Drug giant official: Cohen was 'promising access' after Trump election

[Correll]

The question is - Who is paying Avenatti? Stormy has admitted it ain't her......

Got a link for that? And, if Avenatti is doing it pro bono, it's great publicity for him, as well as will get him a lot more clients. You can't buy this kind of advertising.

Speaking of money, Daniels recently admitted that she’s not paying Michael Avenatti’s attorney fees.

DALLAS!!! 2 shows on Saturday night! stormydaniels on Instagram: “DALLAS!!! 2 shows on Saturday night!”


— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) April 26, 2018


Who ******* cares!!! You’ll be dancing until you’re 60 to pay Avenatti attorney fees


— Chevy Lover (@camaroking2018) April 26, 2018


Except I'm not paying him. Haha!

— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) April 26, 2018


If Skanky Daniels isn’t paying her attorney fees, who is? What wants her to keep talking? Who’s really behind this? This detail seems kind of important, wouldn’t you say?

Avenatti is doing this PR... Do you think he will not be able to charge an arm and leg to the next one... Lawyers do high profile cases all the time pro bono... Avenatti

But this time, it's Trump, and libs can act like it's something brand new, never been done before, and use it to gin up their base, who we all know are dumb as rocks.

Certainly I can agree to a point, but this behavior still sets a bad example. Our politicians are now openly suggesting to the public that we 'ignore', hence 'accept' their own personal corruption. The 'that's politics' mantra is a tool for the corrupt and an exercise in futility. Wrong is wrong. The public at large will never go for being ripped off.

You want to change the rules and you hold both sides to the same, new standards? Let's talk.


You just HAPPEN to want to make an issue of it NOW, when it will undermine my side's agenda, and sort of talk about changing the rules, but not really do it?

**** NO.

And who knows, if they keep yelling as loud as they can, they might convince new stupid people that they are onto something.

I just don't understand why you can't be patient with the investigation. Watergate took years.

Because the point is NOT the end result of the investigation, but using the accusations of wrongdoing, valid or not, to undermine our side's political capital.


Not to mention the core accusation was bullshit to start with and has obviously degenerated into nothing but perjury traps.

And what else are they going to do? Talk honestly or seriously about the issues? LOL!!!

Are you?

Whenever I can.

Not sure what group you are referring to with "you folks".


I am all about serious discussion of the issues. It just is so rare.


So terribly sadly rare.

Indeed.[/QUOTE]



And partisan accusations like this, are one of the techniques used to deflect discussion away from the actual issues.[/QUOTE]

The thing is normal presidents would a through investigation done and to be vindicated.[/QUOTE]


Interesting claim.

Look at the Uranium One issue. The Clinton would have no problem with an investigation, it would be investigated and they would be cleared, already news sources have clearly shown this to be bogus...

Would it? Or would their partisan operatives in the FBI or Justice Department make it go away, as we have seen.

Did Hillary insult Comey during the Email issue? No.. She knew she was innocent and accepted the result even though she was very hard done. It is not FBI to discuss on going investigations and release a statement when the person was found reason to continue.

She was guilty, and the only reason that she got off, was a partisan operative of the Dems, in the FBI, changed the report to down play her wrong doing to below that of a crime, and Comey let it go.

Look at Mueller, no statements, no accusations.... The accusations against Trump are all speculation.

Plenty of leaks though.

I will contrast to Ken Starr who held almost daily press briefings and ended up threatening a young girl(Monica) by sending her and her mother to jail unless she testified on a consensual sexual encounter.

The consensual sexual encounter was relevant to Bill Clinton's behavior with subordinates, and thus Paula Jone's sexual harassment claims.

Do you believe that Bill Clinton sexually harassed Paula Jones?

Trump should just let the investigation go along and cut the comments... It just makes him look worse. Mueller is an investigator, thats it, if a police officer stops you tomorrow do you start by insulting him?

Trump should, at the very least, wage war against Mueller and his witch hunt.


No, I don't start by insulting him. If he starts investigating me for no reason, and keeps investigating even when he finds out that the reason he pulled me over was wrong, and just starts fishing,

then I will ******* insult him. I will hire a lawyer and file harassment charges.

 

[CowboyTed]

The question is - Who is paying Avenatti? Stormy has admitted it ain't her......

Got a link for that? And, if Avenatti is doing it pro bono, it's great publicity for him, as well as will get him a lot more clients. You can't buy this kind of advertising.

Speaking of money, Daniels recently admitted that she’s not paying Michael Avenatti’s attorney fees.

DALLAS!!! 2 shows on Saturday night! stormydaniels on Instagram: “DALLAS!!! 2 shows on Saturday night!”


— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) April 26, 2018


Who ******* cares!!! You’ll be dancing until you’re 60 to pay Avenatti attorney fees


— Chevy Lover (@camaroking2018) April 26, 2018


Except I'm not paying him. Haha!

— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) April 26, 2018


If Skanky Daniels isn’t paying her attorney fees, who is? What wants her to keep talking? Who’s really behind this? This detail seems kind of important, wouldn’t you say?

Avenatti is doing this PR... Do you think he will not be able to charge an arm and leg to the next one... Lawyers do high profile cases all the time pro bono... Avenatti

But this time, it's Trump, and libs can act like it's something brand new, never been done before, and use it to gin up their base, who we all know are dumb as rocks.

Certainly I can agree to a point, but this behavior still sets a bad example. Our politicians are now openly suggesting to the public that we 'ignore', hence 'accept' their own personal corruption. The 'that's politics' mantra is a tool for the corrupt and an exercise in futility. Wrong is wrong. The public at large will never go for being ripped off.

You want to change the rules and you hold both sides to the same, new standards? Let's talk.


You just HAPPEN to want to make an issue of it NOW, when it will undermine my side's agenda, and sort of talk about changing the rules, but not really do it?

**** NO.

And who knows, if they keep yelling as loud as they can, they might convince new stupid people that they are onto something.

I just don't understand why you can't be patient with the investigation. Watergate took years.

Because the point is NOT the end result of the investigation, but using the accusations of wrongdoing, valid or not, to undermine our side's political capital.


Not to mention the core accusation was bullshit to start with and has obviously degenerated into nothing but perjury traps.

And what else are they going to do? Talk honestly or seriously about the issues? LOL!!!

Are you?

Whenever I can.

Not sure what group you are referring to with "you folks".


I am all about serious discussion of the issues. It just is so rare.


So terribly sadly rare.

Indeed.

And partisan accusations like this, are one of the techniques used to deflect discussion away from the actual issues.[/QUOTE]

The thing is normal presidents would a through investigation done and to be vindicated.[/QUOTE]


Interesting claim.

Look at the Uranium One issue. The Clinton would have no problem with an investigation, it would be investigated and they would be cleared, already news sources have clearly shown this to be bogus...

Would it? Or would their partisan operatives in the FBI or Justice Department make it go away, as we have seen.

Did Hillary insult Comey during the Email issue? No.. She knew she was innocent and accepted the result even though she was very hard done. It is not FBI to discuss on going investigations and release a statement when the person was found reason to continue.

She was guilty, and the only reason that she got off, was a partisan operative of the Dems, in the FBI, changed the report to down play her wrong doing to below that of a crime, and Comey let it go.

Look at Mueller, no statements, no accusations.... The accusations against Trump are all speculation.

Plenty of leaks though.

I will contrast to Ken Starr who held almost daily press briefings and ended up threatening a young girl(Monica) by sending her and her mother to jail unless she testified on a consensual sexual encounter.

The consensual sexual encounter was relevant to Bill Clinton's behavior with subordinates, and thus Paula Jone's sexual harassment claims.

Do you believe that Bill Clinton sexually harassed Paula Jones?

Trump should just let the investigation go along and cut the comments... It just makes him look worse. Mueller is an investigator, thats it, if a police officer stops you tomorrow do you start by insulting him?

Trump should, at the very least, wage war against Mueller and his witch hunt.


No, I don't start by insulting him. If he starts investigating me for no reason, and keeps investigating even when he finds out that the reason he pulled me over was wrong, and just starts fishing,

then I will ******* insult him. I will hire a lawyer and file harassment charges.[/QUOTE]

Do you believe that Bill Clinton sexually harassed Paula Jones? He denies it... Paula Jones would never won in court, it would be he said she said case...

Did Mueller initiate the investigation into Trump. actually he has said to Trump he not a target but a subject of the investigation... Where is the harassment?

People have already pleaded guilty. The original crime of breaking into a democrat server and stealing emails is the original crime. Mueller was directed to investigate that crime and all other crimes linked to the campaign by a Trump appointee...

Sorry your attacking the person who he indirectly appointed. The investigation was started due to overwhelming evidence from the intelligence community.

The Trump campaign was the ones looking for back channels to russian spys

 

[Seawytch]

Novartis official: Michael Cohen was 'promising access' after Trump election

Play for pay..simple as that, I guess:


"President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, contacted the drug giant Novartis after the 2016 election "promising access" to the new administration, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller later requested information from the company about the offer, a senior official inside Novartis told NBC News on Wednesday.

"He [Cohen] contacted us after the new administration was in place," the official said. "He was promising access to the new administration."

The disclosure came after an attorney representing the adult-film actress who says she had an affair with Trump released a summary of bank transactions that he says shows payments from various companies to a company controlled by Cohen.

That lawyer, Michael Avenatti, said the transactions suggest that Cohen was "selling access to the President of the United States." Cohen, his attorney and the White House did not respond to a request for comment."

That's what lobbyists do, moron.

He was not a lobbyist..asshole. He was Trump's personal lawyer and he parleyed that into some big bucks.

I swear you get dumber with time.

Your Komrads in here claim he's a lobbyist. Take it up with them.

YOU claimed he was a lobbyist. You were the one that said “that’s what lobbyists do”.

 

[Correll]

The question is - Who is paying Avenatti? Stormy has admitted it ain't her......

Got a link for that? And, if Avenatti is doing it pro bono, it's great publicity for him, as well as will get him a lot more clients. You can't buy this kind of advertising.

Speaking of money, Daniels recently admitted that she’s not paying Michael Avenatti’s attorney fees.

DALLAS!!! 2 shows on Saturday night! stormydaniels on Instagram: “DALLAS!!! 2 shows on Saturday night!”


— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) April 26, 2018


Who ******* cares!!! You’ll be dancing until you’re 60 to pay Avenatti attorney fees


— Chevy Lover (@camaroking2018) April 26, 2018


Except I'm not paying him. Haha!

— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) April 26, 2018


If Skanky Daniels isn’t paying her attorney fees, who is? What wants her to keep talking? Who’s really behind this? This detail seems kind of important, wouldn’t you say?

Avenatti is doing this PR... Do you think he will not be able to charge an arm and leg to the next one... Lawyers do high profile cases all the time pro bono... Avenatti

But this time, it's Trump, and libs can act like it's something brand new, never been done before, and use it to gin up their base, who we all know are dumb as rocks.

Certainly I can agree to a point, but this behavior still sets a bad example. Our politicians are now openly suggesting to the public that we 'ignore', hence 'accept' their own personal corruption. The 'that's politics' mantra is a tool for the corrupt and an exercise in futility. Wrong is wrong. The public at large will never go for being ripped off.

You want to change the rules and you hold both sides to the same, new standards? Let's talk.


You just HAPPEN to want to make an issue of it NOW, when it will undermine my side's agenda, and sort of talk about changing the rules, but not really do it?

**** NO.

And who knows, if they keep yelling as loud as they can, they might convince new stupid people that they are onto something.

I just don't understand why you can't be patient with the investigation. Watergate took years.

Because the point is NOT the end result of the investigation, but using the accusations of wrongdoing, valid or not, to undermine our side's political capital.


Not to mention the core accusation was bullshit to start with and has obviously degenerated into nothing but perjury traps.

And what else are they going to do? Talk honestly or seriously about the issues? LOL!!!

Are you?

Whenever I can.

Not sure what group you are referring to with "you folks".


I am all about serious discussion of the issues. It just is so rare.


So terribly sadly rare.

Indeed.

And partisan accusations like this, are one of the techniques used to deflect discussion away from the actual issues.

The thing is normal presidents would a through investigation done and to be vindicated.[/QUOTE]


Interesting claim.

Look at the Uranium One issue. The Clinton would have no problem with an investigation, it would be investigated and they would be cleared, already news sources have clearly shown this to be bogus...

Would it? Or would their partisan operatives in the FBI or Justice Department make it go away, as we have seen.

Did Hillary insult Comey during the Email issue? No.. She knew she was innocent and accepted the result even though she was very hard done. It is not FBI to discuss on going investigations and release a statement when the person was found reason to continue.

She was guilty, and the only reason that she got off, was a partisan operative of the Dems, in the FBI, changed the report to down play her wrong doing to below that of a crime, and Comey let it go.

Look at Mueller, no statements, no accusations.... The accusations against Trump are all speculation.

Plenty of leaks though.

I will contrast to Ken Starr who held almost daily press briefings and ended up threatening a young girl(Monica) by sending her and her mother to jail unless she testified on a consensual sexual encounter.

The consensual sexual encounter was relevant to Bill Clinton's behavior with subordinates, and thus Paula Jone's sexual harassment claims.

Do you believe that Bill Clinton sexually harassed Paula Jones?

Trump should just let the investigation go along and cut the comments... It just makes him look worse. Mueller is an investigator, thats it, if a police officer stops you tomorrow do you start by insulting him?

Trump should, at the very least, wage war against Mueller and his witch hunt.


No, I don't start by insulting him. If he starts investigating me for no reason, and keeps investigating even when he finds out that the reason he pulled me over was wrong, and just starts fishing,

then I will ******* insult him. I will hire a lawyer and file harassment charges.[/QUOTE]

Do you believe that Bill Clinton sexually harassed Paula Jones? He denies it... Paula Jones would never won in court, it would be he said she said case...[/QUOTE]


Of course Bill Clinton sexually harassed Paula Jones. Bill Clinton denied having sex with Moncia too. Until he was caught.

Did Mueller initiate the investigation into Trump. actually he has said to Trump he not a target but a subject of the investigation... Where is the harassment?

The constant fishing to find something to undermine his Presidency with.

People have already pleaded guilty. The original crime of breaking into a democrat server and stealing emails is the original crime. Mueller was directed to investigate that crime and all other crimes linked to the campaign by a Trump appointee...

Of meaningless process crimes and perjury traps. Notice when libs crow about people going to jail, they never mention what the "crime" was.

Because they know it is all bullshit.

Sorry your attacking the person who he indirectly appointed. The investigation was started due to overwhelming evidence from the intelligence community.

Yeah, that's what they said. THen we learned what they really had, The Steele Dossier. Total bullshit.

 

[ABikerSailor]

You know what I find fascinating about this story? EVERYONE (even the lobbyists on K street) thought that Trump would lose, so they never took any time to cultivate a relationship with him.

When he won? The lobbyists FREAKED because nobody had connections to Trump so they could schmooze their way into the WH and influence policy.

The only reason Cohen got away with as much as he did was because he was selling himself as Trump's personal attorney, and that he could provide insight into how Trump thinks on various things like medicine, telecommunications and real estate dealings. They bought the story and gave him a contract and a whole bunch of money only to find out that he WASN'T a lobbyist, and he DIDN'T have great access to Trump.

What's even funnier, is that Novartis figured it out only a month into the contract, but were scared of the relationship they thought Cohen had with Trump and decided to pay the money anyway.

What a waste.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Lol...Communist, eh? It would appear that you have no idea what that is...not a surprise.
Whatever, i don't think that Trump even knew about what Cohen was doing...I doubt he would have approved.

Yawn;

You Bolshevik motherfuckers don't even hide it anymore.

{Democratic voters in every age group, every gender, and every race view socialism favorably, according to the early February telephone poll of 1,000 likely Democratic primary voters fielded by Republican firm OnMessage Inc. and commissioned by AAN, which is tied to the Congressional Leadership Fund super PAC dedicated to House Republicans. And among people 45 and under — a group that has helped power Sanders’ primary performances — the ideology is preferred to capitalism by a margin of 46 percent to 19 percent.}

Poll: Democratic voters support socialism, nationalizing major industries

You're ******* Communists - fact.

As for Cohen, have you Stalinists or the Inquisition come up with anything like, you know, a crime?

Of course not, this is a witch hunt, no need for fact. You have witches to burn, no need to get caught up with evidence..

 

[Uncensored2008]

Gee I wonder if all the people and companies that made huge donations to the Clinton Foundation were looking to get access to her?

Clinton Foundation is a charity... Charity's books are audited...

If the Clinton's were using a Charity for pay to play it would be a horrendous idea, just get a buddy to register as a lobbyist...

The whole Clinton Foundation story is just bullshit... Bill and Hillary Clinton didn't even take a salary...

Just because Trump is corrupt doesn't mean the Clintons are.

******* Stalinists....

The Clinton Foundation is a slush fund for collecting bribes, a money laundering scheme, since literally everything with the Clinton Organized Crime Family is pay to play, as you full well know.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The thing is normal presidents would a through investigation done and to be vindicated.

Look at the Uranium One issue. The Clinton would have no problem with an investigation, it would be investigated and they would be cleared, already news sources have clearly shown this to be bogus...

Did Hillary insult Comey during the Email issue? No.. She knew she was innocent and accepted the result even though she was very hard done. It is not FBI to discuss on going investigations and release a statement when the person was found reason to continue.
Look at Mueller, no statements, no accusations.... The accusations against Trump are all speculation.

I will contrast to Ken Starr who held almost daily press briefings and ended up threatening a young girl(Monica) by sending her and her mother to jail unless she testified on a consensual sexual encounter.

Trump should just let the investigation go along and cut the comments... It just makes him look worse. Mueller is an investigator, thats it, if a police officer stops you tomorrow do you start by insulting him?

Avenatti is a pimp. His whore will provide him with a portion of what the Soros group pays her for her attacks on Trump. He pimped "Stormy" to Trump and now does what so many pimps do, blackmails the John.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Novartis official: Michael Cohen was 'promising access' after Trump election

Play for pay..simple as that, I guess:


"President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, contacted the drug giant Novartis after the 2016 election "promising access" to the new administration, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller later requested information from the company about the offer, a senior official inside Novartis told NBC News on Wednesday.

"He [Cohen] contacted us after the new administration was in place," the official said. "He was promising access to the new administration."

The disclosure came after an attorney representing the adult-film actress who says she had an affair with Trump released a summary of bank transactions that he says shows payments from various companies to a company controlled by Cohen.

That lawyer, Michael Avenatti, said the transactions suggest that Cohen was "selling access to the President of the United States." Cohen, his attorney and the White House did not respond to a request for comment."

Big ******* deal.

Kind of is.... Personal lawyer to the President is selling access, pay for play... This is red handed...

Trump campaigned against this but he took meetings with Novartis.

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

The Looney Tunes Left is at it again.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Novartis official: Michael Cohen was 'promising access' after Trump election

Play for pay..simple as that, I guess:


"President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, contacted the drug giant Novartis after the 2016 election "promising access" to the new administration, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller later requested information from the company about the offer, a senior official inside Novartis told NBC News on Wednesday.

"He [Cohen] contacted us after the new administration was in place," the official said. "He was promising access to the new administration."

The disclosure came after an attorney representing the adult-film actress who says she had an affair with Trump released a summary of bank transactions that he says shows payments from various companies to a company controlled by Cohen.

That lawyer, Michael Avenatti, said the transactions suggest that Cohen was "selling access to the President of the United States." Cohen, his attorney and the White House did not respond to a request for comment."

Big ******* deal.

Kind of is.... Personal lawyer to the President is selling access, pay for play... This is red handed...

Trump campaigned against this but he took meetings with Novartis.

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

You're right.....................lobbyists are nothing new nor are they illegal.

However...................operating as a lobbyist without being registered as one IS illegal.

 

[Correll]

Novartis official: Michael Cohen was 'promising access' after Trump election

Play for pay..simple as that, I guess:


"President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, contacted the drug giant Novartis after the 2016 election "promising access" to the new administration, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller later requested information from the company about the offer, a senior official inside Novartis told NBC News on Wednesday.

"He [Cohen] contacted us after the new administration was in place," the official said. "He was promising access to the new administration."

The disclosure came after an attorney representing the adult-film actress who says she had an affair with Trump released a summary of bank transactions that he says shows payments from various companies to a company controlled by Cohen.

That lawyer, Michael Avenatti, said the transactions suggest that Cohen was "selling access to the President of the United States." Cohen, his attorney and the White House did not respond to a request for comment."

Big ******* deal.

Kind of is.... Personal lawyer to the President is selling access, pay for play... This is red handed...

Trump campaigned against this but he took meetings with Novartis.

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

You're right.....................lobbyists are nothing new nor are they illegal.

However...................operating as a lobbyist without being registered as one IS illegal.

When is the last time that a dem got arrested and convicted of such a crime?

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Novartis official: Michael Cohen was 'promising access' after Trump election

Play for pay..simple as that, I guess:


"President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, contacted the drug giant Novartis after the 2016 election "promising access" to the new administration, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller later requested information from the company about the offer, a senior official inside Novartis told NBC News on Wednesday.

"He [Cohen] contacted us after the new administration was in place," the official said. "He was promising access to the new administration."

The disclosure came after an attorney representing the adult-film actress who says she had an affair with Trump released a summary of bank transactions that he says shows payments from various companies to a company controlled by Cohen.

That lawyer, Michael Avenatti, said the transactions suggest that Cohen was "selling access to the President of the United States." Cohen, his attorney and the White House did not respond to a request for comment."

Big ******* deal.

Kind of is.... Personal lawyer to the President is selling access, pay for play... This is red handed...

Trump campaigned against this but he took meetings with Novartis.

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

You're right.....................lobbyists are nothing new nor are they illegal.

However...................operating as a lobbyist without being registered as one IS illegal.

When is the last time that a dem got arrested and convicted of such a crime?

Well..there's this:

Convicted ex-lawmakers enjoy access as lobbyists

 

[bripat9643]

Novartis official: Michael Cohen was 'promising access' after Trump election

Play for pay..simple as that, I guess:


"President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, contacted the drug giant Novartis after the 2016 election "promising access" to the new administration, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller later requested information from the company about the offer, a senior official inside Novartis told NBC News on Wednesday.

"He [Cohen] contacted us after the new administration was in place," the official said. "He was promising access to the new administration."

The disclosure came after an attorney representing the adult-film actress who says she had an affair with Trump released a summary of bank transactions that he says shows payments from various companies to a company controlled by Cohen.

That lawyer, Michael Avenatti, said the transactions suggest that Cohen was "selling access to the President of the United States." Cohen, his attorney and the White House did not respond to a request for comment."

Big ******* deal.

Kind of is.... Personal lawyer to the President is selling access, pay for play... This is red handed...

Trump campaigned against this but he took meetings with Novartis.

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

You're right.....................lobbyists are nothing new nor are they illegal.

However...................operating as a lobbyist without being registered as one IS illegal.

He hasn't lobbied anyone at this point, moron.

 

[Correll]

Big ******* deal.

Kind of is.... Personal lawyer to the President is selling access, pay for play... This is red handed...

Trump campaigned against this but he took meetings with Novartis.

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

You're right.....................lobbyists are nothing new nor are they illegal.

However...................operating as a lobbyist without being registered as one IS illegal.

When is the last time that a dem got arrested and convicted of such a crime?

Well..there's this:

Convicted ex-lawmakers enjoy access as lobbyists

Kind of the exact opposite of what I asked for.


Instead of a dem being arrested and convicted FOR lobbying,

you gave me a dem arrested and convicted, so he THEN started lobbying.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Kind of is.... Personal lawyer to the President is selling access, pay for play... This is red handed...

Trump campaigned against this but he took meetings with Novartis.

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

You're right.....................lobbyists are nothing new nor are they illegal.

However...................operating as a lobbyist without being registered as one IS illegal.

When is the last time that a dem got arrested and convicted of such a crime?

Well..there's this:

Convicted ex-lawmakers enjoy access as lobbyists

Kind of the exact opposite of what I asked for.


Instead of a dem being arrested and convicted FOR lobbying,

you gave me a dem arrested and convicted, so he THEN started lobbying.

Ii know...but i found it amusing..so there you are. i guess he thought that he'd get the arrested part over with first..then start making money...***smart***

 

[ABikerSailor]

Novartis official: Michael Cohen was 'promising access' after Trump election

Play for pay..simple as that, I guess:


"President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, contacted the drug giant Novartis after the 2016 election "promising access" to the new administration, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller later requested information from the company about the offer, a senior official inside Novartis told NBC News on Wednesday.

"He [Cohen] contacted us after the new administration was in place," the official said. "He was promising access to the new administration."

The disclosure came after an attorney representing the adult-film actress who says she had an affair with Trump released a summary of bank transactions that he says shows payments from various companies to a company controlled by Cohen.

That lawyer, Michael Avenatti, said the transactions suggest that Cohen was "selling access to the President of the United States." Cohen, his attorney and the White House did not respond to a request for comment."

Big ******* deal.

Kind of is.... Personal lawyer to the President is selling access, pay for play... This is red handed...

Trump campaigned against this but he took meetings with Novartis.

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

You're right.....................lobbyists are nothing new nor are they illegal.

However...................operating as a lobbyist without being registered as one IS illegal.

He hasn't lobbied anyone at this point, moron.

They already know he was trying to sell access to Trump which is illegal. And, they are also looking into those deals to see if he actually did operate as a lobbyist or not. Either way, he was trying to get rich off of Trump's coat tails. And that at a minimum, is unethical.

 

[bripat9643]

Big ******* deal.

Kind of is.... Personal lawyer to the President is selling access, pay for play... This is red handed...

Trump campaigned against this but he took meetings with Novartis.

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

You're right.....................lobbyists are nothing new nor are they illegal.

However...................operating as a lobbyist without being registered as one IS illegal.

He hasn't lobbied anyone at this point, moron.

They already know he was trying to sell access to Trump which is illegal. And, they are also looking into those deals to see if he actually did operate as a lobbyist or not. Either way, he was trying to get rich off of Trump's coat tails. And that at a minimum, is unethical.

He sold his advice, which is perfectly legal. Unless he was charging them specifically for speaking to Trump, he isn't lobbying.

Getting rich off the coatails of a successful politician is as common in Washington DC as lying.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Kind of is.... Personal lawyer to the President is selling access, pay for play... This is red handed...

Trump campaigned against this but he took meetings with Novartis.

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

You're right.....................lobbyists are nothing new nor are they illegal.

However...................operating as a lobbyist without being registered as one IS illegal.

He hasn't lobbied anyone at this point, moron.

They already know he was trying to sell access to Trump which is illegal. And, they are also looking into those deals to see if he actually did operate as a lobbyist or not. Either way, he was trying to get rich off of Trump's coat tails. And that at a minimum, is unethical.

He sold his advice, which is perfectly legal. Unless he was charging them specifically for speaking to Trump, he isn't lobbying.

Getting rich off the coatails of a successful politician is as common in Washington DC as lying.

Actually, he told AT and T that he could influence Trump to get their merger with Time-Warner approved. That is lobbying.

 

[bripat9643]

No, actually it isn't.

Lobbyists are nothing new - nor is it illegal.

This is just you Stalinists clutching your pearls and feigning outrage.

You're right.....................lobbyists are nothing new nor are they illegal.

However...................operating as a lobbyist without being registered as one IS illegal.

He hasn't lobbied anyone at this point, moron.

They already know he was trying to sell access to Trump which is illegal. And, they are also looking into those deals to see if he actually did operate as a lobbyist or not. Either way, he was trying to get rich off of Trump's coat tails. And that at a minimum, is unethical.

He sold his advice, which is perfectly legal. Unless he was charging them specifically for speaking to Trump, he isn't lobbying.

Getting rich off the coatails of a successful politician is as common in Washington DC as lying.

Actually, he told AT and T that he could influence Trump to get their merger with Time-Warner approved. That is lobbying.

It doesn't matter what he told them. Until he actually does it, he isn't lobbying.