Elon Musk……..Humanitarian

Elon Musk…….Richest man on earth
What will be his legacy?

Bill Gates, the former richest man on earth is no longer the richest because he gave away his wealth. He formed the Gates Foundation with the intent of using his wealth to help people suffering around the world. Vaccinations, clean water, sanitation….all to reduce famine and plague

Elon Musk will be known as the man who dismantled USAID and stopped the US from providing food, healthcare, housing to starving people around the world.
You lie without blinking an eye.
 
We live in reality, you live in a fantasy world, where Billionaires are your buddies, looking out for you.
Even when I was a democrat I never thought that. So this what Democrats now claim? Or is it just you?

Billionaires got that much net worth by creating companies that hire workers. And to thank them, the Federal Government treats them as the enemy, as you did above.
 
That’s it?
Terrorists occupy a shelter provided by USAID

That means we should halt all food shipments, medical aid, housing to starving people

USAID announces nearly all direct hires will be placed on administrative leave​

The agency said all direct hires, “with the exception of designated personnel responsible for mission-critical functions,” would be placed on administrative leave.
 
LOL, Elon Musk will be known as the greatest entrepreneur of his generation and a renaissance genius, and if he keeps going the way he's going with DOGE the man who saved the United States from fiscal disaster.

I suspect he'll be okay with that legacy.

Also -

Elon Musk Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize. - For defending free speech.​

 
That’s it?
Terrorists occupy a shelter provided by USAID
Propaganda filmed and provided by your tax dollars.
Given that Trump was a BFF to Epstein, hard to take you se4iously
Routinely tosses His BFF's from His club?

It is the Christian thing to do.
There were thieves in the Temple back then too...................so the democrats resurrected the Temple again so they can go back to their old ways.

Show us the proof of what they weren't providing.
I think what's going to be really cool will be following the money tree............dems dark money, Act Blue.....funding for anti-trump lawfare.....etc.

Boy this is going to be neato.

Why do you think the dems are coming unglued?
 
You literally just make shit up and start screaming at the sky. This is why normal people call you guys "moonbats"
WNksnZKahGe2I.jpg



He's trying to turn legislation that gives American workers the right to unionize. Their interests aren't compatible with those of the working class. Even Adam Smith the father of Industrial Age capitalism admitted that:

"What are the common wages of labor, depends everywhere upon the contract usually made between those two parties, whose interests are by no means the same. The workmen desire to get as much, the masters to give as little as possible. The former are disposed to combine (To form labor unions) in order to raise, the latter in order to lower the wages of labor.


It is not, however, difficult to foresee which of the two parties must, upon all ordinary occasions, have the advantage in the dispute, and force the other into a compliance with their terms. The masters, being fewer in number, can combine (In the form of chambers of commerce, industry-specific associations, and guilds, super-PACs, non-profit front organizations/NGOs, armies of lobbyists bribing politicians in the halls of government, think tanks staffed by Ivy league educated analysts and scholars who write the papers and legislation that they hand to the lobbyists, to give to their cronies in Congress) much more easily; and the law, besides, authorises, or at least does not prohibit their combinations, while it prohibits those of the workmen.

We have no acts of parliament against combining to lower the price of work; but many against combining to raise it. In all such disputes the masters can hold out much longer. A landlord, a farmer, a master manufacturer, or merchant, though they did not employ a single workman, could generally live a year or two upon the stocks which they have already acquired. Many workmen could not subsist a week, few could subsist a month, and scarce any a year without employment. In the long-run the workman may be as necessary to his master as his master is to him, but the necessity is not so immediate.

We rarely hear, it has been said, of the combinations of masters, though frequently of those of workmen. But whoever imagines, upon this account, that masters rarely combine, is as ignorant of the world as of the subject. Masters are always and every where in a sort of tacit, but constant and uniform combination, not to raise the wages of labour above their actual rate. To violate this combination is every where a most unpopular action, and a sort of reproach to a master among his neighbours and equals." (Wealth Of Nations - Book I, Chapter VIII)

Emphasis is mine.


What part of:


whose interests are by no means the same.
...didn't you understand? They're not your buddies, they're your masters. Are you into having "masters"?

United_We_Bargain_Divided_We_Beg_Two_Forearms_in_Unison_By_DonkeyHotey.jpg


lincoln-labor-capital.jpg
 
Yeah… he’ll save pennies and cause immense harm

Brilliant
The Democrats are throwing awfully big hissy fits over "pennies", people getting nervous over Elon & Co. going through their books.

Daddy's Home. :)
 
You literally just make shit up and start screaming at the sky. This is why normal people call you guys "moonbats"
They've got nothing Else; President Trump and crew are steam rolling them and this is just the first two weeks.

Imagine how bat shit crazy they'll be after 4 years of this pace.:omg:
 
The Democrats are throwing awfully big hissy fits over "pennies", people getting nervous over Elon & Co. going through their books.

Daddy's Home. :)
I am nervous over a partisan billionaire deciding how our country should operate

The Golden Rule
He who has the Gold makes the rules
 
I am nervous over a partisan billionaire deciding how our country should operate
No reason to be nervous, Elon Musk and DOGE are acting under the direction and authority of POTUS, who in turn is acting under the direction and the authority of voters, not to mention everything DOGE has been doing has been completely transparent.

Do all the billionaires that control and direct the Democrat Party and dictate to them how our country should operate from smoke filled back rooms make you nervous?
 
View attachment 1074798


He's trying to turn legislation that gives American workers the right to unionize. Their interests aren't compatible with those of the working class. Even Adam Smith the father of Industrial Age capitalism admitted that:

"What are the common wages of labor, depends everywhere upon the contract usually made between those two parties, whose interests are by no means the same. The workmen desire to get as much, the masters to give as little as possible. The former are disposed to combine (To form labor unions) in order to raise, the latter in order to lower the wages of labor.


It is not, however, difficult to foresee which of the two parties must, upon all ordinary occasions, have the advantage in the dispute, and force the other into a compliance with their terms. The masters, being fewer in number, can combine (In the form of chambers of commerce, industry-specific associations, and guilds, super-PACs, non-profit front organizations/NGOs, armies of lobbyists bribing politicians in the halls of government, think tanks staffed by Ivy league educated analysts and scholars who write the papers and legislation that they hand to the lobbyists, to give to their cronies in Congress) much more easily; and the law, besides, authorises, or at least does not prohibit their combinations, while it prohibits those of the workmen.

We have no acts of parliament against combining to lower the price of work; but many against combining to raise it. In all such disputes the masters can hold out much longer. A landlord, a farmer, a master manufacturer, or merchant, though they did not employ a single workman, could generally live a year or two upon the stocks which they have already acquired. Many workmen could not subsist a week, few could subsist a month, and scarce any a year without employment. In the long-run the workman may be as necessary to his master as his master is to him, but the necessity is not so immediate.

We rarely hear, it has been said, of the combinations of masters, though frequently of those of workmen. But whoever imagines, upon this account, that masters rarely combine, is as ignorant of the world as of the subject. Masters are always and every where in a sort of tacit, but constant and uniform combination, not to raise the wages of labour above their actual rate. To violate this combination is every where a most unpopular action, and a sort of reproach to a master among his neighbours and equals." (Wealth Of Nations - Book I, Chapter VIII)

Emphasis is mine.


What part of:


whose interests are by no means the same.
...didn't you understand? They're not your buddies, they're your masters. Are you into having "masters"?
As I busted my ass to form companies, no worker helped nor put a dime in. As I formed the company, I had to locate customers. I had to pay expenses to do that. I later learned the workers believed after being hired, they could be my master. But why?
 
I am nervous over a partisan billionaire deciding how our country should operate

The Golden Rule
He who has the Gold makes the rules
Ronald Reagan tackled this same problem. But he put together a committee. And all they could do is make recommendations. Workers fight any and all recommendations. It is the way they think.

Let's try this different. Say you own an apartment building. Sure it was your money buying it. Sure it was your money paying expenses to have it built. Suddenly after you hire some to mow lawns, they now want to unionize to be your master. Democrats think this makes sense.
 
Back
Top Bottom