- Mar 27, 2012
- 15,414
- 6,530
- 390
She's the queen of the insipid one-liner insult. She goes to websites to find them.
Insulting you doesn't take a lot of thought
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
She's the queen of the insipid one-liner insult. She goes to websites to find them.
2-3 paragraphs, to make one's point, with a link then a personal argument for or against it. Its called "sourcing". google it . You don't source, you're not worth my timeIf you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
It is true that someone who takes an entire article, or anything over the aforementioned length, and copynpaste's it here w/ very-little-to-no personal commentary IS a mouth-breather.
90% of the "sources" your side links are lefty twat opinion pieces with the same intellectual capacity as a broken toaster.
90% of those sites are further linked to the original sources.
2-3 paragraphs, to make one's point, with a link then a personal argument for or against it. Its called "sourcing". google it . You don't source, you're not worth my timeIf you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
It is true that someone who takes an entire article, or anything over the aforementioned length, and copynpaste's it here w/ very-little-to-no personal commentary IS a mouth-breather.
90% of the "sources" your side links are lefty twat opinion pieces with the same intellectual capacity as a broken toaster.
90% of those sites are further linked to the original sources.
Other, lefty twat opinion pieces, or they take the original source and spin it so tightly it can't breathe.
how did you get a pic of PoliticalChic's keyboard?
2-3 paragraphs, to make one's point, with a link then a personal argument for or against it. Its called "sourcing". google it . You don't source, you're not worth my timeIf you want to make a point or express your opinion, fine. But simply posting articles that others have written is the height of intellectual vacuity. It is obvious that many of these posters haven't even read, much less understood, these articles. Instead, they see a catchy (and usually misleading) headline and think that this confers some sort of legitimacy to their preconceived beliefs.
Why not try composing your own thoughts first, and then post a coherent message?
It is true that someone who takes an entire article, or anything over the aforementioned length, and copynpaste's it here w/ very-little-to-no personal commentary IS a mouth-breather.
90% of the "sources" your side links are lefty twat opinion pieces with the same intellectual capacity as a broken toaster.
90% of those sites are further linked to the original sources.
Other, lefty twat opinion pieces, or they take the original source and spin it so tightly it can't breathe.
You mean like Breitbart or the Daily Caller.
You're asking people to THINK for themselves.
This is how a picture a lot of posters here: