Dummies complain about waitresses no longer being taxed on tips while they encourage the waitreses' Medicaid enrolled boyfriends watch TV

[Soupnazi630]

I never really figured that one out or why the Brits are in north Ireland.

Simple

Argentina invaded british territory

 

[Rigby5]

Prove it

{...
To qualify for food stamps (SNAP), applicants must meet specific income and resource limits, residency requirements, and citizenship criteria.

Key Eligibility Criteria​

1. Income Limits:

• Households must have a gross monthly income at or below 130% of the federal poverty level. For example, for a family of three, this limit is approximately $2,798 per month or $33,576 annually for the fiscal year 2025.

...}

 

[Rigby5]

England did not attack Argentina. Argentina invaded British islands

Democrats are Marxists attacking the truth.

England invaded the Falkland Island in 1833 and again in 1982.
There were always Argentine natives living there originally.

{...
Controversy exists over the Falklands' colonisation by Europeans. At various times, the islands have had French, British, Spanish, and Argentine settlements. Britain reasserted its rule in 1833, but Argentina maintains its claim to the islands. In April 1982, Argentine military forces invaded the islands. British administration was restored two months later at the end of the Falklands War. In a 2013 sovereignty referendum, almost all of the votes cast were in favour of remaining a UK overseas territory. The territory's sovereignty status is part of an ongoing dispute between Argentina and the UK.
...}

Marxism is just people wary of corporate wealth and monopolies.

 

[Mack The Finger]

Argentina invaded british territory

I had another post up but changed because I spoke to soon and was wrong.

This is a really good web page if you are interested in the FI.

In 2009 our new Constitution was established which provides enhanced local democracy, internal self-government and enshrines the right of self-determination. Four years later in 2013, we held a referendum which was overseen by international observers, where 99.8% of the electorate voted to remain a British Overseas Territory.

The Falkland Islands have never had any native inhabitants and no indigenous people have ever been displaced, instead the Islands were entirely unoccupied until 1765, when they were first claimed by the British who established a garrison at Port Egmont.

Our History

Our history

www.falklands.gov.fk

 

[Rigby5]

Technically all lies based on what the dummy is told in democrat-Marxist sound bites and headlines

Wrong.
If you were to ever read what Karl Marx actually wrote, you would know that all Marx did was warn us about how corporate monopolies are going to create a new class of wealthy elite oligarchs.

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG

She did not attack Argentina you dumb ************. Aerfentiona styarted that war.

Socialism is immoral inferior and always fails. It pools NOTHING it steals and enslaves. They steal the means of production and then destroy it they do not buy it.

government services are NOT socialism you dumbass

Private schools are still better. Any private mail service works BETTER.

Private enterprises have no monopolies. Socialism creates monopolies

The Falkland are closest to Argentina, so then logically they are the owners.
There were lots of people there before the first British invasion in 1833, so the British have no valid claim. Military superiority is not a basis for a valid claim.

All primates are inherently socialist.
All families, clubs, tribes, etc., are socialist.
The only time you do not have socialism is where some wealthy elite took over by force.
Government services most certainly are Socialism.
And in fact, we should expand socialism to include things like health care as the rest of the world does, and even car production, like Sweden does with Volvo.
Private schools and mail services do NOT "work better" because they cost over twice as much to run.
Private enterprise always tried to create monopolies.
A good example is MicroSoft and how they destroyed Borland.

 

[Rigby5]

I had another post up but changed because I spoke to soon and was wrong.

This is a really good web page if you are interested in the FI.

In 2009 our new Constitution was established which provides enhanced local democracy, internal self-government and enshrines the right of self-determination. Four years later in 2013, we held a referendum which was overseen by international observers, where 99.8% of the electorate voted to remain a British Overseas Territory.

The Falkland Islands have never had any native inhabitants and no indigenous people have ever been displaced, instead the Islands were entirely unoccupied until 1765, when they were first claimed by the British who established a garrison at Port Egmont.

Our History

Our history

www.falklands.gov.fk

Except that is not true.
It is a fake history created by the British invaders.
Before the British invasion of 1833, there were natives, Spanish, French, Dutch, etc., living there.
The British illegally forced all others to leave.

{...
In 1766, France surrendered its claim on the Falklands to Spain, which renamed the French colony Puerto Soledad the following year. Problems began when Spain detected and captured Port Egmont in 1770. War was narrowly avoided by its restitution to Britain in 1771.

The British and Spanish settlements coexisted in the archipelago until 1774, when Britain's new economic and strategic considerations led it to withdraw the garrison from the islands, leaving a plaque claiming the Falklands for King George III. Spain's Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata became the only formal presence in the territory. West Falkland was left abandoned, and Puerto Soledad became a penal colony.
Amid the British invasions of the Río de la Plata during the Napoleonic Wars in Europe, the islands' governor evacuated the archipelago in 1806; Spain's remaining colonial garrison followed suit in 1811, except for gauchos and fishermen who remained voluntarily.
...}

 

[Rigby5]

Simple

Argentina invaded british territory

The closest country was Argentina, and the Spanish built colonies there.
The British abandoned any colony they originally had.

 

[Mack The Finger]

Except that is not true.
It is a fake history created by the British invaders.
Before the British invasion of 1833, there were natives, Spanish, French, Dutch, etc., living there.
The British illegally forced all others to leave.

In 1764, French colonists established the settlement of Port Louis on East Falkland. The following year, 1765, a British expedition reached West Falkland and took formal possession of it and all neighbouring islands in the name of the British crown.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No one has been able to give verified data about able bodied males on Medicaid.

It's a lie.

 

[jc456]

Don't be 'concerned right now for the taxation short fall. That's comes later for some other politician to take the heat.

For now the fascist regime can benefit from millions of workers expressing their thanks at the ballot box!

Huh?

 

[jc456]

No one has been able to give verified data about able bodied males on Medicaid.

It's a lie.

Prove it, where’s your counter information?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

The "big, beautiful bill" features a new tax break for older Americans who pay taxes on Social Security income. But there's a significant catch.

Why it matters: The break leaves out the poorest seniors — who already don't pay Social Security taxes —and the very rich ones, too.

How it works: Both the House and Senate bills include an increased tax deduction for tax filers age 64 and older. In the Senate version, the new deduction is $6,000 for individuals and $12,000 for couples.

• The deduction starts phasing out for those who earn over $75,000 ($150,000 for couples), and phases out completely at $175,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples, in the Senate version.
• The break expires in 2028 when President Trump leaves office, as do a few other White House priorities in the bills, including no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on auto loan interest.

What they're saying: "This amounts to the largest tax break in American history for our nation's seniors," per a report out earlier this week from the White House Council of Economic Advisers.

Yes, but: Most seniors — 64% of them — don't pay taxes on Social Security, according to the White House's own analysis.

https://www.axios.com/2025/07/03/big-beautiful-bill-social-security

So the tax cut for billionaires or the top 1% is permanent while the tax breaks for seniors and on tips & overtime expire in 3 years?

How generous.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

US companies' tax windfall fuels record share buybacks​

AP News
https://apnews.com › article
Apr 4, 2019 — US corporations spent a record amount buying back their own shares last year, using 2017's tax-cut windfall to reward shareholders rather than to invest or
or expand their businesses.

Companies in the S&P 500 spent $806 billion on stock buybacks in 2018, blowing away the previous record of nearly $590 billion set in 2007. The information technology and financial service sectors were the biggest spenders, with Apple leading the pack. When share prices plunged in the fourth quarter it only encouraged companies to spend more, setting a fourth consecutive quarterly record for buybacks.

Companies can return profits to shareholders either via dividends or buybacks. Buying back shares has the advantage of reducing the number of shares outstanding, which often gives a boost to closely watched financial metrics such as earnings per share.

 

[BULLDOG]

So the lower income are getting the break here and the rich aren’t? Contradicting yourself already

If you are so stupid to think your remark makes sense I feel sorry for you.

 

[struth]

If you are so stupid to think your remark makes sense I feel sorry for you.

You seem to be all over the map, your dembot rage can’t seem to allow you to make a clear point

Are you mad that people don’t pay taxes on 25k worth of tips they can earn or not?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Just like last time, Trump's tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations are permanent.
Tax cuts for the rest of us are temporary.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Democrats are notoriously lousy tippers anyway.
They really have nothing to ***** about about because they don't contribute anything of any worth to the tip wage totals. I know through acquaintances that work in the political fundraising field that Elizabeth Warren for instance there's an extremely cheap pitch when it comes to leaving a tip at a restaurant. Atypical Lefty.

Side note - you can tell a lot about a persons character by how they tip.
A real selfish asshole like Jerry Seinfeld, known to avoid fans like the plague. In an interview he was asked about this - his response to that question was a story about uncivil people. Seriously.
So on his show "Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee" - he was with Julia Dreyfus. He is paying the waitress, Dreyfus asks him "how much are you tipping her?" - he responds "20%" She can't believe it. "Jerry you are a very-very wealthy man and a star - and you are only going to tip her like $10??" - "Why would I tip more?"
Because he is a selfish prick.
Julia Dreyfuss ended up giving a larger tip.

 

[struth]

Just like last time, Trump's tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations are permanent.
Tax cuts for the rest of us are temporary.

If it was permanent last time, why does it need to be again this time?

Do you ever think before you post?

 

[healthmyths]

WRONG

She did not attack Argentina you dumb ************. Aerfentiona styarted that war.

Socialism is immoral inferior and always fails. It pools NOTHING it steals and enslaves. They steal the means of production and then destroy it they do not buy it.

government services are NOT socialism you dumbass

Private schools are still better. Any private mail service works BETTER.

Private enterprises have no monopolies. Socialism creates monopolies

One point socialists totally forget is who makes the decisions and are responsible the results?
So you are part of a factory making screws. Who makes the decisions like, safe equipment vs cheaper ? Who decides what the pay will be? OH I'm sure there are committees in socialism but someone has to say the vote is yea/nay.
Are they paid more because they take that responsibility? Or are decisions regarding human safety done by a committee while the building burns and who comes to put fire out telling the crews what to do...another committee?