. Our grand- or grandgrand-children will see.

Or peace on china’s terms

If biden is lucid enough to resist he has my support
 
Last edited:
Can't agree: I think the Biden government is in so much trouble that they are willing to burn the country down with a huge war rather than continue on this course where their power will be transferred to the GOP. I don't think that applies to the Russia war, that is on Putin, but that the Dems are provoking China is hardly a secret, another band of leftwing congressmen go to Taiwan weekly now!

Like how handy WWII was to stop the Depression and distract the very upset country then. I never used to believe FDR allowed that war to start on purpose, but now I sort of wonder. He needed a war; and Biden needs one much, much worse.

So I think the Dems will start a war, and we'll lose a lot. There is no way this terminally divided country can fight any war, much less win. Which is probably the point: if the Dems can't keep the country, they'll let China and Russia destroy it.
We can avoid war with China by kowtowing to their demands

Currently that means Taiwan but eventually it means much more

I dont want war

But free trade with china and a reduction of the US military makes war almost inevitable
 
Or with other words: In a very stupod way Donald Trump started an economic war with China and China started to react. How many centuries in which way and what will be their final plans we will see ... or better to say we will not see. Our grand- or grandgrand-children will see.
“Stupid” is western globalists who cannot understand that china has been at econmic war with us for decades
 
We can avoid war with China by kowtowing to their demands

Currently that means Taiwan but eventually it means much more

I dont want war

But free trade with china and a reduction of the US military makes war almost inevitable
The Democrats are likely to make war inevitable to distract the people from their bad elections and bad governance. The reduction and general subversion into perversion of the U.S. military makes it impossible to win any war, as we have seen from the last several. What, we lose to Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam and somebody still thinks we can win against CHINA????

Naaaaah, they'll nuke us up and invade through Mexico and take over. Hey, at least that would get the Dems off our backs ----
 
Last edited:
The Democrats are likely to make war inevitable to distract the people from their bad elections and bad governance. The reduction and general subversion into perversion of the U.S. military makes it impossible to win any war, as we have seen from the last several. What, we lose to Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam and somebody still thinks we can win against CHINA????

Naaaaah, they'll nuke us up and invade through Mexico and take over. At least that would get the Dems off our backs ----
I think we have no choice but to resist chinese imperialism

The alternative is too painful to endure

And yes, I dont think china is unbeatable
 
We can avoid war with China by kowtowing to their demands

Currently that means Taiwan but eventually it means much more

I dont want war

But free trade with china and a reduction of the US military makes war almost inevitable

I guess you liked to say a reduction of the free trade with China was inevitable and a reduction of the US military was inevitable. I think Trump had been an unbelievable idiot who bombed the image of the USA down to the ground with his economic wars on no reason to do so and his sanctions-without-any-logic nonsense.

Why just simple did you not buy goods and services from China which you did not like to buy in the USA and why did you just simple not give money to the US military which you don't like to give to the US military? What is the real problem? Muscles in the brain which hamper the ability to think?
 
Last edited:
“Stupid” is western globalists who cannot understand that china has been at econmic war with us for decades

I understood very well that all big companies of the western world forced China to steal their industrial knowledge - but the capitalistic ideology and extreme capitalistic system of the USA never understood this.
 
The Democrats are likely to make war inevitable to distract the people from their bad elections and bad governance. The reduction and general subversion into perversion of the U.S. military makes it impossible to win any war, as we have seen from the last several. What, we lose to Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam and somebody still thinks we can win against CHINA????

Naaaaah, they'll nuke us up and invade through Mexico and take over. At least that would get the Dems off our backs ----

You play something like "chess" - and the Chinese play something like "go". And no one knows the rules.
 
I guess you liked to say a reduction of the free trade with China was inevitable and a reduction of the US military was inevitable. I think Trump had been an unbelievable idiot who bombed the image of the USA down to the ground with his economic wars on no reason to do so and his sanctions-without-any-logic nonsense.

Why just simple did you not buy goods and services from China which you did not like to buy in the USA and why did you just simple not give money to the US military which you don't like to give to the US military? What is the real problem? Muscles in the brain which hamper the ability to think?
Your English is lacking and it makes your argument less understandable

So I will ad-lib

Many influential leaders in business and government embraced globalism and free trade with china hoping that it would cause china to dump communist dictatorship and embrace freedom and peace

And the west looked at 1.4 chinese as future consumers with profits for western companies

But the effort at domesticating china failed and china awoke to be the monster that Napoleon predicted it would be

Trade with china is not good for America or Germany for that matter

It may profit the elite 1% but not the nation as a whole
 
I understood very well that all big companies of the western world forced China to steal their industrial knowledge - but the capitalistic ideology and extreme capitalistic system of the USA never understood this.
What on earth are you babbling about?
 
Many influential leaders in business and government embraced globalism and free trade with china hoping that it would cause china to dump communist dictatorship and embrace freedom and peace
Same logic was applied to Russia some time ago. That economic and political cooperation with the rest of Europe will help democratic processes there and bring peace and stability to Europe. It turned out to be quite the opposite.

I should admit I followed that narrative with regard to Iran and thought that the nuclear deal is damn good thing. The two previous examples say it may not be true.
 
It seems as thought history is repeating itself. We've had WW1 and WW2 now it seems we may be headed for WW3, and Europe is about to suck America into another European War.! Your thoughts.
Actually, if the US had joined Britain and France in opposing Hitler earlier, there might not have been a WWII. The fact that the US is taking a strong stand against Putin's Russia in Ukraine will prevent a larger war between Russia and NATO.
 
China wants war with America

Or peace on china’s terms

If biden is lucid enough to resist he has my support
China doesn't need to go to war. They are buying America, piece by piece, with our own money and the citizens of the US aren't sharp enough to see it. As for war with Russia. China is no friend of Russia. They have been thorns in each others sides for a long time. China looks at any military action that Russia takes against ANYONE as a weakening of Russia. They would love to see the US involved. What is the old saying, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
 
China doesn't need to go to war. They are buying America, piece by piece, with our own money and the citizens of the US aren't sharp enough to see it. As for war with Russia. China is no friend of Russia. They have been thorns in each others sides for a long time. China looks at any military action that Russia takes against ANYONE as a weakening of Russia. They would love to see the US involved. What is the old saying, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
China does have US dollars to invest in America thanks to our trade embalance

But the chinese economy today is only a faint image of what it was 5 or 10 years ago

They have serious internal problems
 
The US is the only country of the 'free' world that can stand against such expanding autocracies like China, Russia and Iran. Or, more correctly, regional alliances against these shitholes can't stand without the US.

That doesn't necessarily mean 'the boot on the ground'. As the war in Ukraine showed, what actually needed is three things - nuclear shield, military hardware supplies, and training and coordination.

It is up to the US people to decide whether to be involved in that or not. But if the US decides to 'wash their hands', the autocracies will fill the gap.
 
Your English is lacking and it makes your argument less understandable

If you would be a German native speaker and you would listen to me than you had really problems because you would need a brain to do so. I wonder myselve for example why we still don't have a Solarwasserstoffspeicherkraftwerk which produces hydrogen in summer with superflous solar power and electricity in times when the sun is not shining.

So I will ad-lib

Many influential leaders in business and government

¿are idiots?

embraced globalism and free trade with china hoping that it would cause china to dump communist dictatorship and embrace freedom and peace

Any name of someone who thought so while he took his daily money shower?

And the west looked at 1.4 chinese as future consumers with profits for western companies

But the effort at domesticating china failed and china awoke to be the monster that Napoleon predicted it would be

Napoleon? Do you speak about that the brutal mass-murderer Napoleon Bonaparte whose absurde ideas about political power you do still favor today?


Trade with china is not good for America or Germany for that matter

No idea what you like to say with such a stupid sentence for stupid people. The USA (= the presidetn of the USA Donald Trump) said for example he doesn't like to see an Mercdeses any longer in the USA because to buy one of the best cars of the world is not good for the USA. By the way: What had happened with his Mercedes 560 SL which he owned from 1987-2014?

It may profit the elite 1% but not the nation as a whole

To understand such a sentence I would have to know much more. In the moment this sentence from you sounds in my ears that you are an US-American socialist who hates everyone who has an money-IQ index higher than 135. But this would be worldwide about 150 million people. I have only a problem with the 15,000 - 150,000 most rich people of the world. Or only a problem with the 150 most rich people? I don't know because I don't know - and don't like to know - them personally.

 
Last edited:
If you would be a German native speaker and you would listen to me than you had really problems because you would need a brain to do so. I wonder myselve for example why we still don't have a Solarwasserstoffspeicherkraftwerk which produces hydrogen in summer with superflous solar power and electricity in times when the sun is not shining.



¿are idiots?



Any name of someone who thought so while he took his daily money shower?



Napoleon? Do you speak about that the brutal mass-murderer Napoleon Bonaparte whose absurde ideas about political power you do still favor today?




No idea what you like to say with such a stupid sentence for stupid people. The USA (= the presidetn of the USA Donald Trump) said for example he doesn't like to see an Mercdeses any longer in the USA because to buy one of the best cars of the world is not good for the USA. By the way: What had happened with his Mercedes 560 SL which he owned from 1987-2014?



To understand such a sentence I would have to know much more. In the moment this sentence from you sounds in my ears that you are an US-American socialist who hates everyone who has an money-IQ index higher than 135. But this would be worldwide about 150 million people. I have only a problem with the 15,000 - 150,000 most rich people of the world. Or only a problem with the 150 most rich people? I don't know because I don't know - and don't like to know - them personally.


I will try to stick to the subject which is china

In spite of your attempts to deflect the subject, trade with china does much damage to western societies

It has grown china and weakened US and German economies

A stronger but no less bitter china plans to dominate the world

Which will bring much misery to everyone
 

Forum List

Back
Top