Zone1 Equality is downsizing religions, as parent refuse to downsize their love for an LGBTQ+ or female child.

[Blues Man]

It's existed, it's not normal.

If it has ALWAYS exited then its existence is normal

 

[Blues Man]

You have never known one that would admit to you that they would show a 7 year old how to use a butt plug.

Someone is bringing sex toys and porn featuring children to schools. Who? Throw them out, all of them.

Again that was ONE PRIVATE SCHOOL. Stop pretending that it happens everywhere.

 

[martybegan]

It is normal for a percentage of the human population to be born with birth defects

But it isn't the normal human condition. Or default condition. That's why they are called defects.

 

[martybegan]

So what? they are not part of the celebration. They won't be there.

And you have yet to show me where in any bible that it says "Thou shalt not engage in business transactions with sinners ( especially queers)"

If it's not part of the religion's actual doctrine then it is not part of the free exercise of that religion.

The are part of it by providing a good or service to it.

I don't have to. They don't have to. It's enough that they can show their religion finds homosexuality to be sinful.

That is a construct created by you, because you want to fuck with religious people while pretending they are the bad guys in this situation.

 

[martybegan]

If it has ALWAYS exited then its existence is normal

No, it isn't normal or default for the standard unit of the given set.

 

[Mac-7]

If it has ALWAYS exited then its existence is normal

Just as some parts off an assembly line are going to be defective

But that does not make them desirable

 

[Blues Man]

But it isn't the normal human condition. Or default condition. That's why they are called defects.

Yes it is a normal part of the human population.

There have ALWAYS been children born with birth defects . There ALWAYS will be children born with birth defects .

When something ALWAYS occurs to no matter what degree that occurrence is normal on the continuum of all possible outcomes.

We're getting nowhere here and at this point we have to agree to disagree and stop wasting each other's time.

 

[Blues Man]

Just as some parts off an assembly line are going to be defective

But that does not make them desirable

Whether they are desirable is irrelevant as far as their existence is concerned.

 

[martybegan]

Yes it is a normal part of the human population.

There have ALWAYS been children born with birth defects . There ALWAYS will be children born with birth defects .

When something ALWAYS occurs to no matter what degree that occurrence is normal on the continuum of all possible outcomes.

We're getting nowhere here and at this point we have to agree to disagree and stop wasting each other's time.

That they are defects makes them abnormal, because to be a defect you need to know what is expected.


It is expected that an organism that reproduces sexually should be attracted to the opposite sex to aid in the desire to reproduce. Anything else is a defect.

 

[Blues Man]

The are part of it by providing a good or service to it.

I don't have to. They don't have to. It's enough that they can show their religion finds homosexuality to be sinful.

That is a construct created by you, because you want to fuck with religious people while pretending they are the bad guys in this situation.

No they are not part of it.

Is the person who made the tie you wear to a wedding part of the ceremony ?

Of course not.

A cake is just a fucking cake

 

[Blues Man]

That they are defects makes them abnormal, because to be a defect you need to know what is expected.


It is expected that an organism that reproduces sexually should be attracted to the opposite sex to aid in the desire to reproduce. Anything else is a defect.

We're getting nowhere here and at this point we have to agree to disagree and stop wasting each other's time.

 

[martybegan]

No they are not part of it.

Is the person who made the tie you wear to a wedding part of the ceremony ?

Of course not.

A cake is just a fucking cake

The tie isn't made specifically for that wedding, the cake in the question is.

This cake was contracted specifically for this SSM wedding reception.

 

[martybegan]

We're getting nowhere here and at this point we have to agree to disagree and stop wasting each other's time.

You first.

 

[Mac-7]

Whether they are desirable is irrelevant as far as their existence is concerned.

Bank robbers exist

So do noisy neighbors

And both fall into the undesirable category along with homosexuals

 

[Blues Man]

The tie isn't made specifically for that wedding, the cake in the question is.

This cake was contracted specifically for this SSM wedding reception.

So then if a person had a tie hand made for the event is the person who made the tie part of the event?

The answer is still no.

And it doesn't matter where the cake is eaten it's just a fucking cake

 

[Blues Man]

You first.

I'm done with this topic.

Does that make you feel like a winner?

If it does then you're pathetic

 

[martybegan]

So then if a person had a tie hand made for the event is the person who made the tie part of the event?

The answer is still no.

And it doesn't matter where the cake is eaten it's just a fucking cake

That would be more accurate. and that custom tie maker should have the right not to participate as well.

That's your view, not the baker's.

You fall for the standard progressive failure, you can't even admit that another viewpoint is valid, thus making your view the only "correct" one, and thus everyone else has to think JUST LIKE YOU or suffer the consequences.

 

[martybegan]

I'm done with this topic.

Does that make you feel like a winner?

If it does then you're pathetic

Usually I would give up when a post devolves into namecalling, but this one has stayed on the merits.

 

[GreatestIam]

You must have some skin in the game.

Are you even aware of the Golden Rule?

Regards
DL

 

[GreatestIam]

Just as some parts off an assembly line are going to be defective

But that does not make them desirable

So this is your idea of moral equivalence.

Comparing people to think for a moral view.

You are too morally stupid for words.

Quite the mental defect.

Regards
DL