Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
www.bloomberg.com
I sure do hope so, because i havent even had my 1st dose and still cant seem to catch that pesky little Kung Flu. So if 3/4s of the world end up dead because they can no longer be immune even to the common cold, i might be one of the last men standing.Frequent Boosters Spur Warning on Immune Response
European Union regulators warned that frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.
Not looking so good now vaxx bros. Enjoy your VAIDS and Immuno Erosion.
I sure do hope so, because i havent even had my 1st dose and still cant seem to catch that pesky little Kung Flu. So if 3/4s of the world end up dead because they can no longer be immune even to the common cold, i might be one of the last men standing.
I am still waiting to find out the 99.97Z% survivability rate, when catching the original strain. Unless you are a pussy pajama boy who just looking outside catches some STD...You'll be in good company, bro. I'm not taking that shit either. No way, fuck that.
Additional input from WHO: “WHO experts warned Tuesday that simply repeating booster doses of the original COVID vaccines was not a viable strategy against emerging variants, and called for new jabs that better protect against transmission.”Frequent Boosters Spur Warning on Immune Response
European Union regulators warned that frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible.
Not looking so good now vaxx bros. Enjoy your VAIDS and Immuno Erosion.
anthropogenicpollutants.com
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
They should revive the Zyklon brand. They could call the first booster Zyklon C, and subsequent boosters Zyklon D, Zyklon E, and so on.
Christ, let's not go overboard here.
How can one go any farther overboard from where the entire #CoronaHoax2020 has been from almost the very beginning?
The major problem is Biden overlyTh virus is real, the response has been the issue, especially when the world just accepts the first vaccines and we don't hear anything further about improvements a year later (such as a vaccine that provides immunity).
The major problem is Biden overly
pre-purchased the rushed jabs and associated products: test kits (including many faulty batches), over-purchased monoclonal treatments a few months back now deemed ineffective, huge stockpile of ineffective jabs still sitting on shelves, economic and political motive to keep the virus going well into the future, expected economic gains for investments in peddling “boosters” which are worthless because they’re outdated concoctions, known by most who read.
At the beginning of 2020 agreed. At the beginning of 2021 - questionable considering the updated medical findings within that first year, in 2022 - most questionable due to the lack of any learning curve even occurred, by force it would seem from ethical subset, and yes consumer demand extending beyond the states, many people believing all stated falsehoods, as well as falsehoods accepted due to ignorance.This is the approach all governments had to take due to the high demand. Canada is no different, ditto for Europe.
The United States has also been suppressing information via top screeners/moderators through extra screening techniques for pre-prints. One of the 2 top American medical journals began requiring an extra screening step, but only for COVID-19 papers. That should’ve never happened because preprints are not the same as an accepted journal submission. It was about rejecting all data that didn’t fit the narrative by preventing peer review which is not the way to go about science, in any matter. Science needs dissension to progress and for fine-tuning accuracy.The democrat party has sold their soul to Fuaci and the jab. Therefore, any science indicating otherwise would look poorly upon them.
What we have now is a term called Lysenkoism
Lysenkoism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Trofim Lysenko against genetics and science-based agriculture in the mid-20th century, rejecting natural selection in favour of a form of Lamarckism, as well as expanding upon the techniques of vernalization and grafting. In time, the term has come to be identified as any deliberate distortion of scientific facts or theories for purposes that are deemed politically, religiously or socially desirable.
More than 3,000 mainstream biologists were dismissed or imprisoned, and numerous scientists were executed in the Soviet campaign to suppress scientific opponents. The president of the Soviet Agriculture Academy, Nikolai Vavilov, who had been Lysenko's mentor, but later denounced him, was sent to prison and died there, while Soviet genetics research was effectively destroyed. Research and teaching in the fields of neurophysiology, cell biology, and many other biological disciplines were harmed or banned.
The government of the Soviet Union (USSR) supported the campaign, and Joseph Stalin personally edited a speech by Lysenko in a way that reflected his support for what would come to be known as Lysenkoism, despite his skepticism toward Lysenko's assertion that all science is class-oriented in nature.[1] Lysenko served as the director of the USSR's Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Other countries of the Eastern Bloc including the People's Republic of Poland, the Republic of Czechoslovakia, and the German Democratic Republic accepted Lysenkoism as the official "new biology", to varying degrees, as did the People's Republic of China for some years.
