Eric Rush, FOX regular, calls for military coup against Obama

So? this is important why?

We the people should've run Obama and his comrades in arms out the white house with pitch forks in hand...Our Reps in congress won't listen to us and Impeach the tyrant thug running all over us and them
 
So? this is important why?

We the people should've run Obama and his comrades in arms out the white house with pitch forks in hand...Our Reps in congress won't listen to us and Impeach the tyrant thug running all over us and them

More faux indifference, Steph?

If this isn't important, why did you start a thread on this:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/334688-operation-american-spring.html

and also post on this thread:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...ers-planning-suicide-by-cop-rally-in-d-c.html

with even MORE faux indifference. :eusa_eh:
 
He's not wrong. He's right. It should have been done by now.

It's against the law to even suggest it.

There would be no grounds for a coup anyway -

Socialized medicine? The birth certificate? Benghazi? Seriously???

NSA usurpation of the 4th Amendment.

Eminent Domain (Kelo vs New London style).

Taxed to death (this starts MOST revolutions throughout history).
 
He's not wrong. He's right. It should have been done by now.

It's against the law to even suggest it.

There would be no grounds for a coup anyway -

Socialized medicine? The birth certificate? Benghazi? Seriously???

NSA usurpation of the 4th Amendment.

Has been going on since the NSA was formed. Nothing to do with Obama.


Eminent Domain (Kelo vs New London style).

Kelo v. New London was also before Obama, and eminent domain is a local government thing, not a federal issue.

Taxed to death (this starts MOST revolutions throughout history).

Federal taxes are at their lowest point in the last 125 years.
 
He's not wrong. He's right. It should have been done by now.

There we have it folks; another loyal all American hero who wants to totally destroy the idea of free and fair elections if the wrong man is in the job.

Freedom, democracy and the constitution (Unless a ****** is in the white house). :cuckoo:
 
He's not wrong. He's right. It should have been done by now.

There we have it folks; another loyal all American hero who wants to totally destroy the idea of free and fair elections if the wrong man is in the job.

Freedom, democracy and the constitution (Unless a ****** is in the white house). :cuckoo:

omg, change your diaper
good grief:eusa_hand:
 
All the msm is rigged. This is just another stunt to make people on the right think that this president might be thrown out. Same distraction crap you get over at CNN, MSNBC or the regular msm. They are all part of the establishment.......and so many people out there are duped ito this thought that there is some kind of ideological struggle going on out there and one side is going to win over another. LMAO......all the sheep are being herded very effectively.


Television news, the stage play « Jon Rappoport's Blog

The individual vs. the illusion of consensus reality « Jon Rappoport's Blog


Ray McGovern, a retired CIA agent whose expertise was the old Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc countries says the propaganda coming out of Fox News is at the same level as Pravda. But I suspect most Russians knew Pravda was propaganda.

Fox_sheep.jpg


"Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us and now we're discovering we work for Fox. And this balance here has been completely reversed. The thing that sustains a strong Fox network is the thing that undermines a strong Republican party."
David Frum - Speechwriter for George W. Bush
 
Hmmmmmmmmm............. Not a wise thing, legally.

Bloody stupid. Treason charges, anyone?

Inciting people to revolution is treason.

And if you've got that kind of platform, then it ought not be dismissed as mere hyperbole.

FOX ought to have it license revoked.

The corporation itself ought to have its charter lifted.

It's one thing to complain about the government and quite another to call for a revolution on TV
 
Really, they should have their license revoked over some story from RAW STORY?

get real and think for yourselves
 
He claims that he wants to accomplish this within the means of the law -

There is no provision that would legally allow a coup.

The guy is a complete idiot and he will absolutely be getting a visit from the men in the black cars.

During said visit - Eric Rush will display NONE of his tough-guy bravado and will probably at some juncture claim that he "actually likes Obama."

How to legally dissolve the U.S. Federal Government

Article Five
Constitutional Convention to Amend the U.S. Constitution, to dissolve the Federal Government. Thirty four Legislatures would be needed to make such a call and Thirty eight legislatures from the states is all that is needed to ratify such an amendment.
 
He claims that he wants to accomplish this within the means of the law -

There is no provision that would legally allow a coup.

The guy is a complete idiot and he will absolutely be getting a visit from the men in the black cars.

During said visit - Eric Rush will display NONE of his tough-guy bravado and will probably at some juncture claim that he "actually likes Obama."

How to legally dissolve the U.S. Federal Government

Article Five
Constitutional Convention to Amend the U.S. Constitution, to dissolve the Federal Government. Thirty four Legislatures would be needed to make such a call and Thirty eight legislatures from the states is all that is needed to ratify such an amendment.

Good work, but if you have to dissolve the entire nation just to remove a president, it isn't really the same as a military coup, is it?
 
He claims that he wants to accomplish this within the means of the law -

There is no provision that would legally allow a coup.

The guy is a complete idiot and he will absolutely be getting a visit from the men in the black cars.

During said visit - Eric Rush will display NONE of his tough-guy bravado and will probably at some juncture claim that he "actually likes Obama."

How to legally dissolve the U.S. Federal Government

Article Five
Constitutional Convention to Amend the U.S. Constitution, to dissolve the Federal Government. Thirty four Legislatures would be needed to make such a call and Thirty eight legislatures from the states is all that is needed to ratify such an amendment.

Good work, but if you have to dissolve the entire nation just to remove a president, it isn't really the same as a military coup, is it?

It's not just a president, but most of the elected in D.C. It's not just a president but his policies that must go. It's not just a president but the tyranny that he brings, it's not just a president but the out of touch with the will of the people that he negates.
 
So? this is important why?

We the people should've run Obama and his comrades in arms out the white house with pitch forks in hand...Our Reps in congress won't listen to us and Impeach the tyrant thug running all over us and them

The right...America's Taliban.

Insurgency

Friday, February 6, 2009

Texas Republican Congressman Pete Sessions compares GOP strategy to Taliban insurgency

zoyqE.jpg


"Insurgency, we understand perhaps a little bit more because of the Taliban, and that is that they went about systematically understanding how to disrupt and change a person's entire processes. And these Taliban -- I'm not trying to say the Republican Party is the Taliban. No, that's not what we're saying. I'm saying an example of how you go about [sic] is to change a person from their messaging to their operations to their frontline message. And we need to understand that insurgency may be required when the other side, the House leadership, does not follow the same commands, which we entered the game with."

Congressman Pete Sessions Compares House Republicans To Taliban | Capitol Annex
 
Let's see:

Abraham Lincoln (R) - assassinated.
James Garfield (R) - assassinated.
William McKinley (R) - assassinated.
John Kennedy (D) - assassinated.
Ronald Reagan (R) - assassination attempt.

So, President of which party is in greater jeopardy?

Or in other words, adherents of which party are more prone to violence?
 
Let's see:

Abraham Lincoln (R) - assassinated.
James Garfield (R) - assassinated.
William McKinley (R) - assassinated.
John Kennedy (D) - assassinated.
Ronald Reagan (R) - assassination attempt.

So, President of which party is in greater jeopardy?

Or in other words, adherents of which party are more prone to violence?

Not that this means anything but which assassination or attempted assassination was politically motivated?
Reagan's wasn't politically motivated but maybe the others were.
 
Listen up you far right wing reactionary lemmings: you have to win elections.

If you rise up, your neighbors will have no problem suppressing you without federal or NG help.
 

Forum List

Back
Top