He started his speech by relating the uniformity between Republicans and Democrats when asked what most concerned them in their spirituality. And that this informed his comments prepared for the National Prayer Breakfast. And you have a problem with this, how?
Close...
He actually started his speech by reading four (4) texts of Scripture.
Proverbs 11:9 (New International Version) said:
With their mouths the godless destroy their neighbors, but through knowledge the righteous escape.
Source: Proverbs - Purpose and Theme - The proverbs of - Bible Gateway
His message here is to communicate that words have meaning and words have power. The power to destroy others with negative words. Either by offense, lies, slander or the like.
Source: Proverbs - Purpose and Theme - The proverbs of - Bible Gateway
He further expounds on the concept of words having the ability to destroy people by citing the text of Scripture that states that those who engage in that are not wise. Hence, only fools and ignoramuses seek to demean and deride and offend others for the sake of offending.
Proverbs 11:25 (New International Version) said:
A generous person will prosper; whoever refreshes others will be refreshed.
Source: Proverbs - Purpose and Theme - The proverbs of - Bible Gateway
He continues with a text of Scripture that states the importance of being genereous and the blessings of being generous. That is, of course, sharing your wealth.
2 Chronicles 7:14 (New International Version) said:
if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Source: 2 - - Bible Gateway
His final choice of Scripture covers Christians and how they should act. Note "my people, who are called by my name" meaning not heathens or athiests, but self-proclaimed Christians. If you call yourself a Christian...act like one. Which ties back into his 3 previous text he cited on how to act.
Then he specifically went on that it was NOT his intention to offend anyone, and went on to expound on that.
The point is, he's not saying things for the purpose of offending others...that's the message. It was after all this that he began his speech.
Now let's look at the RW response. NOTHING of what I just covered is mentioned. What did they latch on to instead? Oh how Dr. Carson embarrassed the President and spoke out against his policies. Which was EXACTLY the opposite of Dr. Carson's intent.
You guys seem to be very skillful at missing and misconstruing glaringly obvious messages and extracting what YOU want from it.
Carry on.