Elizabeth Warren? Seriously?

[Uncensored2008]

So this is the caliber of Warren's opposition, is it?

She could run for Empress of the World and not even have to campaign.

Her victory will rival the victory you had in November.

The DNC brand is loved by all, and Obama's surrender to Cuba this morning just furthers that love.

You'll get 99% of the vote, no doubt at all...

 

[Pogo]

Sorry, I got here late, but I saw that ass hat O'Reilly last night reach new heights in irrational assessments, when he had a segment on Elizabeth Warren.

What I don't get...is why he needs to cover it. Fox News viewers aren't going to vote for a Democrat, so I'm puzzled.

Good news. It means they know she's a threat. Fox Noise is coming out front to try to keebosh Warren and brainwash their viewers now.

Brainwash? Excuse me, are you insinuating that Americans shouldn't have discussions about their potential candidates and that information about them shouldn't be discussed? Did you not discuss things about candidates yourself, oh maybe Sarah Palin, etc.? Funny how upset you on the left seem to get when discussing a legitimate issue regarding a candidate.

You haven't brought a "legitimate issue" to this thread yet. Oh thanks for the sigline.
Now why are you so obsessed with race anyway?

 

[Neil N. Blowme]

Sorry, I got here late, but I saw that ass hat O'Reilly last night reach new heights in irrational assessments, when he had a segment on Elizabeth Warren.

What I don't get...is why he needs to cover it. Fox News viewers aren't going to vote for a Democrat, so I'm puzzled.

Good news. It means they know she's a threat. Fox Noise is coming out front to try to keebosh Warren and brainwash their viewers now.

Brainwash? Excuse me, are you insinuating that Americans shouldn't have discussions about their potential candidates and that information about them shouldn't be discussed? Did you not discuss things about candidates yourself, oh maybe Sarah Palin, etc.? Funny how upset you on the left seem to get when discussing a legitimate issue regarding a candidate.

You haven't brought a "legitimate issue" to this thread yet. Oh thanks for the sigline.
Now why are you so obsessed with race anyway?

Why do you support Elizabeth Warren?

 

[Pogo]

She appears to be Caucasian.

Wow. While I was writing my post and talking about rubes and the "squaw", Blowme was posting and using "squaw" in his post!

You see? What a well trained and obedient mindless rube!

His user name speaks volumes.

Right Heywood?

Why did you quote me here? Who is Heywood.

I didn't quote you -- that's my new sigline. Don't know what it's doing up there. Perhaps it "filled out a form" and got moved up.

That post is about the poster Heywood, which refers to the junior high school name he chose for himself, a variant of "Heywood Jablowme". As noted, it figures.

This is your ally btw. Enjoy.

Also, you don't have my permission to use my quote, so I'm going to ask you politely to please remove it as your signature. Thank you in advance.

Oh no problem, you see I don't need it. You posted it on the board and now it's linked for posterior posterity. Besides, you don't have my permission to deny the facts sitting in your own post, so I guess we is even up.

 

[ChrisL]

Sorry, I got here late, but I saw that ass hat O'Reilly last night reach new heights in irrational assessments, when he had a segment on Elizabeth Warren.

What I don't get...is why he needs to cover it. Fox News viewers aren't going to vote for a Democrat, so I'm puzzled.

Good news. It means they know she's a threat. Fox Noise is coming out front to try to keebosh Warren and brainwash their viewers now.

Brainwash? Excuse me, are you insinuating that Americans shouldn't have discussions about their potential candidates and that information about them shouldn't be discussed? Did you not discuss things about candidates yourself, oh maybe Sarah Palin, etc.? Funny how upset you on the left seem to get when discussing a legitimate issue regarding a candidate.

You haven't brought a "legitimate issue" to this thread yet. Oh thanks for the sigline.
Now why are you so obsessed with race anyway?

How am I obsessed with race? By noting that Liz doesn't look like and most likely is NOT a native American?

Oh, and how very mature of you. Lol. Now, I'm going to ask again nicely for you to remove my quote as your sig line. If not, you are going to have to be the first person I report, because I'm pretty sure you can't do that without permission by the person you are quoting.

 

[ChrisL]

She appears to be Caucasian.

Wow. While I was writing my post and talking about rubes and the "squaw", Blowme was posting and using "squaw" in his post!

You see? What a well trained and obedient mindless rube!

His user name speaks volumes.

Right Heywood?

Why did you quote me here? Who is Heywood.

Also, you don't have my permission to use my quote, so I'm going to ask you politely to please remove it as your signature. Thank you in advance.

I didn't quote you -- that's my new sigline. Don't know what it's doing up there. Perhaps it "filled out a form" and got moved up.

That post is about the poster Heywood, which refers to the junior high school name he chose for himself, a variant of "Heywood Jablowme". As noted, it figures.

This is your ally btw. Enjoy.

Um, yeah, that doesn't explain why you quoted me in your post. Trying to get my attention maybe?

Anyway, how about you stop acting like a douche and remove my quote as your signature. You don't have my permission to use and you never even bothered to ask me. Obviously, you are just being mean-spirited because I don't like Elizabeth Warren. Oh well.

 

[BullKurtz]

Normally when a caucasian claims injun tribal ancestors, it's a cut of the casino gambling money they're after....

 

[ChrisL]

Sorry, I got here late, but I saw that ass hat O'Reilly last night reach new heights in irrational assessments, when he had a segment on Elizabeth Warren.

What I don't get...is why he needs to cover it. Fox News viewers aren't going to vote for a Democrat, so I'm puzzled.

Good news. It means they know she's a threat. Fox Noise is coming out front to try to keebosh Warren and brainwash their viewers now.

Brainwash? Excuse me, are you insinuating that Americans shouldn't have discussions about their potential candidates and that information about them shouldn't be discussed? Did you not discuss things about candidates yourself, oh maybe Sarah Palin, etc.? Funny how upset you on the left seem to get when discussing a legitimate issue regarding a candidate.

You haven't brought a "legitimate issue" to this thread yet. Oh thanks for the sigline.
Now why are you so obsessed with race anyway?

Why do you support Elizabeth Warren?

Very good question. Why Pogo do you support Elizabeth Warren?

 

[Pogo]

So this is the caliber of Warren's opposition, is it?

She could run for Empress of the World and not even have to campaign.

For sure. That's what you lefties really want.... An academic royal nanny to powder your butts and change your diapers

and ::::whooosh:::: right over Hayseed's head.

What that means is wags like you representing her opposition, running with bullshit myths we all know are myths, just makes whatever path she might take that much easier.

 

[BullKurtz]

3,248 hits!

 

[ChrisL]

She appears to be Caucasian.

Wow. While I was writing my post and talking about rubes and the "squaw", Blowme was posting and using "squaw" in his post!

You see? What a well trained and obedient mindless rube!

His user name speaks volumes.

Right Heywood?

Why did you quote me here? Who is Heywood.

I didn't quote you -- that's my new sigline. Don't know what it's doing up there. Perhaps it "filled out a form" and got moved up.

That post is about the poster Heywood, which refers to the junior high school name he chose for himself, a variant of "Heywood Jablowme". As noted, it figures.

This is your ally btw. Enjoy.

Also, you don't have my permission to use my quote, so I'm going to ask you politely to please remove it as your signature. Thank you in advance.

Oh no problem, you see I don't need it. You posted it on the board and now it's linked for posterior posterity. Besides, you don't have my permission to deny the facts sitting in your own post, so I guess we is even up.

I don't have allies. I come here to post my opinions. If I agree with a poster, I may like his or her post. Maybe you should grow up. How old are you again? Like 60 or 70 years old?

 

[Pogo]

So this is the caliber of Warren's opposition, is it?

She could run for Empress of the World and not even have to campaign.

Sorry that Elizabeth is a dishonest weasel. You are taking your anger and frustration out on the wrong people. It is Liz you should be upset with. She knew full well what she was doing, claiming native American status. Lol.

Again for the 635th time ---- the link to where she "claims" any kind of "status" is .... where?






Exactly.

 

[Neil N. Blowme]

So this is the caliber of Warren's opposition, is it?

She could run for Empress of the World and not even have to campaign.

Sorry that Elizabeth is a dishonest weasel. You are taking your anger and frustration out on the wrong people. It is Liz you should be upset with. She knew full well what she was doing, claiming native American status. Lol.

Again for the 635th time ---- the link to where she "claims" any kind of "status" is .... where?






Exactly.

Why do you support Elizabeth Warren?

 

[ChrisL]

So this is the caliber of Warren's opposition, is it?

She could run for Empress of the World and not even have to campaign.

Sorry that Elizabeth is a dishonest weasel. You are taking your anger and frustration out on the wrong people. It is Liz you should be upset with. She knew full well what she was doing, claiming native American status. Lol.

Again for the 635th time ---- the link to where she "claims" any kind of "status" is .... where?






Exactly.

Post #436.

 

[Pogo]

Sorry, I got here late, but I saw that ass hat O'Reilly last night reach new heights in irrational assessments, when he had a segment on Elizabeth Warren.

What I don't get...is why he needs to cover it. Fox News viewers aren't going to vote for a Democrat, so I'm puzzled.

Good news. It means they know she's a threat. Fox Noise is coming out front to try to keebosh Warren and brainwash their viewers now.

Brainwash? Excuse me, are you insinuating that Americans shouldn't have discussions about their potential candidates and that information about them shouldn't be discussed? Did you not discuss things about candidates yourself, oh maybe Sarah Palin, etc.? Funny how upset you on the left seem to get when discussing a legitimate issue regarding a candidate.

You haven't brought a "legitimate issue" to this thread yet. Oh thanks for the sigline.
Now why are you so obsessed with race anyway?

Why do you support Elizabeth Warren?

I haven't posted a damn thing about Elizabeth Warren politically. Neither her nor anywhere else. Go ahead and look it up. Not a one.

See, I don't need to. What I've done is called out bullshit biography myths that have no basis. I've called for those bases and got zippo, bupkis, nada, zero, ****-all.

Now what am I gonna do with all these crickets?

 

[toxicmedia]

Sorry, I got here late, but I saw that ass hat O'Reilly last night reach new heights in irrational assessments, when he had a segment on Elizabeth Warren.

What I don't get...is why he needs to cover it. Fox News viewers aren't going to vote for a Democrat, so I'm puzzled.

Good news. It means they know she's a threat. Fox Noise is coming out front to try to keebosh Warren and brainwash their viewers now.

Why do you support the squaw?

Who said I support her? I don't

 

[ChrisL]

So this is the caliber of Warren's opposition, is it?

She could run for Empress of the World and not even have to campaign.

Sorry that Elizabeth is a dishonest weasel. You are taking your anger and frustration out on the wrong people. It is Liz you should be upset with. She knew full well what she was doing, claiming native American status. Lol.

Again for the 635th time ---- the link to where she "claims" any kind of "status" is .... where?






Exactly.

BTW, it was not 635 times. How old are you anyway? Aren't you an old man? I'm surprised that an old man would act in such a manner, especially towards a female for simply voicing her opinions because he doesn't like it. What kind of rude old man are you anyway?

 

[ChrisL]

Sorry, I got here late, but I saw that ass hat O'Reilly last night reach new heights in irrational assessments, when he had a segment on Elizabeth Warren.

What I don't get...is why he needs to cover it. Fox News viewers aren't going to vote for a Democrat, so I'm puzzled.

Good news. It means they know she's a threat. Fox Noise is coming out front to try to keebosh Warren and brainwash their viewers now.

Brainwash? Excuse me, are you insinuating that Americans shouldn't have discussions about their potential candidates and that information about them shouldn't be discussed? Did you not discuss things about candidates yourself, oh maybe Sarah Palin, etc.? Funny how upset you on the left seem to get when discussing a legitimate issue regarding a candidate.

You haven't brought a "legitimate issue" to this thread yet. Oh thanks for the sigline.
Now why are you so obsessed with race anyway?

Why do you support Elizabeth Warren?

I haven't posted a damn thing about Elizabeth Warren politically. Neither her nor anywhere else. Go ahead and look it up. I don't need to.

What I've done is called out bullshit myths that have no basis. I've called for those bases and got zippo, bupkis, nada, zero, ****-all.

Now what am I gonna do with all these crickets?

What is WRONG with you? Did you forget to take your meds today? Is your cat stuck in a tree again?

 

[rightwinger]

Looting?

Our richest taxpayers have the lowest effective tax rate in history
That is why they fear Elizabeth Warren. She stirs up the masses

What's the tax rate for the bottom 40% of earners?
Oh, yeah.

What should it be on the portion of the population that has 4 tenths of a percent of our nations wealth?

The same rate as everyone else pays. Whatever happened to the liberal idea that everyone should "have some skin in the game?"

Why do you desire to loot money from that part of the population that only has 2 tenths of percent of our national wealth?

Why not go after those with 34.6% of the wealth?

You prove your stupidity by not recognizing the difference between wealth and income.
But anywya, what do you think is a fair rate of taxation for the bottom 40% of wage earners?

I absolutely understand the difference between wealth and income. We can't touch existing wealth and don't really want to

But the question remains ....why do we continue economic programs whose only purpose is to ensure future wealth goes to the one percent?

That is why we need to increase the upper tax rate to the mid 40s, equalize capital gains and eliminate the vast number of tax exemptions

 

[rightwinger]

^ LOL!

Based on reactions like this, I
^
So is that the message Fox News is painting for you?

You do understand Indians are the very least bitter about their oppression compared to other major oppressed classes.......

Indian oppression is basically gone, as you have acknowledged. Yet you think she stated this to get leverage.....

News flash! She isn't really even 1/32 Cherokee. None of grammy's stories could be confirmed.

Actually it was already linked earlier. But you go on and continue to bravely run away since you can't back anything up.

​

Nobody has to prove anything. She claimed that she was a native American in order to get some perks. Come to find out, she's just another lying POS who will lie and say anything for her own benefit.

Liz Warren never received any "perks" from relaying that she was part native American

Bullshit.
She got preferential hiring at Harvard because of it. That was the whole issue.

That is what Rush Limbaugh said, not what Harvard said