A few years back I was really confused me when UN employees/officials were being identified as international civil servants. Those people serving their homelands at the UN are civil servants for the country they represent. They cannot be defined as international civil servants.
Why is it important to prick this particular balloon? International law and international civil servant are global government inventions; neither one exists. Look at how non-existent “international law” is slowly gaining acceptance and you’ll begin to see the danger. International civil servants are being put on the same road to acceptance as is international law. Neither exists, yet the repeated, unchallenged, use of the term “international law” gave most Americans a vague notion that it is real.
UN treaties, along with the UN’s phoney judiciary headquartered in The Hague, are the foundation for forcing international law on every sovereign nation. Treaties like the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, that the US Senate never ratified, will become law after a global government is established by the UNIC (United Nations/International Community) whether or not Americans want any part of it.
Notice that 32 years after the UNFCCC was born scum like John Kerry and Taqiyya the Liar are still claiming that manmade global warming is the number one threat to mankind.
Phrases utilizing the word international are employed to prepare Americans for the loss of their independence. The mainstream media and Hollywood are the biggest culprits in promoting international law. One problem is that listeners always hear the adjective and never the noun:
NOTE: The League of Nations was succeeded by the United Nations. Both qualify as Socialist organizations in that 19th century Socialism provided the philosophical foundation for totalitarian government. Now don’t jump to conclusions here. The UN is still an organization; so there might be a government lurking in the shadows the rest of us are unaware of. I would like to know which government that is.
Print journalists and talking heads are well aware that international law is newspeak for Socialist law. It’s probably too late to undo the decades of propaganda spent on legitimizing “international law,” but there is still a chance to shoot down “international civil servant” every time it pops up.
The term international civil servant first caught my attention in 2003. That sent me to my dictionaries. This is what I found in my computer dictionary:
This is what I found in my dependable one hundred dollar Random House Unabridged Dictionary:
No matter which dictionary you check, a civil servant has to work for a government to be defined as a civil servant. Did someone establish an international government and hire civil servants while I wasn’t watching? And where were the competitive exams given? And what is the abbreviation for the term “international civil service?” Logically it should be ICS, but that can easily be reworked by skeptics to mean International Communists Socialists.
Colin Powell was my next encounter with international civil servant. He also referred to UN sharpshooters as international civil servants. Because Powell used the phrase, I considered the possibility that a person could be working at the UN while being a civil servant for a specific country. Happily, the phrase made no sense for obvious reasons.
Let's use the United States as an example and say our international civil servant is a man. The question then becomes: Which entity is that international civil servant loyal to? Some might say he is loyal to both the UN and the US, but then I ran into the matter of divided loyalties; serving two masters, and that kind of stuff. Would you trust an employee who espouses loyalty to a competitor? As a matter of fact, quite a few American internationalists who support the UN do not say things that encourage trust in their loyalty to America.
And if the man in my example is paid by the American government, he can't really be an international civil servant no matter what his UN duties entail. He is an American civil servant paid by American tax dollars. That is not to say that every “American” assigned to the United Nations is a loyal American. I certainly had my doubts about Suzy Five Shows. (Samantha Power makes Suzy look like Molly Pitcher.) I’m simply pointing out that if my example is paid by the UN or one of its agencies he is working for an organization and cannot be defined as a civil servant —— international or otherwise.
What if the UN administered civil service exams? I suppose that would be okay so long as Exxon, General Motors, or the Boy Scouts of America gave exams and was allowed to call the people they hired civil servants.
There’s a lot about the UN that has been in the shadows for too long. Things like diplomatic immunity, UN ships that fly no national flag, and an organization with its own phoney judiciary funded by taxpayers. The UN even has its own postage stamps. Do you know of any organization in the world that gets away with even one of the things I listed?
Ebola civil servants
I think everyone knows what a farce the FDA is as it now operates in the area of drug licensing. I want to go back forty-odd years for youngsters who do not know about thalidomide by comparing the bums over at the CDC to Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey.
In the early sixties Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey was an FDA inspector who kept thalidomide from being approved for sale in America. Thalidomide had caused thousands of pregnant women in Europe and Africa to give birth to children born with the most tragic birth defects imaginable. Well-knowing the harm that was being done, the executives running the drug company still tried to have thalidomide approved for sale in this country.
The thalidomide tragedy was avoided because of one dedicated civil servant —— yet elected officials keep the number of LEGITIMATE, NECESSARY, civil servants low so they can increase the number of worthless garbage who will do as they are told. I’ve not seen one of Taqiyya’s the Liar’s Ebola mouthpieces who deserves the title of civil servant à la Frances Oldham Kelsey. Indeed, today all of the responsible civil servants in the federal government could not stop anything the scum in the White House wants.
NOTE: In the late sixties Thalidomide was approved for very limited use, but not for use by pregnant women, or by women who intend to have children.
Today, so many of our elected officials and bureaucrats have their hands out for payoffs from the same type of people who were behind marketing and selling thalidomide. Worse still, concerned FDA inspectors have been so neutered since thalidomide every honest FDA inspector acting in unison cannot stop “legal” drugs that kill and maim. God only knows the kinds of drugs that will be approved for use on Ebola patients. Unlike thalidomide —— Wall Street, the pharmaceutical companies, the media, and the government itself will see to it that improperly tested Ebola drugs will be used on Americans.
Bringing diseases into this country is about money. Remember that the lying sack of shit saw himself as a super-salesman who was going to sell socialized medicine to the public:
Well, the piece of garbage did not sell the ACA to Americans before or after he signed it into law. Congressional Democrats shoved it down the country’s throat. Now, the filthy sneak is making another run at selling something else the public opposes —— EBOLA in America. Whenever he talks about the disease he is bringing into this country he musters all of the moral sincerity he can dredge up and still the public says no.
Finally, the insurance industry and Wall Street got fat on the ACA. They will get a lot fatter if it is not repealed. Money is already pouring into Ebola; so if you want to get a handle on Ebola money check out the latest maggot to join Taqiyya’s Ebola team:
Bottom line: There is a vast difference between legitimate civil servants and hustlers who do what they do for money and nothing else.
Why is it important to prick this particular balloon? International law and international civil servant are global government inventions; neither one exists. Look at how non-existent “international law” is slowly gaining acceptance and you’ll begin to see the danger. International civil servants are being put on the same road to acceptance as is international law. Neither exists, yet the repeated, unchallenged, use of the term “international law” gave most Americans a vague notion that it is real.
UN treaties, along with the UN’s phoney judiciary headquartered in The Hague, are the foundation for forcing international law on every sovereign nation. Treaties like the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, that the US Senate never ratified, will become law after a global government is established by the UNIC (United Nations/International Community) whether or not Americans want any part of it.
Notice that 32 years after the UNFCCC was born scum like John Kerry and Taqiyya the Liar are still claiming that manmade global warming is the number one threat to mankind.
Phrases utilizing the word international are employed to prepare Americans for the loss of their independence. The mainstream media and Hollywood are the biggest culprits in promoting international law. One problem is that listeners always hear the adjective and never the noun:
international (adjective)
Abbr. int., intl.
1. Of, relating to, or involving two or more nations: an international commission; international affairs.
2. Extending across or transcending national boundaries: international fame.
International (noun)
Any of several socialist organizations of international scope formed during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Abbr. int., intl.
1. Of, relating to, or involving two or more nations: an international commission; international affairs.
2. Extending across or transcending national boundaries: international fame.
International (noun)
Any of several socialist organizations of international scope formed during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
NOTE: The League of Nations was succeeded by the United Nations. Both qualify as Socialist organizations in that 19th century Socialism provided the philosophical foundation for totalitarian government. Now don’t jump to conclusions here. The UN is still an organization; so there might be a government lurking in the shadows the rest of us are unaware of. I would like to know which government that is.
Print journalists and talking heads are well aware that international law is newspeak for Socialist law. It’s probably too late to undo the decades of propaganda spent on legitimizing “international law,” but there is still a chance to shoot down “international civil servant” every time it pops up.
The term international civil servant first caught my attention in 2003. That sent me to my dictionaries. This is what I found in my computer dictionary:
civil servant (noun)
A person employed in the civil service.
civil service (noun)
Abbr. CS
1. Those branches of public service that are not legislative, judicial, or military and in which employment is usually based on competitive examination.
2. The entire body of persons employed by the civil branches of a government.
A person employed in the civil service.
civil service (noun)
Abbr. CS
1. Those branches of public service that are not legislative, judicial, or military and in which employment is usually based on competitive examination.
2. The entire body of persons employed by the civil branches of a government.
This is what I found in my dependable one hundred dollar Random House Unabridged Dictionary:
civil servant,
a civil-service employee. [1790-1800]
civil service,
1. those branches of public service concerned with all government functions outside the armed services.
2. the body of persons employed in these branches.
3. a system or method of appointing government employees on the basis of competitive examinations, rather than by political patronage. [1775-85]
a civil-service employee. [1790-1800]
civil service,
1. those branches of public service concerned with all government functions outside the armed services.
2. the body of persons employed in these branches.
3. a system or method of appointing government employees on the basis of competitive examinations, rather than by political patronage. [1775-85]
No matter which dictionary you check, a civil servant has to work for a government to be defined as a civil servant. Did someone establish an international government and hire civil servants while I wasn’t watching? And where were the competitive exams given? And what is the abbreviation for the term “international civil service?” Logically it should be ICS, but that can easily be reworked by skeptics to mean International Communists Socialists.
Colin Powell was my next encounter with international civil servant. He also referred to UN sharpshooters as international civil servants. Because Powell used the phrase, I considered the possibility that a person could be working at the UN while being a civil servant for a specific country. Happily, the phrase made no sense for obvious reasons.
Let's use the United States as an example and say our international civil servant is a man. The question then becomes: Which entity is that international civil servant loyal to? Some might say he is loyal to both the UN and the US, but then I ran into the matter of divided loyalties; serving two masters, and that kind of stuff. Would you trust an employee who espouses loyalty to a competitor? As a matter of fact, quite a few American internationalists who support the UN do not say things that encourage trust in their loyalty to America.
And if the man in my example is paid by the American government, he can't really be an international civil servant no matter what his UN duties entail. He is an American civil servant paid by American tax dollars. That is not to say that every “American” assigned to the United Nations is a loyal American. I certainly had my doubts about Suzy Five Shows. (Samantha Power makes Suzy look like Molly Pitcher.) I’m simply pointing out that if my example is paid by the UN or one of its agencies he is working for an organization and cannot be defined as a civil servant —— international or otherwise.
What if the UN administered civil service exams? I suppose that would be okay so long as Exxon, General Motors, or the Boy Scouts of America gave exams and was allowed to call the people they hired civil servants.
There’s a lot about the UN that has been in the shadows for too long. Things like diplomatic immunity, UN ships that fly no national flag, and an organization with its own phoney judiciary funded by taxpayers. The UN even has its own postage stamps. Do you know of any organization in the world that gets away with even one of the things I listed?
Ebola civil servants
I think everyone knows what a farce the FDA is as it now operates in the area of drug licensing. I want to go back forty-odd years for youngsters who do not know about thalidomide by comparing the bums over at the CDC to Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey.
In the early sixties Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey was an FDA inspector who kept thalidomide from being approved for sale in America. Thalidomide had caused thousands of pregnant women in Europe and Africa to give birth to children born with the most tragic birth defects imaginable. Well-knowing the harm that was being done, the executives running the drug company still tried to have thalidomide approved for sale in this country.
The thalidomide tragedy was avoided because of one dedicated civil servant —— yet elected officials keep the number of LEGITIMATE, NECESSARY, civil servants low so they can increase the number of worthless garbage who will do as they are told. I’ve not seen one of Taqiyya’s the Liar’s Ebola mouthpieces who deserves the title of civil servant à la Frances Oldham Kelsey. Indeed, today all of the responsible civil servants in the federal government could not stop anything the scum in the White House wants.
NOTE: In the late sixties Thalidomide was approved for very limited use, but not for use by pregnant women, or by women who intend to have children.
Today, so many of our elected officials and bureaucrats have their hands out for payoffs from the same type of people who were behind marketing and selling thalidomide. Worse still, concerned FDA inspectors have been so neutered since thalidomide every honest FDA inspector acting in unison cannot stop “legal” drugs that kill and maim. God only knows the kinds of drugs that will be approved for use on Ebola patients. Unlike thalidomide —— Wall Street, the pharmaceutical companies, the media, and the government itself will see to it that improperly tested Ebola drugs will be used on Americans.
Bringing diseases into this country is about money. Remember that the lying sack of shit saw himself as a super-salesman who was going to sell socialized medicine to the public:
Berry recounted meetings with White House officials, reminiscent of some during the Clinton days, where he and others urged them not to force Blue Dogs “off into that swamp” of supporting bills that would be unpopular with voters back home.
“I’ve been doing that with this White House, and they just don’t seem to give it any credibility at all,” Berry said. “They just kept telling us how good it was going to be. The president himself, when that was brought up in one group, said, ‘Well, the big difference here and in ’94 was you’ve got me.’ We’re going to see how much difference that makes now.”
“I’ve been doing that with this White House, and they just don’t seem to give it any credibility at all,” Berry said. “They just kept telling us how good it was going to be. The president himself, when that was brought up in one group, said, ‘Well, the big difference here and in ’94 was you’ve got me.’ We’re going to see how much difference that makes now.”
January 25, 2010
Berry: Obama said "big difference" between '10 and '94 is "me"
Berry Obama said big difference between 10 and 94 is me - On Congress - POLITICO.com
Berry: Obama said "big difference" between '10 and '94 is "me"
Berry Obama said big difference between 10 and 94 is me - On Congress - POLITICO.com
Well, the piece of garbage did not sell the ACA to Americans before or after he signed it into law. Congressional Democrats shoved it down the country’s throat. Now, the filthy sneak is making another run at selling something else the public opposes —— EBOLA in America. Whenever he talks about the disease he is bringing into this country he musters all of the moral sincerity he can dredge up and still the public says no.
Finally, the insurance industry and Wall Street got fat on the ACA. They will get a lot fatter if it is not repealed. Money is already pouring into Ebola; so if you want to get a handle on Ebola money check out the latest maggot to join Taqiyya’s Ebola team:
Klain was also a central player in the president’s Solyndra fraud, which soaked taxpayers for over half a billion dollars for the benefit of Obama cronies.
Solyndra is so many Obama scandals ago that its unseemly details are tough to recall. The story is thus worth retelling. As our nerves fray over the Ebola crisis, it is a valuable window into the administration’s priorities and an indicator of the level of trust we can put in the new czar’s assurances.
Well, well, well. Here we are just two weeks before the 2014 midterms and Ron Klain is back to manage another crisis — an infectious-disease outbreak. Sure he’s a political fixer, not an epidemiologist, but rest assured that Klain will keep us promptly apprised of all Ebola developments without ever glancing at a calendar or a poll.
XXXXX
Solyndra is so many Obama scandals ago that its unseemly details are tough to recall. The story is thus worth retelling. As our nerves fray over the Ebola crisis, it is a valuable window into the administration’s priorities and an indicator of the level of trust we can put in the new czar’s assurances.
XXXXX
Well, well, well. Here we are just two weeks before the 2014 midterms and Ron Klain is back to manage another crisis — an infectious-disease outbreak. Sure he’s a political fixer, not an epidemiologist, but rest assured that Klain will keep us promptly apprised of all Ebola developments without ever glancing at a calendar or a poll.
Ron Klain and Solyndra
The administration’s point man on a solar fraud is now in charge of Ebola.
By Andrew C. McCarthy
Ron Klain and Solyndra National Review Online
The administration’s point man on a solar fraud is now in charge of Ebola.
By Andrew C. McCarthy
Ron Klain and Solyndra National Review Online
Bottom line: There is a vast difference between legitimate civil servants and hustlers who do what they do for money and nothing else.
