EU warns repeated boosters will weaken immune system


Not looking so good now vaxx bros. Enjoy your VAIDS and Immuno Erosion.
I sure do hope so, because i havent even had my 1st dose and still cant seem to catch that pesky little Kung Flu. So if 3/4s of the world end up dead because they can no longer be immune even to the common cold, i might be one of the last men standing.

 
I sure do hope so, because i havent even had my 1st dose and still cant seem to catch that pesky little Kung Flu. So if 3/4s of the world end up dead because they can no longer be immune even to the common cold, i might be one of the last men standing.



You'll be in good company, bro. I'm not taking that shit either. No way, fuck that.
 

Not looking so good now vaxx bros. Enjoy your VAIDS and Immuno Erosion.
Additional input from WHO: “WHO experts warned Tuesday that simply repeating booster doses of the original COVID vaccines was not a viable strategy against emerging variants, and called for new jabs that better protect against transmission.”

The timing of WHO releasing this outdated statement is ludicrous. A majority of laypeople have known this information for many months, many months and many have known for over 18 months.

Let the war of words continue between CDC and WHO, along with another major battle for which one has the most authority between National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health (Fauci’s overlord in name only it would appear).



One thing for sure, it’s not boring
to analyze the theatrics of information laced with deceit for profit, horrifying maybe but certainly not boring.

What amounts of monetary payoffs and patent agreements will be made behind the scenes to “determine” who has the most weight? The US government has already dished out bucu tax payer $ to fund CDC under NIH as well as NDF, injecting hefty amounts. Will Biden’s administration handlers determine publicly on paper which of these two entities, NSF or NIH holds the most weight?


Grab your popcorn folks, the s show and public posturing is only gearing up! Of course we can expect smoke and mirrors as they really don’t want this kind of frictional info discussed in the public.
 
How can one go any farther overboard from where the entire #CoronaHoax2020 has been from almost the very beginning?

Th virus is real, the response has been the issue, especially when the world just accepts the first vaccines and we don't hear anything further about improvements a year later (such as a vaccine that provides immunity).
 
Th virus is real, the response has been the issue, especially when the world just accepts the first vaccines and we don't hear anything further about improvements a year later (such as a vaccine that provides immunity).
The major problem is Biden overly
pre-purchased the rushed jabs and associated products: test kits (including many faulty batches), over-purchased monoclonal treatments a few months back now deemed ineffective, huge stockpile of ineffective jabs still sitting on shelves, economic and political motive to keep the virus going well into the future, expected economic gains for investments in peddling “boosters” which are worthless because they’re outdated concoctions, known by most who read.
 
The major problem is Biden overly
pre-purchased the rushed jabs and associated products: test kits (including many faulty batches), over-purchased monoclonal treatments a few months back now deemed ineffective, huge stockpile of ineffective jabs still sitting on shelves, economic and political motive to keep the virus going well into the future, expected economic gains for investments in peddling “boosters” which are worthless because they’re outdated concoctions, known by most who read.

This is the approach all governments had to take due to the high demand. Canada is no different, ditto for Europe.
 
This is the approach all governments had to take due to the high demand. Canada is no different, ditto for Europe.
At the beginning of 2020 agreed. At the beginning of 2021 - questionable considering the updated medical findings within that first year, in 2022 - most questionable due to the lack of any learning curve even occurred, by force it would seem from ethical subset, and yes consumer demand extending beyond the states, many people believing all stated falsehoods, as well as falsehoods accepted due to ignorance.
 
The democrat party has sold their soul to Fuaci and the jab. Therefore, any science indicating otherwise would look poorly upon them.

What we have now is a term called Lysenkoism


Trofim Lysenko against genetics and science-based agriculture in the mid-20th century, rejecting natural selection in favour of a form of Lamarckism, as well as expanding upon the techniques of vernalization and grafting. In time, the term has come to be identified as any deliberate distortion of scientific facts or theories for purposes that are deemed politically, religiously or socially desirable.

More than 3,000 mainstream biologists were dismissed or imprisoned, and numerous scientists were executed in the Soviet campaign to suppress scientific opponents. The president of the Soviet Agriculture Academy, Nikolai Vavilov, who had been Lysenko's mentor, but later denounced him, was sent to prison and died there, while Soviet genetics research was effectively destroyed. Research and teaching in the fields of neurophysiology, cell biology, and many other biological disciplines were harmed or banned.

The government of the Soviet Union (USSR) supported the campaign, and Joseph Stalin personally edited a speech by Lysenko in a way that reflected his support for what would come to be known as Lysenkoism, despite his skepticism toward Lysenko's assertion that all science is class-oriented in nature.[1] Lysenko served as the director of the USSR's Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Other countries of the Eastern Bloc including the People's Republic of Poland, the Republic of Czechoslovakia, and the German Democratic Republic accepted Lysenkoism as the official "new biology", to varying degrees, as did the People's Republic of China for some years.
 
The democrat party has sold their soul to Fuaci and the jab. Therefore, any science indicating otherwise would look poorly upon them.

What we have now is a term called Lysenkoism


Trofim Lysenko against genetics and science-based agriculture in the mid-20th century, rejecting natural selection in favour of a form of Lamarckism, as well as expanding upon the techniques of vernalization and grafting. In time, the term has come to be identified as any deliberate distortion of scientific facts or theories for purposes that are deemed politically, religiously or socially desirable.

More than 3,000 mainstream biologists were dismissed or imprisoned, and numerous scientists were executed in the Soviet campaign to suppress scientific opponents. The president of the Soviet Agriculture Academy, Nikolai Vavilov, who had been Lysenko's mentor, but later denounced him, was sent to prison and died there, while Soviet genetics research was effectively destroyed. Research and teaching in the fields of neurophysiology, cell biology, and many other biological disciplines were harmed or banned.

The government of the Soviet Union (USSR) supported the campaign, and Joseph Stalin personally edited a speech by Lysenko in a way that reflected his support for what would come to be known as Lysenkoism, despite his skepticism toward Lysenko's assertion that all science is class-oriented in nature.[1] Lysenko served as the director of the USSR's Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Other countries of the Eastern Bloc including the People's Republic of Poland, the Republic of Czechoslovakia, and the German Democratic Republic accepted Lysenkoism as the official "new biology", to varying degrees, as did the People's Republic of China for some years.
The United States has also been suppressing information via top screeners/moderators through extra screening techniques for pre-prints. One of the 2 top American medical journals began requiring an extra screening step, but only for COVID-19 papers. That should’ve never happened because preprints are not the same as an accepted journal submission. It was about rejecting all data that didn’t fit the narrative by preventing peer review which is not the way to go about science, in any matter. Science needs dissension to progress and for fine-tuning accuracy.

Jumping to a conclusion and expecting everybody to continue to apply these premature ineffective actions (fake vaccines) as the standard (certainly not gold, more like pond scum) forget it.

Avid readers know what’s up by now with many in the know for over 18 months, and many from the beginning.

There will never be any admittance of failure by these political spokespeople. If they actually did come out publicly to admit their rushed ineptness they’d gain respect. Fauci, CDC, and NIH (needs interim president to speak out separately from Fauci), heads of Pfizer and Moderna, the specific politicians who initially signing on (economic gains investing heavily perhaps) after their behind closed doors meeting. Where are the ethical and honest spokespeople hiding?

Why are these health orgs not concerned about the loss of public trust? That last sentence is more important than any of the other gibberish I’ve written. The answer is most concerning and deserves a full answer.
 
They're indirectly referring to Fau Chi's sugarplum HIV vaccine dreams that Kennedy also documents in his book: Sorensen, Dalgleish and Susrud have supported Malone's statements, here:
'....In our paper, we gave reasons why the virus vector of RNA vector based approaches that are the basis of eight methodologies reviewed in Nature are unlikely to prove immunogenic and why either, but especially RNA vector models may carry significant risk of ADE (antibody dependent enhancement). As we have detailed in QRB-D, we have seen such a story before over thirty years in the failure of all three mainstream vaccine approaches to HIV, which we predicted but were disbelieved.'
 

Forum List

Back
Top