Mamooth writes:
"But we have watched it. That's why we know with certainty that it's crap."
I didn't realize you have a split personality, no wonder you have a hard time writing up a coherent argument on anything.
He also writes this baloney since most of the movie are based on actual visits to the places under discussion in real time:
"Let's hit the main point that you keep running from. The film is based on wildly outdated information, making all of its claims just wrong."
It is clear that you are a sucker because by NOT watching the Documentary, you are easy to snooker, due to your complete ignorance of what the film talks about.
I have read some of the criticism, yes a there are some old stuff out there, but that is obvious since they are right there filming it, the problem YOU have is that you don't try to know the whole story, which requires effort. That is why you easily mislead by the critics who are vague in their replies.
I posted a link (post 48) to an article that discussed some of the criticism, which YOU avoided reading, which is why you are beaing fooled easily:
"While they were wrong about their claimed success, the “green” left has indeed tried to suppress Moore’s documentary. They say it is full of lies and misinformation, but are slow to cite any instances. Mostly it is generalities like this:
The film states that renewable energy such as solar and wind are inefficient, useless and dependent on fossil fuels to work. Quote from the film “One of the most dangerous things right now is the illusion that alternative technologies, like wind and solar, are somehow different from fossil fuels…You would have been better off just burning the fossil fuels in the first place, instead of playing pretend.”
This assertion, which is echoed over and over in the film, is patently untrue and ridiculous. The notion that solar and wind and other renewable technologies don’t work to produce energy in ways that are cheaper, more efficient and at low or zero carbon emissions over their life span flies in the face of everything engineers, scientists and energy planners have been writing in peer reviewed science for decades.
So there! Have you noticed how dependent leftists and liberals are on arguments from authority these days? In their eyes, questioning alleged “authority” is a cardinal sin. Their fascist tendencies are shining through."
===
You also ignored this from post 44:
"Director-narrator Jeff Gibbs
never talks to coal, oil or natural gas advocates – or to “renewable” energy and “manmade climate crisis” skeptics.
Instead, he interviews fellow environmentalists who are justifiably aghast at what wind, solar and biofuel projects are doing to scenic areas, wildlife habitats, rare and endangered species, and millions of acres of forests, deserts and grasslands."
and,
After speaking with “renewable” advocates in Lansing, Michigan, and learning that the Chevy Volt they’re so excited about is actually recharged by a coal-fired generating plant, Gibbs visits a nearby football-field-sized solar farm. It can power 50 (!) homes at peak solar intensity. Powering all of Lansing (not including the Michigan State University campus) would require
15 square miles of panels – plus wind turbines and a huge array of batteries (or a coal or gas power plant) for nights and cloudy days.
The crew films one of those turbines being erected outside of town. Each one is comprised of nearly 5,000,000 pounds of concrete, steel, aluminum, copper, plastic, cobalt, rare earths, fiberglass and other materials. Every step in the mining, processing, manufacturing, transportation, installation, maintenance and (20 years later) removal process requires fossil fuels.
and more in the link for rational, decent people who thirst for knowledge:"
=====
Keep it is up Mamooth, your deliberate ignorance is very entertaining.
ketanjoshi.co
