Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What an ASTOUNDINGLY ignorant thing to say! Simply mind boggling that anyone would say something that stupid!The Klan was not a religious organization.
It was an organization that operated in a very religious country, and thus sometimes used religious trappings or tried to co-opt religious organizations or events to spread it's message.
Madonna always held a prayer circle before her concerts. She would tell you she is religious. Just like the Klan will. Just like ISIS will.What an ASTOUNDINGLY ignorant thing to say! Simply mind boggling that anyone would say something that stupid!The Klan was not a religious organization.
I addressed that in the part of my post you dishonestly and cowardly cut.
Hey, check this out,
Look a crucifix! SHe must be religious!
I guess you've never heard of the Christian terrorists' RAHOWA.If you can't tell the difference between that and Holy War, this is an issue with your brain not working well, nothing that I can do for you.
It was an organization that operated in a very religious country, and thus sometimes used religious trappings or tried to co-opt religious organizations or events to spread it's message.
Are we talking about the Christian terrorists or the Muslim terrorists here?
Same. Same, same, same, same, same.
Madonna always held a prayer circle before her concerts. She would tell you she is religious. Just like the Klan will. Just like ISIS will.What an ASTOUNDINGLY ignorant thing to say! Simply mind boggling that anyone would say something that stupid!The Klan was not a religious organization.
I addressed that in the part of my post you dishonestly and cowardly cut.
Hey, check this out,
Look a crucifix! SHe must be religious!
Christian terrorists. Muslims terrorists.
Same. Same, same, same, same, same.
That is correct but it is not "radical liberals" alone. It is anyone who actually understands the Constitution. It is religious freedom that must be protected, not any individual religionYou are living in the past.
Oh, lookee here!
In a topic called: GOP House Majority Whip Steve Scalise Spoke At White Supremacist Conference
You people backed Robert Byrd. Stop your shit.
How long ago was Byrd in the Klan?
I'll tell you.
70 YEARS AGO!
You are a fucking hypocrite.
That is a weak connection you made. Scalise speaks at a conference where he may or may not have known of any ties to white supremacy. Contrast that with Byrd who was a fucking KKK leader. Further, what's the difference speaking at a white supremacist conference or a new black panther conference?
You got it half right. The Constitution states that :Trump should read our actual constitution, the one that bans the government from promoting Christianity or any other faith for that matter.
Free yourself from the illusion that our Constitution bans faith in government. It does not. What the Constitution does do is prevent governmental intrusion into religion. Not only did gov. allow it. They relied on it.
Prayer then:
And now:
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion......"
That means, whether you like it or not that the government may neither interfere with the practice of religion OR favor one religion over another. It's only logical that once the government does show favoritism to one religion, it will detract from the status and legitimacy of others. In addition, it is well establish in Constitutional law that the government may not establish a state sponsored religion which is what Trump and his moronic minions would like to do.
The religion that was established by Christians (not by gov.) in the US is Christianity. There is no law against gov officials having a religion.
By the same token, there is no Gov. law insisting that Americans adopt Christianity Our government has never decreed that Christianity or any other religion shall be the National religion.
I got it all right, and Trump did not say he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion. He said he would protect the rights of the religious.
To the radical Liberals, any nod or protection towards Christianity is considered a step towards a national religion; or, quite simply, they hate Christians.
I guess you've never heard of the Christian terrorists' RAHOWA.If you can't tell the difference between that and Holy War, this is an issue with your brain not working well, nothing that I can do for you.
Same. Same, same, same, same, same.
It is if there is a specific intent to protect one religion and not others.You got it half right. The Constitution states that :Trump should read our actual constitution, the one that bans the government from promoting Christianity or any other faith for that matter.
Free yourself from the illusion that our Constitution bans faith in government. It does not. What the Constitution does do is prevent governmental intrusion into religion. Not only did gov. allow it. They relied on it.
Prayer then:
And now:
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion......"
That means, whether you like it or not that the government may neither interfere with the practice of religion OR favor one religion over another. It's only logical that once the government does show favoritism to one religion, it will detract from the status and legitimacy of others. In addition, it is well establish in Constitutional law that the government may not establish a state sponsored religion which is what Trump and his moronic minions would like to do.
The religion that was established by Christians (not by gov.) in the US is Christianity. There is no law against gov officials having a religion.
By the same token, there is no Gov. law insisting that Americans adopt Christianity Our government has never decreed that Christianity or any other religion shall be the National religion.
I got it all right, and Trump did not say he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion. He said he would protect the rights of the religious.
Just a few points:
1. No one said that there is a law against government officials having a religion. That is just a red herring.
2. Christians brought Christianity to the colonies for Christians. They may have wanted it to be a Christian nation but that didn't happen as it was never adopted by government, as you know.
3. With all of the vastly different factions of Christianity, to say that this is a "Christian nation" is meaningless.
4. Trump is not quite stupid enough to say that "he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion" but he has indicated that he would bestow favoritism on Christians and he is in bed with those who do see Christianity and the bible as superior to the Constitution.
Donald Trump To Address Extremist Anti-LGBT Summit In Orlando
Protecting is not the same as favoritism.
That is correct but it is not "radical liberals" alone. It is anyone who actually understands the Constitution. It is religious freedom that must be protected, not any individual religionYou are living in the past.
Oh, lookee here!
In a topic called: GOP House Majority Whip Steve Scalise Spoke At White Supremacist Conference
You people backed Robert Byrd. Stop your shit.
How long ago was Byrd in the Klan?
I'll tell you.
70 YEARS AGO!
You are a fucking hypocrite.
That is a weak connection you made. Scalise speaks at a conference where he may or may not have known of any ties to white supremacy. Contrast that with Byrd who was a fucking KKK leader. Further, what's the difference speaking at a white supremacist conference or a new black panther conference?
You got it half right. The Constitution states that :Trump should read our actual constitution, the one that bans the government from promoting Christianity or any other faith for that matter.
Free yourself from the illusion that our Constitution bans faith in government. It does not. What the Constitution does do is prevent governmental intrusion into religion. Not only did gov. allow it. They relied on it.
Prayer then:
And now:
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion......"
That means, whether you like it or not that the government may neither interfere with the practice of religion OR favor one religion over another. It's only logical that once the government does show favoritism to one religion, it will detract from the status and legitimacy of others. In addition, it is well establish in Constitutional law that the government may not establish a state sponsored religion which is what Trump and his moronic minions would like to do.
The religion that was established by Christians (not by gov.) in the US is Christianity. There is no law against gov officials having a religion.
By the same token, there is no Gov. law insisting that Americans adopt Christianity Our government has never decreed that Christianity or any other religion shall be the National religion.
I got it all right, and Trump did not say he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion. He said he would protect the rights of the religious.
To the radical Liberals, any nod or protection towards Christianity is considered a step towards a national religion; or, quite simply, they hate Christians.
You've been lied to by your propaganda sites, which are leeching right wing extremist teachings into the mainstream. Nazism.It was an organization that operated in a very religious country, and thus sometimes used religious trappings or tried to co-opt religious organizations or events to spread it's message.
Are we talking about the Christian terrorists or the Muslim terrorists here?
Same. Same, same, same, same, same.
Are you trying to lie to me, or just to yourself?
It is if there is a specific intent to protect one religion and not others.You got it half right. The Constitution states that :Free yourself from the illusion that our Constitution bans faith in government. It does not. What the Constitution does do is prevent governmental intrusion into religion. Not only did gov. allow it. They relied on it.
Prayer then:
And now:
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion......"
That means, whether you like it or not that the government may neither interfere with the practice of religion OR favor one religion over another. It's only logical that once the government does show favoritism to one religion, it will detract from the status and legitimacy of others. In addition, it is well establish in Constitutional law that the government may not establish a state sponsored religion which is what Trump and his moronic minions would like to do.
The religion that was established by Christians (not by gov.) in the US is Christianity. There is no law against gov officials having a religion.
By the same token, there is no Gov. law insisting that Americans adopt Christianity Our government has never decreed that Christianity or any other religion shall be the National religion.
I got it all right, and Trump did not say he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion. He said he would protect the rights of the religious.
Just a few points:
1. No one said that there is a law against government officials having a religion. That is just a red herring.
2. Christians brought Christianity to the colonies for Christians. They may have wanted it to be a Christian nation but that didn't happen as it was never adopted by government, as you know.
3. With all of the vastly different factions of Christianity, to say that this is a "Christian nation" is meaningless.
4. Trump is not quite stupid enough to say that "he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion" but he has indicated that he would bestow favoritism on Christians and he is in bed with those who do see Christianity and the bible as superior to the Constitution.
Donald Trump To Address Extremist Anti-LGBT Summit In Orlando
Protecting is not the same as favoritism.
Islam is under attack by Trump and you bigots.It is if there is a specific intent to protect one religion and not others.You got it half right. The Constitution states that :
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion......"
That means, whether you like it or not that the government may neither interfere with the practice of religion OR favor one religion over another. It's only logical that once the government does show favoritism to one religion, it will detract from the status and legitimacy of others. In addition, it is well establish in Constitutional law that the government may not establish a state sponsored religion which is what Trump and his moronic minions would like to do.
The religion that was established by Christians (not by gov.) in the US is Christianity. There is no law against gov officials having a religion.
By the same token, there is no Gov. law insisting that Americans adopt Christianity Our government has never decreed that Christianity or any other religion shall be the National religion.
I got it all right, and Trump did not say he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion. He said he would protect the rights of the religious.
Just a few points:
1. No one said that there is a law against government officials having a religion. That is just a red herring.
2. Christians brought Christianity to the colonies for Christians. They may have wanted it to be a Christian nation but that didn't happen as it was never adopted by government, as you know.
3. With all of the vastly different factions of Christianity, to say that this is a "Christian nation" is meaningless.
4. Trump is not quite stupid enough to say that "he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion" but he has indicated that he would bestow favoritism on Christians and he is in bed with those who do see Christianity and the bible as superior to the Constitution.
Donald Trump To Address Extremist Anti-LGBT Summit In Orlando
Protecting is not the same as favoritism.
Other religions are not under attack by you anti-Christians.
That is correct but it is not "radical liberals" alone. It is anyone who actually understands the Constitution. It is religious freedom that must be protected, not any individual religionYou are living in the past.
Oh, lookee here!
In a topic called: GOP House Majority Whip Steve Scalise Spoke At White Supremacist Conference
You people backed Robert Byrd. Stop your shit.
How long ago was Byrd in the Klan?
I'll tell you.
70 YEARS AGO!
You are a fucking hypocrite.
That is a weak connection you made. Scalise speaks at a conference where he may or may not have known of any ties to white supremacy. Contrast that with Byrd who was a fucking KKK leader. Further, what's the difference speaking at a white supremacist conference or a new black panther conference?
You got it half right. The Constitution states that :Free yourself from the illusion that our Constitution bans faith in government. It does not. What the Constitution does do is prevent governmental intrusion into religion. Not only did gov. allow it. They relied on it.
Prayer then:
And now:
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion......"
That means, whether you like it or not that the government may neither interfere with the practice of religion OR favor one religion over another. It's only logical that once the government does show favoritism to one religion, it will detract from the status and legitimacy of others. In addition, it is well establish in Constitutional law that the government may not establish a state sponsored religion which is what Trump and his moronic minions would like to do.
The religion that was established by Christians (not by gov.) in the US is Christianity. There is no law against gov officials having a religion.
By the same token, there is no Gov. law insisting that Americans adopt Christianity Our government has never decreed that Christianity or any other religion shall be the National religion.
I got it all right, and Trump did not say he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion. He said he would protect the rights of the religious.
To the radical Liberals, any nod or protection towards Christianity is considered a step towards a national religion; or, quite simply, they hate Christians.
NOpe. Protecting the free exercise of Christianity is not a step toward a national religion.
That is a lie told by anti-Christians to rationalize their attempts of discrimination.
2. Christians brought Christianity to the colonies for Christians. They may have wanted it to be a Christian nation but that didn't happen as it was never adopted by government, as you know.
You've been lied to by your propaganda sites, which are leeching right wing extremist teachings into the mainstream. Nazism.It was an organization that operated in a very religious country, and thus sometimes used religious trappings or tried to co-opt religious organizations or events to spread it's message.
Are we talking about the Christian terrorists or the Muslim terrorists here?
Same. Same, same, same, same, same.
Are you trying to lie to me, or just to yourself?
You've been taught "KKK" was a subset of "Democrats". A lie. A lie I have exploded with facts. Facts from which you have been kept totally in the dark. Your ignorance is a critical element of the success of the liars and bigots who fill your head with poison and lies.
You have been taught to be a hypocrite who demands the term "Muslim terrorists" ALWAYS be used in the context of the extremists of that faith, but to NEVER think of the Klan as Christian terrorists. This truth never even occurred to you. That's how brainwashed you are.
You've been taught Islam is a religion of violence, while again being kept in the dark about the massive stains on Christianity.
If Islam is a religion of violence, then so is Christianity. When you are informed of ALL human history, then Islam and Christianity are either BOTH religions of violence, or NEITHER of them are.
I come down on the side of NEITHER.
Humans are violent, not religion.
You want to call the extremists of Islam "Muslim terrorists"? Fine. I have no problem with that. But don't let me catch you being a hypocrite and refusing to acknowledge the Klan are Christian terrorists.
Islam is under attack by Trump and you bigots.It is if there is a specific intent to protect one religion and not others.The religion that was established by Christians (not by gov.) in the US is Christianity. There is no law against gov officials having a religion.
By the same token, there is no Gov. law insisting that Americans adopt Christianity Our government has never decreed that Christianity or any other religion shall be the National religion.
I got it all right, and Trump did not say he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion. He said he would protect the rights of the religious.
Just a few points:
1. No one said that there is a law against government officials having a religion. That is just a red herring.
2. Christians brought Christianity to the colonies for Christians. They may have wanted it to be a Christian nation but that didn't happen as it was never adopted by government, as you know.
3. With all of the vastly different factions of Christianity, to say that this is a "Christian nation" is meaningless.
4. Trump is not quite stupid enough to say that "he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion" but he has indicated that he would bestow favoritism on Christians and he is in bed with those who do see Christianity and the bible as superior to the Constitution.
Donald Trump To Address Extremist Anti-LGBT Summit In Orlando
Protecting is not the same as favoritism.
Other religions are not under attack by you anti-Christians.
That is correct but it is not "radical liberals" alone. It is anyone who actually understands the Constitution. It is religious freedom that must be protected, not any individual religionYou are living in the past.
Oh, lookee here!
In a topic called: GOP House Majority Whip Steve Scalise Spoke At White Supremacist Conference
You people backed Robert Byrd. Stop your shit.
How long ago was Byrd in the Klan?
I'll tell you.
70 YEARS AGO!
You are a fucking hypocrite.
That is a weak connection you made. Scalise speaks at a conference where he may or may not have known of any ties to white supremacy. Contrast that with Byrd who was a fucking KKK leader. Further, what's the difference speaking at a white supremacist conference or a new black panther conference?
You got it half right. The Constitution states that :
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion......"
That means, whether you like it or not that the government may neither interfere with the practice of religion OR favor one religion over another. It's only logical that once the government does show favoritism to one religion, it will detract from the status and legitimacy of others. In addition, it is well establish in Constitutional law that the government may not establish a state sponsored religion which is what Trump and his moronic minions would like to do.
The religion that was established by Christians (not by gov.) in the US is Christianity. There is no law against gov officials having a religion.
By the same token, there is no Gov. law insisting that Americans adopt Christianity Our government has never decreed that Christianity or any other religion shall be the National religion.
I got it all right, and Trump did not say he was going to crown Christianity as the Nation's religion. He said he would protect the rights of the religious.
To the radical Liberals, any nod or protection towards Christianity is considered a step towards a national religion; or, quite simply, they hate Christians.
NOpe. Protecting the free exercise of Christianity is not a step toward a national religion.
That is a lie told by anti-Christians to rationalize their attempts of discrimination.
Bulshit! Paranoid bullshit at that!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk