She didnāt āturn on her fatherā. She told the J6 committee to fuck off.What kind of daughter turns on her own father?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She didnāt āturn on her fatherā. She told the J6 committee to fuck off.What kind of daughter turns on her own father?
a good one... assuming it is a reprimand as you say but I don't assume that.. don't trust liberals one bit...
all i heeard was that he said she didn't follow all the fraud evidence..
but all this is rather moot in light of thefact
that there IS
considerable evidence...
so no matter who tells me there was no fraud, I am not only not buying it but calling that person a
LIAR
+
She admitted that the Orange Fraud lostShe didnāt āturn on her fatherā. She told the J6 committee to fuck off.
Okay good donāt vote in the next election! Itās all rigged anyway!And yet it turns out Barr was full of shit.
The Feds weāre in on it and refused to investigate.
The audits and actual independent investigators have proven mass fraud. 2000 Mules cannot be debunked. Game is up.
What evidence does she have?She admitted that the Orange Fraud lost
Can you do that?
She didnāt āturn on her fatherā. She told the J6 committee to fuck off.
And it's not as if Barr is The One And Only source of information she has accessed for something this important.She admitted that the Orange Fraud lost
Can you do that?
They knowAnd it's not as if Barr is The One And Only source of information she has accessed for something this important.
Ivanka knows. The enablers in the Orange Circle know. The GQP politicians know. The GQP politicos know.
But the rubes don't know. And that's ALL that matters.
It must really suThey knew. They know. But it doesn't matter. The con is working.
I actually wish they would have burned it down and killed a lot of them mother fuckers.....then it would have been worth itItās already been proven President Trump offered 20,000 National Guard. Pelosi turned it down.
Pelosi and the Dems wanted violence. They were hoping for the crowd to burn down the building like BLM would had, and to execute members of Congress like BLM would had. Instead they stayed between the ropes and took selfies.
View attachment 656159
You know you loved this happened...lolololAnd it's not as if Barr is The One And Only source of information she has accessed for something this important.
Ivanka knows. The enablers in the Orange Circle know. The GQP politicians know. The GQP politicos know.
But the rubes don't know. And that's ALL that matters.
The saddest thing is when people are so politicized they don't even care the previous guy attempted to illegally overturn a free and fair election to install himself as prez against the will of the majority.The saddest thing is when people are so politicized, they do not even know they lived better under the previous guy or even care.
Nope. The post about Ginni was meant to drive home the point there was a lot more to the coup attempt than the Capital riot. In her opening comments, Liz Cheney mentioned the committee will provide evidence explaining the 7 facets to Trump's efforts to steal the election. So your myopic focus on the 1/6 riot is much too narrow in its gaze. I suggest you read Judge Carter's 44 page memo, the link for which is provided here.......ah i guess when you failed to show that trump conspired and organized the riotā¦you got to somehow try and blame justice thomas wife doing lobbyingā¦
geez
oh iām looking forward to it! wow some folks send some emailsā¦total coupNope. The post about Ginni was meant to drive home the point there was a lot more to the coup attempt than the Capital riot. In her opening comments, Liz Cheney mentioned the committee will provide evidence explaining the 7 facets to Trump's efforts to steal the election. So your myopic focus on the 1/6 riot is much too narrow in its gaze. I suggest you read Judge Carter's 44 page memo, the link for which is provided here.......
Washington ā A federal judge in California on Monday ordered conservative attorney John Eastman to turn over a tranche of emails to the House select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, and found that former President Donald Trump "more likely than not" illegally tried to impede official congressional proceedings on the day of the attack.
In his 44-page decision involving the documents from Eastman, a former law professor at Chapman University who played a key role in Trump's efforts to reverse the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, U.S. District Judge David Carter wrote that based on the evidence, he finds it is "more likely than not that President Trump corruptly attempted to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021."
![]()
Judge finds Trump "more likely than not" illegally tried to obstruct Congress on January 6
Carter ordered Eastman to turn over 101 documents to the House select committee investigating the January 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol.www.cbsnews.com
Here's an excerpt..........
In response to alleged fraud, Dr. Eastman researched and planned a strategy for
President Trump to win the election. Just after Christmas, Dr. Eastman wrote a now-public twopage
memo proposing that Vice President Pence refuse to count certified electoral votes from
states contested by the Trump campaign: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.22 The memo outlines the two ways in which Dr. Eastmanās plan
ensures āPresident Trump is re-elected.ā23 If Vice President Pence refused to count electoral
votes from all seven contested states, President Trump would win 232 votes to 222.24
Alternatively, if Congress claimed that a candidate could not win without reaching 270 votes,
Vice President Pence could send the election to the Republican-majority House of
Representatives, which would then elect President Trump.25 The memo emphasizes that ā[t]he
main thing here is that Pence should do this without asking for permission ā either from a vote
of the joint session or from the Court.ā26
Gosh, that's just more gaslighting. She said Barr's determination that fraud claims were bullshyte "effected her perspective" and that she had respect for Barr so "I accepted what he was saying.ā Meaning she accepted there was no widespread fraud. Meaning she understood your Orange Messiah was spewing bullshyte about the election.She didnāt āturn on her fatherā. She told the J6 committee to fuck off.
Much more than writing a few e-mails. It was a conspiracy to defraud the American public by stealing the election.oh iām looking forward to it! wow some folks send some emailsā¦total coup
hahah a lawyer writing a legal opinion s not a conspiracy to defraud anyoneMuch more than writing a few e-mails. It was a conspiracy to defraud the American public by stealing the election.
In response to alleged fraud, Dr. Eastman researched and planned a strategy for
President Trump to win the election. Just after Christmas, Dr. Eastman wrote a now-public twopage
memo proposing that Vice President Pence refuse to count certified electoral votes from
states contested by the Trump campaign: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.22 The memo outlines the two ways in which Dr. Eastmanās plan
ensures āPresident Trump is re-elected.ā23 If Vice President Pence refused to count electoral
votes from all seven contested states, President Trump would win 232 votes to 222.24
Alternatively, if Congress claimed that a candidate could not win without reaching 270 votes,
Vice President Pence could send the election to the Republican-majority House of
Representatives, which would then elect President Trump.25 The memo emphasizes that ā[t]he
main thing here is that Pence should do this without asking for permission ā either from a vote
of the joint session or from the Court.ā26
Putting aside even Eastman admitted his plan was illegal, the plan.........made a conspiracy because he entered in to it with Trump.........was designed to overturn the election results. Election results Trump knew were legitimate.hahah a lawyer writing a legal opinion s not a conspiracy to defraud anyone
It was a BLUEPRINT...that was the core of the couphahah a lawyer writing a legal opinion s not a conspiracy to defraud anyone
Exactly.It was a BLUEPRINT...that was the core of the coup
hahah a legal opinion from a lawyer..is not a coup..just sadIt was a BLUEPRINT...that was the core of the coup