Lord-Humungus
Diamond Member
- Aug 29, 2023
- 4,240
- 3,906
- 1,918
That is for the jury to decide.So stormy Daniels is in off and on liar who should be trusted?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is for the jury to decide.So stormy Daniels is in off and on liar who should be trusted?
That is for the jury to decide.
What would convince you the trial is fair?Same with Trump, however, I don't have any high hopes that it's going to be a fair trial.
Yet they only really started cracking down on him directly afterward that he said that he was going to run. Why not directly after he left the white house?
What would convince you the trial is fair?
You want to lick Bidens balls, don't you?Nope. That's Trump's fault. All the delays and attempts to push the trials out. The only reason he's running is in the vain hope he wins and will avoid spending the rest of his life in prison.
The trial taking place anywhere but a state run by a bunch of bias libtards.
Just to make sure I am understanding you correctly. No matter what evidence is presented you will not accept a verdict as legitimate because it is happening in a place you don’t like?
So if he is found not guilty you will be on of the first to say it wasn’t a fair trial?First of all what evidence and second of all duh!! Even if they have so called evidence you can bet that both the jury and the judge will be liberals and will all be very one-sided where they can easily make things up about him just because they don't like him.
So if he is found not guilty you will be on of the first to say it wasn’t a fair trial?
So you don't want a fair trial. At least you admit it, finally.If he is found not guilty then I'll take it all back.
So you don't want a fair trial. At least you admit it, finally.
So if he is found not guilty you will be on of the first to say it wasn’t a fair trial?
If he is found not guilty then I'll take it all back.
That’s a dangerous attitude to have.If he is found not guilty then I'll take it all back.
How you haven’t seen any evidence because it hasn’t been presented yet.He was specifically asking me about a not guilty verdict. A guilty verdict I wouldn't throw out for credible evidence but I'm pretty sure that they don't have any.
you haven’t seen any evidence because it hasn’t been presented yet.
I did and it is a dangerous position to take. trump is Not Guilty because that is the default position but if there is evidence presented you can’t just ignore because you find it inconvenient.Read post #51.
Them how do you its credibility. You seem to have already made your mind up they dont have credibility evidence without seeing itDuh!
Them how do you its credibility. You seem to have already made your mind up they dont have credibility evidence without seeing it
Sounds like you've already done that....and other guy's too.You want to lick Bidens balls, don't you?