Dummies complain about waitresses no longer being taxed on tips while they encourage the waitreses' Medicaid enrolled boyfriends watch TV

The billionaires are democrats. List the top ten billionaires in the usa
Yeah there's a lot more left-leaning billionaires than there are conservative ones. However make no mistake they have much more in common with each other no matter what side of the aisle they fall upon then they do with us.
 
The corporate billionaires are democrats. Give us a list of the Ten top billionaires in the USA. They are all democrats.

Who controls the most money, trillions, all democrats
Democrats are just as bad and probably worse. The point is that they're the working class and their enemy is the working class.

Not the billionaires as you suggest.
 
How can you be so wrong ? Waitress depend on tips.

BTW: Do you have a link with specifics of billionaires get tax breaks ?

And please not some satanic press quote that says: Billionaires get tax breaks.

In all my time posting on message boards one LIB responded to that question with a link. And tho I would not agree with him 100% it did CLEARY show one incident how the rich were beating the Tax Man with a loop hole.



1751660409246.webp

  • The ultra-rich in the top 10 percent of income get 68 percent of the total benefits of this legislation.

The Big Bill for Billionaires gives the ultra-rich a massive tax cut​

JCT separately estimated the distributional effects of only the tax provisions in the bill. They found that working-class people get no tax cut, and in some cases a tax increase, while the ultra-rich get tens of thousands in tax cuts a year. Specifically:

  • An average household making less than $15,000 a year will see a tax increase of nearly 12 percent in 2027. By 2033, when many provisions in the tax portion of the law expire, this group will experience a 73 percent tax increase.
  • While people earning $40,000 a year will see an average tax decrease of only $442, worth a few weeks of groceries, people making over $1 million a year will see their taxes go down by $79,000 in 2027.
  • In 2027, people making over $500,000 a year will get a $168 BILLION reduction in the total taxes they owe.

The Big Bill for Billionaires sets a new precedent for wealth transfers to the ultra-rich​

In 2017, President Trump and Republicans enacted the so-called Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), a historically bad bill which increased the deficit by $1.9 trillion. That bill gave massive handouts to the ultra-rich, but the Big Bill for Billionaires makes the 2017 tax breaks for the richest few look small by comparison.

  • The TCJA gave people making over $500,000 a year an average tax cut of $35,000 the first year after enactment. By comparison, the Big Bill for Billionaires will give people making over $500,000 a tax cut of $58,000 in the first year alone.
  • The TCJA transferred a total of $36.9 billion dollars to people making over $1 million a year in just the first year after the bill was enacted. The new bill will more than double that number, giving people making over $1 million a year $93.6 billion in tax cuts for 2027 alone.
  • While the TCJA worsened inequality, it gave very modest tax cuts (around $20 dollars a year) to the lowest income earners. The Big Bill for Billionaires will ask the lowest earners to pay higher taxes every year.
  • Because this bill is coupled with draconian spending cuts that intentionally target working Americans, on net, the bill is even crueler and more unequal than TCJA.
 
Poor waitresses, i.e. people who get tips are considered by the dummies as bad as billionaires who don't pay taxes, now under the new bill.
BUT these dummies are all upset that the following adults who ARE ABLE-BODIED don't want to work but watch TV be required to work to get Medicaid!
How truly dumb are these people?
"Able-bodied adults on Medicaid: Approximately 7 to 10 million able-bodied, non-working adults without dependents are estimated to be enrolled in Medicaid. Data from December 2022 showed about 13.9 million able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) on Medicaid.
Time spent watching TV/gaming: Some reports indicate that non-working, able-bodied Medicaid recipients spend a significant amount of time on these activities, such as an average of 4.2 hours per day. Another report claimed 125 hours per month.
Gender: In 2023, around 46% of Medicaid recipients were male.
Important Considerations:

Work Requirements: Discussions about Medicaid often involve work requirements for able-bodied adults.
Data Limitations: The available data, while informative, does not provide a precise figure for the specific group (able-bodied, TV game-watching males on Medicaid). Further detailed analysis would be required to get a more accurate count.
These statistics are part of a broader discussion about Medicaid and its recipients, and they do not capture the full complexities of the individuals enrolled in the program.
Congressman Aderholt Backs Speaker Johnson: New Data Shows Able-bodied Medicaid Recipients Spend Over 120 Hours a Month Watching TV and Playing Video Games Instead of Working
June 3, 2025
Press Release
Congressman Robert Aderholt (AL-04) today issued the following statement in strong support of Speaker Mike Johnson’s comments regarding waste and abuse in the Medicaid system, following a new report exposing how non-working Medicaid recipients are spending their time.

Speaker Johnson hit the nail on the head when he said Medicaid shouldn’t be going to ‘29-year-old males sitting on their couches playing video games.’
The American Enterprise Institute’s new analysis confirms it: many able-bodied Medicaid recipients who aren’t working are spending their time — not looking for jobs — but glued to screens.”

According to the AEI study, non-working Medicaid recipients without children spend an average of 4.2 hours every day watching TV and playing video games.
That adds up to 125 hours per month — time that could be used for working, volunteering, or gaining job skill
crack-that-whip-devo.gif
 
Democrats are notoriously lousy tippers anyway.
They really have nothing to ***** about about because they don't contribute anything of any worth to the tip wage totals. I know through acquaintances that work in the political fundraising field that Elizabeth Warren for instance there's an extremely cheap pitch when it comes to leaving a tip at a restaurant. Atypical Lefty.
Really, how long were you a waiter?
 
You prove my point, a waitress is over taxed by democrats and now needs food stamps and welfare from democrats.

sound like democrat marxism
That's absurd.
 
You prove my point, a waitress is over taxed by democrats and now needs food stamps and welfare from democrats.

sound like democrat marxism
Considering the tax plan of Trumps has been in place since 2017 I'd say you are full of shit blaming the Dems.
 
The zero tax is only fer the first 25k the rest is taxed...Strippers were very disappointed..
 
Democrats are notoriously lousy tippers anyway.
They really have nothing to ***** about about because they don't contribute anything of any worth to the tip wage totals. I know through acquaintances that work in the political fundraising field that Elizabeth Warren for instance there's an extremely cheap pitch when it comes to leaving a tip at a restaurant. Atypical Lefty.
The truly sad aspect about a majority of today Democrats is their only chance of future existence is to be the person in power. So the Democrat NYC mayor Zohran Mamdani truly doesn't care about what he says... for example he declared on once admitted that identifying himself as African American would be “misleading” — despite him ticking that as his race on his Columbia University application.
Newly resurfaced video captured the 33-year-old making the acknowledgment as he was sprayed with questions on the campaign trial about his heritage.
“I’m an Indian, Ugandan, New Yorker,” Mamdani told black performance artist Crackhead Barney when she approached him on the street in April.
 
15th post
The "big, beautiful bill" features a new tax break for older Americans who pay taxes on Social Security income. But there's a significant catch.

Why it matters: The break leaves out the poorest seniors — who already don't pay Social Security taxes —and the very rich ones, too.

How it works: Both the House and Senate bills include an increased tax deduction for tax filers age 64 and older. In the Senate version, the new deduction is $6,000 for individuals and $12,000 for couples.


  • The deduction starts phasing out for those who earn over $75,000 ($150,000 for couples), and phases out completely at $175,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples, in the Senate version.
  • The break expires in 2028 when President Trump leaves office, as do a few other White House priorities in the bills, including no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on auto loan interest.
What they're saying: "This amounts to the largest tax break in American history for our nation's seniors," per a report out earlier this week from the White House Council of Economic Advisers.

Yes, but: Most seniors — 64% of them — don't pay taxes on Social Security, according to the White House's own analysis.

So your complaint is that seniors who don’t pay any federal tax at all won’t be getting a reduction on taxes?
 
So your complaint is that seniors who don’t pay any federal tax at all won’t be getting a reduction on taxes?
True. Since they are already at an income level where they are not taxed.
 
For yous they be...You hate humankind and reject the guidance of Jesus Christ, what's new?
Really know everything about me right?
He emphasized personal accountability:
Jesus' teachings and parables highlight that individuals are accountable for their choices and actions.
The parable of the talents, for example, illustrates this by showing servants rewarded or punished based on their faithful management of their master's resource.
 
Back
Top Bottom