The difference being the aggressor. I have no problem with this guy kicking idiots off his property. They do not have the right to be there. I have a problem with a driver aggressively driving into a crowd. That is threatening.
Those protesters should have been removed so the ICE worker could enter his place of work HOWEVER the driver does not have the power to remove them. They were not on HIS property. That was the job of the local police. If they refused to clear the way then they should have been arrested. After the fact they should have been arrested for mobbing the truck and jumping all over it.
That does not remove the responsibility of the ICE worker over his own actions that were clearly threatening and purposefully endangered people around him. That was not within his rights and by far the most egregious thing that occurred in this specific instance.
We are letting the criminals define the game and control the society.
The criminals were not on THEIR PROPERTY.
Why do they get to do whatever the **** they want, and only when someone fights back, does the law get involved?
WHAT THE ****?
AND, the "protestors" cause the issue, they provoke the violence, then they pretend to be innocent victims, while they purposefully provoked it.
You've seen it. Massively provocative behavior, and then "hands up don't shot".
Why are we playing along with this bullshit?