Equality? Divorcees in NY seeking fertility payments from ex husbands

[novasteve]

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/07/opinion/alimony-for-your-eggs.html?ref=opinion&_r=0

I love feminists, they claim they want equality when al lthey seek out are special privileges. Pathetic.

 

[JakeStarkey]

 

[novasteve]

Any equality libs have any comments?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

I warned folk that this was coming.

Next step will be assigning fault in divorce cases.
Like they did in the UK.
If a man cheated, he was at fault, a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Probably be criminalized into the bargain.

If a woman cheated, it could only be because her husband was at fault because he was such a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.

Visits to his kids would be supervised by a social worker( paid for out of dads pocket).
Any physical contact between father and child would be challenged as suspicious.

That's the future.

And it's not true, Chicken Little.

 

[bianco]

I warned folk that this was coming.

Next step will be assigning fault in divorce cases.
Like they did in the UK.
If a man cheated, he was at fault, a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Probably be criminalized into the bargain.

If a woman cheated, it could only be because her husband was at fault because he was such a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.

Visits to his kids would be supervised by a social worker( paid for out of dads pocket).
Any physical contact between father and child would be challenged as suspicious.

That's the future.

UK?
It was much the same in Australia [little UK, used to be].
But, bianco-ilk put a stop to it, demanded equal rights for men, and got them.

Mind you, 'people' are trying to blame White heterosexual males for everything they perceive to be wrong in Australia...and the world.

 

[Vox]

yet one more deterrent from entering the marriage

and then the stupid greedy women will complain in their letters to the magazines - men don't want to commit

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/07/opinion/alimony-for-your-eggs.html?ref=opinion&_r=0

I love feminists, they claim they want equality when al lthey seek out are special privileges. Pathetic.

Obviously you didn’t read or understand the linked article:

Legal experts like Kevin Noble Maillard of Syracuse University speculate that a woman’s missed opportunities to have a baby during a marriage could be viewed as a form of “sacrifice” for which she should be compensated (in much the same way that a woman who put her husband through law school could expect to be compensated if he divorced her just before he reaped the financial rewards of the degree). And it helps rectify one of life’s greatest biological injustices: that men but not women can typically start a family well into middle age and beyond.

There exists legal precedent and context with regard to the request being made in the divorce settlement, having nothing to do with ‘feminism’ or wanting something ‘both ways.’

 

[Vox]

yet one more deterrent from entering the marriage

and then the stupid greedy women will complain in their letters to the magazines - men don't want to commit

You can still be robbed blind, even if you don't marry.
Do not accept mail in your girlfriends name at your address.

One LORD P, we shall call him.
Actually the son of LORD P, a hereditary peer in the UK, lived in a home that had been in his family for 5 centuries.
He had a girlfriend of 6 weeks who slept over a couple or 3 nights a week.
Once she had a new cell phone mailed to her at his home.
That established residency and cohabitation.
Under law there's was suddenly a marriage under common law.

Rob got home from work one day( Rob/Robin, the lords son), he was a social worker, his clients were very young criminals, most famously the two lads who killed Jamie Bulger.
He was locked out, the locks changed.
It got to court, he was offered the option of buying the home back from her at a cost of millions or allowing her to keep it..
Social workers tend not to have millions.
She took the house.
Last I remember, she was during him for help paying the property tax!!
Don't know how that ended up!!

The same lunacy has started here, it's only a matter of time!!

***philosophically***

we'll be extinct soon and no nukes to be blamed for.

 

[bianco]

yet one more deterrent from entering the marriage

and then the stupid greedy women will complain in their letters to the magazines - men don't want to commit

Exactly.

The greedy women/feminazis could always just marry each other.

 

[Vox]

yet one more deterrent from entering the marriage

and then the stupid greedy women will complain in their letters to the magazines - men don't want to commit

Exactly.

The greedy women/feminazis could always just marry each other.

actually that is what they end up with and that is partially the reason why they are so full of hatred against men in particular.
Homosexual men don't hate women except selected cases.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

yet one more deterrent from entering the marriage

and then the stupid greedy women will complain in their letters to the magazines - men don't want to commit

You can still be robbed blind, even if you don't marry.
Do not accept mail in your girlfriends name at your address.

One LORD P, we shall call him.
Actually the son of LORD P, a hereditary peer in the UK, lived in a home that had been in his family for 5 centuries.
He had a girlfriend of 6 weeks who slept over a couple or 3 nights a week.
Once she had a new cell phone mailed to her at his home.
That established residency and cohabitation.
Under law there's was suddenly a marriage under common law.

Rob got home from work one day( Rob/Robin, the lords son), he was a social worker, his clients were very young criminals, most famously the two lads who killed Jamie Bulger.
He was locked out, the locks changed.
It got to court, he was offered the option of buying the home back from her at a cost of millions or allowing her to keep it..
Social workers tend not to have millions.
She took the house.
Last I remember, she was during him for help paying the property tax!!
Don't know how that ended up!!

The same lunacy has started here, it's only a matter of time!!

 

[Luissa]

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/07/opinion/alimony-for-your-eggs.html?ref=opinion&_r=0

I love feminists, they claim they want equality when al lthey seek out are special privileges. Pathetic.

You are pathetic.

 

[Luissa]

They hate for women coming from Pauli, Steve, and Vox is hilarious.

 

[Luissa]

I warned folk that this was coming.

Next step will be assigning fault in divorce cases.
Like they did in the UK.
If a man cheated, he was at fault, a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Probably be criminalized into the bargain.

If a woman cheated, it could only be because her husband was at fault because he was such a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.

Visits to his kids would be supervised by a social worker( paid for out of dads pocket).
Any physical contact between father and child would be challenged as suspicious.

That's the future.

Why do you hate women?

 

[Papageorgio]

I warned folk that this was coming.

Next step will be assigning fault in divorce cases.
Like they did in the UK.
If a man cheated, he was at fault, a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Probably be criminalized into the bargain.

If a woman cheated, it could only be because her husband was at fault because he was such a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.

Visits to his kids would be supervised by a social worker( paid for out of dads pocket).
Any physical contact between father and child would be challenged as suspicious.

That's the future.

UK?
It was much the same in Australia [little UK, used to be].
But, bianco-ilk put a stop to it, demanded equal rights for men, and got them.

Mind you, 'people' are trying to blame White heterosexual males for everything they perceive to be wrong in Australia...and the world.

They are

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Translated as " Let's deny this as loud as possible, people always listen to the loudest person"!
All fact.
The Lord Priors son, Robin.

I'm not denying that you're making shit up.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Nope..................sorry......................but the women should NOT be allowed to hold the first husbands liable for their fertility.

Besides.................there are plenty of times where it's the man's impotence that renders a couple unable to conceive.

Should the men be allowed to sue for damages because they married a castrating *****?

 

[editec]

Lots of woman haters here..mostly they pretend to be straights, too.

I think they're not.

 

[novasteve]

Libs is that your argument? Pointing out inequality equals hatred? By your logic calling for gay marriage means you hate straights

 

[JakeStarkey]

Lots of woman haters here..mostly they pretend to be straights, too.

I think they're not.

Where is the hatred of women, idiot?
None.
Pointing out the stupidity of an insane court case is not hatred of women.

Recognizing that racism cuts both ways is not racist
Being a liberal is fanaticism.

And Pauli shows us the flip side of liberal fanaticism is reactionary fanaticism, much like communism and libertarianism are flip sides to each other.