Donald trump's first law: There is no law.

Judge Trump, not Biden.

That's what Defense, FBI, and Homeland are doing in refusing to have their workers write a review of what they did last week.
They can’t write a review of what they did last week? Seems odd. My two kids could tell me what they did last week
 
the constitutional order of the United States of America, which was built upon a complicated set of interlocking principles that it only imperfectly upholds or, in many cases, does not uphold at all.

^^^


So the article is blaming the constitution itself ,and not those who seek to execute (EO's) it's provisions?

EO's are nothing new , the fact is almost every POTUS has forwarded some, but we never heard that it was 'unconstitutional' before Trump

This is because Congress (who are yelling the loudest) are left out of the EO loop ,and will be investigated

Congress......... you know that place where one can become a millionaire faster than any other place in America.........~S~
 

This is an incredible read. Yes, trump thinks he is a law unto himself. As the article states, many, if not all, of his 70 or so EOs are unconstitutional. But the MAGA majority congress is rolling over and giving him an authority that the US Constitution specifically gives to Congress. I don't think the Dems, at this point, have the fortitude or even the will to step up to trump's unconstitutional power grab. Until repubs in congress begin to realize that trump's greed is very well gong to cost them their seats, no one is going to say, "STOP!"

Every executive order he signs references the laws he is enforcing.

thread fail.
 
Judge Trump, not Biden.

That's what Defense, FBI, and Homeland are doing in refusing to have their workers write a review of what they did last week.
Musk is going mad. And the Moron enabling him loves it.
 
The idea that that orange bag of shit is saving the country is the funniest thing that I've heard lately.
 
They can’t write a review of what they did last week? Seems odd. My two kids could tell me what they did last week
its-just-5-bullet-points-v0-sxw523q1zble1.png
 
Are Democrats too stupid to recognize the difference between a judge stopping something with a preliminary injunction, and making a decision on the merits?

There are even cases here where the precedents point one way, and even a law, but the Constitutional question remains. The law that says the President cannot "impound" funds is Constitutional bullshit. Thomas ******* Jefferson did it. To say that the President is compelled to spend money foolishly is simply stupid.

Give it a few months for these matters to play out.

Trump will win on all counts.
 
Are Democrats too stupid to recognize the difference between a judge stopping something with a preliminary injunction, and making a decision on the merits?

There are even cases here where the precedents point one way, and even a law, but the Constitutional question remains. The law that says the President cannot "impound" funds is Constitutional bullshit. Thomas ******* Jefferson did it. To say that the President is compelled to spend money foolishly is simply stupid.

Give it a few months for these matters to play out.

Trump will win on all counts.
Not a chance, because Congress and SCOTUS together will prevent it. Tough.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom