Early likely scenarios for the election:

The Harris pathetic October jobs report of just 12k new jobs should sink her campaign. That's just 10% of the jobs forecast. Clearly the Harris economy is absolute shit.
 
Given the RCP numbers, it looks like Trump could very well take NC, AZ, NV, and GA.

Assume he does for a second…it becomes all about the 3 ā€œblue wallā€ states. MI, WI, and PA. Before they are counted, the tally would be Trump 268 Harris 226

If Harris gets all 3, I think she’d get the presidency 270-268. (10+15+19)

So Trump would just have to take 1 of the 3.

Anything can happen, but that could end up being the scenario. And boy, with the shadiness we’ve seen in Michigan and PA… it could get ugly again.
Both really need to win Pennsylvania.
 
Good job! That second paragraph had no childish commentary and insults. You can do it if you try!

It seems we agree what the scenario can likely be
Yeah....I even started a thread about it like 10 days ago. Glad you finally mastered the obvious. I knew you could do it if you tried.
 
Given the RCP numbers, it looks like Trump could very well take NC, AZ, NV, and GA.

Assume he does for a second…it becomes all about the 3 ā€œblue wallā€ states. MI, WI, and PA. Before they are counted, the tally would be Trump 268 Harris 226

If Harris gets all 3, I think she’d get the presidency 270-268. (10+15+19)

So Trump would just have to take 1 of the 3.

Anything can happen, but that could end up being the scenario. And boy, with the shadiness we’ve seen in Michigan and PA… it could get ugly again.

My husband and I agree on a lot but we disagree on this: he thinks cheating to win is a very big possibility again. I do not.

Too many eyes on the game this time. Too many Trump voters, too many lawsuits, too many lawyers. Too much at stake.

Could Trump lose all three: MI, WI, and PA? Sure. But if they cheat to do it, and we can prove it, the Democrats are done just as sure as if they had lost all three to Trump.
 
I love the idea that enough Jews in PA were disgusted by her ā€œno Jews on the ticketā€ policy that they abandon her and hand the state - and the election - to Trump.

Poetic Justice.

It could very well be there's a lot we're not seeing in the polling. A lot of people who will stay home and just don't answer polls, or are not polled. I don't think previous Dem coalitions are motivated by Harris--particularly minority men.

We'll see
 
Philadelphia always waits to turn in their ballot count until after the rest of the state turns in their counts, because they have to know how many ballots that they need to fabricate.

View attachment 1034834
I remember that lady from Broward county FL. We need to be sure the fraudsters are all gone.
 
My husband and I agree on a lot but we disagree on this: he thinks cheating to win is a very big possibility again. I do not.

Too many eyes on the game this time. Too many Trump voters, too many lawsuits, too many lawyers. Too much at stake.

Could Trump lose all three: MI, WI, and PA? Sure. But if they cheat to do it, and we can prove it, the Democrats are done just as sure as if they had lost all three to Trump.
Agree. Three things different this time:

1) The very willingness of judges to take these pre-election cases - including the SCOTUS in VA - shows that courts will be willing to hear evidence in formal court trials this time. And the cheating Dems know it.

2) Also, Lara Trump has done a phenomenal job in getting 100,000+ observers in place to watch as the Dems attempt to count as. Harris votes questionable ballots without matching signatures or fold lines, or ones that are unclear as to who was intended.

3) There will be no midnight halts, in swing states where Trump is ahead, to give counters a break, repair a leaking toilet, or whatever.
 
The Harris pathetic October jobs report of just 12k new jobs should sink her campaign. That's just 10% of the jobs forecast. Clearly the Harris economy is absolute shit.
Was it Pence's job report when Trump was president? Of course not.
 
Philadelphia always waits to turn in their ballot count until after the rest of the state turns in their counts, because they have to know how many ballots that they need to fabricate.

View attachment 1034834
Fairfax County in liberal NoVa tried that in the Youngkin governor race: rural counties had 90% of their votes reported by 8 pm, and Fairfax didn’t report A SINGLE VOTE. Why? They claimed the machine that counted the votes was broken.

Stalling is the same thing as halting the count.
 
My husband and I agree on a lot but we disagree on this: he thinks cheating to win is a very big possibility again. I do not.

Too many eyes on the game this time. Too many Trump voters, too many lawsuits, too many lawyers. Too much at stake.

Could Trump lose all three: MI, WI, and PA? Sure. But if they cheat to do it, and we can prove it, the Democrats are done just as sure as if they had lost all three to Trump.
Possibly, but you have to remember that while many alarms can be sounded, and videos and evidence shown, if judges throw it out for whatever reason, it’s ignored. And we’ve seen massive judicial activism is this election already.

I think leftist judges would gladly throw cases out that might harm Harris chances of winning, and just say they ā€œdon’t have standingā€ā€¦ without any actual reason for ignoring it all.
 
My husband and I agree on a lot but we disagree on this: he thinks cheating to win is a very big possibility again. I do not.
Too many eyes on the game this time. Too many Trump voters, too many lawsuits, too many lawyers. Too much at stake.
Could Trump lose all three: MI, WI, and PA? Sure. But if they cheat to do it, and we can prove it, the Democrats are done just as sure as if they had lost all three to Trump.
You are overlooking the obvious. France prohibits mail-in voting because it is too easy to cheat and too hard to detect.
Proving cheating in days is impossible, it takes time to investigate, so the democrats always get away with cheating.
 
Possibly, but you have to remember that while many alarms can be sounded, and videos and evidence shown, if judges throw it out for whatever reason, it’s ignored. And we’ve seen massive judicial activism is this election already.

I think leftist judges would gladly throw cases out that might harm Harris chances of winning, and just say they ā€œdon’t have standingā€ā€¦ without any actual reason for ignoring it all.
But it would be appealed to the SCOTUS, and I think they would take it this time. Because if they don’t, and allow the Dems to cheat to another win, they are effectively allowing themselves to be turned into a liberal activist court as the D’s pack it.
 
But it would be appealed to the SCOTUS, and I think they would take it this time. Because if they don’t, and allow the Dems to cheat to another win, they are effectively allowing themselves to be turned into a liberal activist court as the D’s pack it.
It takes a long time for cases to go to SCOTUS. There wouldn’t be time .

That’s what corrupt local judges would be counting on.

Remember, judges can at the moment do whatever they want.. and months later are ā€œcheckedā€ and/or corrected, usually taking tons of money or support to do so. There’s no immediate check on them

And while it used to be that judges largely wouldn’t let their personal desires get in the way, nowadays I think they do, especially the activist ideologues. Todays democrats are so radical they view JFK democrats as hard alt-right conservatives
 
You are overlooking the obvious. France prohibits mail-in voting because it is too easy to cheat and too hard to detect.
Proving cheating in days is impossible, it takes time to investigate, so the democrats always get away with cheating.
You had four years to prove it last time and failed miserably
 
Back
Top Bottom