Early Voting Indicates a Decisive Harris Win

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
73,499
Reaction score
42,101
Points
2,645
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
In an unusual turnout, Republicans have been dominating in early voting this year, but it may not be what it seems. Exit polling of those who have voted early shows Harris with a lopsided lead over Trump. Additionally, turnout among women is roughly ten percentage points higher than men. This would indicate that many of those early Republican voters are women who are crossing over for Harris. MAGA seems to realize this as well because they've been sounding the alarm on social media.

 
In an unusual turnout, Republicans have been dominating in early voting this year, but it may not be what it seems. Exit polling of those who have voted early shows Harris with a lopsided lead over Trump. Additionally, turnout among women is roughly ten percentage points higher than men. This would indicate that many of those early Republican voters are women who are crossing over for Harris. MAGA seems to realize this as well because they've been sounding the alarm on social media.




Nothing like exit poll bullshit to try to discourage a voter base.
 
In an unusual turnout, Republicans have been dominating in early voting this year, but it may not be what it seems. Exit polling of those who have voted early shows Harris with a lopsided lead over Trump. Additionally, turnout among women is roughly ten percentage points higher than men. This would indicate that many of those early Republican voters are women who are crossing over for Harris. MAGA seems to realize this as well because they've been sounding the alarm on social media.


Good luck with that.
 
how many chickens?

1730472108011.webp
 
There is no way that Trump's message has not been heard by every voter in America.

There is no way a majority of Americans are signing up for 4 more years of it.
is this your election security?
 

Early Voting Indicates a Decisive Harris Win​

I don't see that it indicates that at all. All it is is some specious polling source posting unverified numbers of people they count by gender. The problem is:
  1. It doesn't include mail-ins.
  2. It doesn't account for women being more free to vote early while more men are working so hold off until election day.
  3. It assumes that every woman voting goes toward Harris, it does not.
  4. It doesn't account for the fact that democrats don't know what a woman is, so likely made a lot of mistakes.

In an unusual turnout, Republicans have been dominating in early voting this year, but it may not be what it seems. Exit polling of those who have voted early shows Harris with a lopsided lead over Trump.
Non sequitur: how can republicans be DOMINATING in voting, yet Harris have a lopsided lead?

Additionally, turnout among women is roughly ten percentage points higher than men. This would indicate that many of those early Republican voters are women who are crossing over for Harris.
Pure baseless bloviation.
 
I don't see that it indicates that at all. All it is is some specious polling source posting unverified numbers of people they count by gender. The problem is:
  1. It doesn't include mail-ins.
It does because it's based on exit polling

  1. It doesn't account for women being more free to vote early while more men are working so hold off until election day.
That may or may not be true

  1. It assumes that every woman voting goes toward Harris, it does not.
Nobody implied any such thing

  1. It doesn't account for the fact that democrats don't know what a woman is, so likely made a lot of mistakes.

So you have no real argument.

Non sequitur: how can republicans be DOMINATING in voting, yet Harris have a lopsided lead?

That explanation, which is far more grounded in reality than any of your ridiculousness, was already explained and the entire premise of the thread.

So, you've pretty much added nothing.
 
It does because it's based on exit polling
It CLAIMS to be based on exit polling.

That may or may not be true
Another uncertainty and variable yet your OP draws HARD conclusions as if it WERE certain.

Nobody implied any such thing
That is exactly what both you and the X poster implied.

So you have no real argument.
Just the one that this polling proves nothing only suggests that up to now, more women have voted early than men.

That explanation, which is far more grounded in reality than any of your ridiculousness,
I'm never ridiculous except when obviously kidding around.

was already explained and the entire premise of the thread.
Explained only by a groundless assumption that a lot of former Trump republicans are jumping ship to vote for Harris when NOTHING else in any of the election, rallies or studies support that.

So, you've pretty much added nothing.
Just that you can't draw any hard conclusions from a tiny bit of soft data.
 
I don't see that it indicates that at all. All it is is some specious polling source posting unverified numbers of people they count by gender.
Dems pull this polling lie shit every election to try to suppress Republican voter turnout. The propaganda is why go vote, it's already over the Dem won. Freaking Dems are the lowest form of sub-human filth.
 
Having dug into the details of dozens of these suspicious Dem polls I'll assume this one way oversampled Democrats like the rest of them. :icon_rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom