You should ask that to the retard who started this thread and the idiots who agree with him.
I base it on the FACT that eye-witnesses report the shooter demanded his victims identify their religion, that those who refused to answer were shot in the leg / body, and that those who identified themselves as Christians were shot in the head.
I guess I could choose to believe YOU, who was NOT there and who obviously haven't seen the MANY reports of this coming out, but I would rather trust the eye-witnesses, the police who have taken their statements, and the reporters who have been covering this story. I will agree with you that the investigation is on-going and I do not doubt that more will be reported. If these statements / reports are found to be un-true at a later time, then so be it. The initial reports, however, are disturbing...to most normal people.
I also base this post on several news stories who have chosen to 'cherry-pick' (it SEEMS) the words 'on-line religion' and 'organized religion' from pieces of things/reports they have found to report this story while seemingly ignoring the eye-witness accounts of the shooter specifically targeting Christians.
Much like Obama, without having hardly ANY information you are willing to personally attack and insult people as part of your own agenda or to support your own personal bias / beliefs. Good luck with that. Seems like we will just have to agree to disagree....God bless, and have a great day!