Delta4Embassy
Gold Member
In the movie, the James Bond'esque villian is a billionaire, who, tired of throwing money at the climate change issue wuith zero results 'has an epiphany' and concludes the reason climate change is still occuring is both politicians are more concerned with re-elections, and there's too many people. So logicly he hatches a plan to fix climate change by reducing the number of people.
He makes available a SIM card offering free phone and internet for everyone on Earth for forever. Naturally many take im up on his offer and now equipped with his SIM cards have made themselves vulnerable to his diabolical plan. In the SIm cards is hardware that transmits a wavelength disabling the brain's inhibitors while stimulating the anger area resulting in people violently attacking the first people they see (even their own babies.) The plan being to make just about everyone kill just about everyone else (but those he selects for saving) to reduce the population drastically and thus the impact on the enviroment.
Ignoring the plot hole of what do a small number of people now do about the rotting carcasses in the streets creating a biohazard of Biblical proportions, if you save the planet and humanity by getting others to kill one another, are you in fact a bad person? You're not actually killing anyone, but by messing with their heads, and getting them to kill themselves, you're saving the planet to be sure.
Is this defensible? Do the ends justify the means if nothing else is likely to ever work?
He makes available a SIM card offering free phone and internet for everyone on Earth for forever. Naturally many take im up on his offer and now equipped with his SIM cards have made themselves vulnerable to his diabolical plan. In the SIm cards is hardware that transmits a wavelength disabling the brain's inhibitors while stimulating the anger area resulting in people violently attacking the first people they see (even their own babies.) The plan being to make just about everyone kill just about everyone else (but those he selects for saving) to reduce the population drastically and thus the impact on the enviroment.
Ignoring the plot hole of what do a small number of people now do about the rotting carcasses in the streets creating a biohazard of Biblical proportions, if you save the planet and humanity by getting others to kill one another, are you in fact a bad person? You're not actually killing anyone, but by messing with their heads, and getting them to kill themselves, you're saving the planet to be sure.
Is this defensible? Do the ends justify the means if nothing else is likely to ever work?