Election interference serious question.

[The Original Tree]

Are Americans and the MSM on the same page? Do Americans trust Russia more than Google? Let's find out.

Got news for ya kid:

Google is an American company owned by Americans and employing Americans. When Americans get involved in an American election that's called "participation", not "interference".

They are in the business of censorship and should be treated like a public utility because it is obvious companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter cannot police themselves.

There is no law which says that those companies can't run their companies as they wish, do you want the insurance industry to change so we do not have to carry the burden for the richest companies in the US?

There are laws governing the insurance industry. Laws that prevent Discrimination and Bigotry based on Race, Sex or Beliefs Political or Religious.

 

[Crepitus]

Got news for ya kid:
Google is an American company owned by Americans and employing Americans. When Americans get involved in an American election that's called "participation", not "interference".

You get more and more stupid every day CRAPitus. Did your mom smoke crack?

Being involved, and interfering by manipulating search engines and information is two different things you half-witted imbecile.

How so? Just use another search engine.

Now wipe your chin.

 

[iceberg]

Are Americans and the MSM on the same page? Do Americans trust Russia more than Google? Let's find out.

Got news for ya kid:

Google is an American company owned by Americans and employing Americans. When Americans get involved in an American election that's called "participation", not "interference".

They are in the business of censorship and should be treated like a public utility because it is obvious companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter cannot police themselves.

There is no law which says that those companies can't run their companies as they wish, do you want the insurance industry to change so we do not have to carry the burden for the richest companies in the US?

the problem is these companies are not defined as "one or the other" - they're taking the best of both worlds in their business model and they need to pick who they are and go with it. this "we are xyz today, 123 tomorrow - depends on who is asking and why" - that needs to end.

 

[Crepitus]

Are Americans and the MSM on the same page? Do Americans trust Russia more than Google? Let's find out.

Got news for ya kid:

Google is an American company owned by Americans and employing Americans. When Americans get involved in an American election that's called "participation", not "interference".

They are in the business of censorship and should be treated like a public utility because it is obvious companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter cannot police themselves.

There is no law which says that those companies can't run their companies as they wish, do you want the insurance industry to change so we do not have to carry the burden for the richest companies in the US?

the problem is these companies are not defined as "one or the other" - they're taking the best of both worlds in their business model and they need to pick who they are and go with it. this "we are xyz today, 123 tomorrow - depends on who is asking and why" - that needs to end.

When have any of these companies claimed to be other than a private business?

 

[Moonglow]

Are Americans and the MSM on the same page? Do Americans trust Russia more than Google? Let's find out.

Got news for ya kid:

Google is an American company owned by Americans and employing Americans. When Americans get involved in an American election that's called "participation", not "interference".

They are in the business of censorship and should be treated like a public utility because it is obvious companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter cannot police themselves.

There is no law which says that those companies can't run their companies as they wish, do you want the insurance industry to change so we do not have to carry the burden for the richest companies in the US?

There are laws governing the insurance industry. Laws that prevent Discrimination and Bigotry based on Race, Sex or Beliefs Political or Religious.

Yet that has nothing to do with the rules they establish for use of their websites.
Just like USMB they have rules you break them you get punished-duh..

 

[Street Juice]

Are Americans and the MSM on the same page? Do Americans trust Russia more than Google? Let's find out.

Got news for ya kid:

Google is an American company owned by Americans and employing Americans. When Americans get involved in an American election that's called "participation", not "interference".

Oops... "Google is an American globalist company owned by Americans 'world citizens' and employing Americans 'H1-B cheap Indian labor units. When Americans dual citizen billionaires get involved in an American orchestrated election that's called 'participation' tyranny of the rich, not 'interference' the America I was taught to love and respect that I could trust existed for the benefit of its citizens, not billionaires."

 

[Crepitus]

Are Americans and the MSM on the same page? Do Americans trust Russia more than Google? Let's find out.

Got news for ya kid:

Google is an American company owned by Americans and employing Americans. When Americans get involved in an American election that's called "participation", not "interference".

Oops... "Google is an American globalist company owned by Americans 'world citizens' and employing Americans 'H1-B cheap Indian labor units. When Americans dual citizen billionaires get involved in an American orchestrated election that's called 'participation' tyranny of the rich, not 'interference' the America I was taught to love and respect that I could trust existed for the benefit of its citizens, not billionaires."

No "oops". You don't get to say that just because you made up some shit.

 

[HenryBHough]

Each election tampering effort made by Google needs to be treated as an in-kind political contribution.

Once it hits the legal limit then Google must be forced to choose between knocking it off or being shut down and their executives prosecuted.

But up to that legal limit let'em do as they want.