Donald Trump Scores Two Major Victories In Court

[colfax_m]

Hillary destroyed evidence. She bleach bitted her hard drive which she wasn't supposed to be keeping government information on. She destroyed three government cell phones. She transferred classified government information to her aids laptop which her husband used to send nude pictures of himself to strange women all over the country. When Comey got a search warrant and found that computer, he confiscated and destroyed it.

Trump got impeached because he asked a leader from another country for a favor.

I guess the "innocent until found guilty" doesn't apply to people like Clinton. You have some serious double standards (and a poor grasp on facts).

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I guess you think typing out few paragraphs of monkey piss makes you some kind of political expert, what a joke.

Have you ever been in a Communist Country?

Have you ever met someone that is actually a Communist?

You don't have a clue as to what a Communist is and your dumbass posts prove it.

Stop listening to Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and all of the other right wing morons who are leading you off of a cliff.

Right, because Superbadbreath knows more than all of them, don't you?

Speaking of evil right-wing talk show hosts, Mark Levin had a show on this subject. He read the top ten goals of the Communist party to takeover this country. He then read the actions of the Democrat party today. Would you like a link to that episode? After all, he couldn't lie about it because the Communist Manifesto is available on the internet so you can see what he's talking about is 100% truth. Let me know, I have the link if you want to spend ten minutes of your time if you actually want to learn something in your life.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I guess the "innocent until found guilty" doesn't apply to people like Clinton. You have some serious double standards (and a poor grasp on facts).

And that's the problem with our government, the Democrats have two standards. Do you mean to tell me that if Don Jr. was selling his paint by numbers works of art to anonymous buyers from 75K to a half-million dollars that the Democrats would have let that slide? Not in your life. They would be having congressional hearings, FBI investigations, likely another phony impeachment on Trump and so on. Or if Trump got his brother a job in a construction company with no experience, and then that same company got a billion dollar contract from the government to build houses in Iraq that Nancy wouldn't be up in arms?

But this all happened with Biden, and nothing.

 

[colfax_m]

And that's the problem with our government, the Democrats have two standards. Do you mean to tell me that if Don Jr. was selling his paint by numbers works of art to anonymous buyers from 75K to a half-million dollars that the Democrats would have let that slide? Not in your life. They would be having congressional hearings, FBI investigations, likely another phony impeachment on Trump and so on. Or if Trump got his brother a job in a construction company with no experience, and then that same company got a billion dollar contract from the government to build houses in Iraq that Nancy wouldn't be up in arms?

But this all happened with Biden, and nothing.

You have two standards, but complain about the Democrats "two standards"? Please. We had zero insight into the business activities of Trump given he didn't ever publish his taxes. Don't pretend like the lack of transparency is all of a sudden a problem for you. Not unless you're willing to admit you're a hypcorit.

I wasn't aware it was illegal to sell paintings.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You have two standards, but complain about the Democrats "two standards"? Please. We had zero insight into the business activities of Trump given he didn't ever publish his taxes. Don't pretend like the lack of transparency is all of a sudden a problem for you. Not unless you're willing to admit you're a hypcorit.

I wasn't aware it was illegal to sell paintings.

It isn't, but highly suspected the people buying them are buying access to his father. For all we know they could be Iranians or Chinese. We'll never know because they are hiding the names of t he buyers.

What two standards do I have? There is no requirement of a President publicizing his tax records. People like Trump are constantly audited by the IRS. If he was doing anything illegal, he would have been caught long before taking the presidency.

 

[struth]

So many things wrong in one post, it's incredible.
1. Trump's accusers haven't reached court by and large.
2. As far as I'm aware the E. Jean Carroll case (which is about defamation) is still ongoing. Not dismissed with prejudice.
3. There's nothing odd about what Mueller did. He was not allowed to press charges.
4. Failure to press charges is now "exoneration"? Does that apply to everyone?
5. Mueller was clear in his report that he made no determination of the illegality of his actions.

1) read the OP.
2) isn’t that the lady that claimed to anderson cooper that rape was sexy?
3) Mueller cleared trump of the russian hoax and, in an odd move (compared to prior special prosecutors and what was expected) didn’t make any recommendation on the obstruction…which the House exonerated him of by not impeaching
4) yes not brining charges after a investigation is exoneration


sorry you lost, lost again

 

[colfax_m]

It isn't, but highly suspected the people buying them are buying access to his father. For all we know they could be Iranians or Chinese. We'll never know because they are hiding the names of t he buyers.

What two standards do I have? There is no requirement of a President publicizing his tax records. People like Trump are constantly audited by the IRS. If he was doing anything illegal, he would have been caught long before taking the presidency.

What evidence exists that Hunter Biden is doing anything illegal with his art deals?

 

[colfax_m]

1) read the OP.
2) isn’t that the lady that claimed to anderson cooper that rape was sexy?
3) Mueller cleared trump of the russian hoax and, in an odd move (compared to prior special prosecutors and what was expected) didn’t make any recommendation on the obstruction…which the House exonerated him of by not impeaching
4) yes not brining charges after a investigation is exoneration


sorry you lost, lost again

1. The OP says nothing about Trump being exonerated, she dropped the case.
2. Yes, it is. Still in progress.
3. It's not an odd move. Mueller didn't operate under the law that Starr did. Mueller's office was part of the DoJ and bound to their policy, which is that they can't indict the sitting president. So to be clear, not charging someone is exoneration.
4. So Hillary Clinton was exonerated.

 

[struth]

1. The OP says nothing about Trump being exonerated, she dropped the case.
2. Yes, it is. Still in progress.
3. It's not an odd move. Mueller didn't operate under the law that Starr did. Mueller's office was part of the DoJ and bound to their policy, which is that they can't indict the sitting president. So to be clear, not charging someone is exoneration.
4. So Hillary Clinton was exonerated.

1) the OP says the Judge dismissed the case WITH PREJUDICE.
2) hahahhahah yeah good luck with that nut job
3) Yes it was a very odd move, but regardless....the exoneration took place in the House. Sure they were bound by the policy, but they were expected to reach a conclusion, to recommend indictment or not...Starr couldn't of indicted Clinton either, but he made the recommendations for indictments.

The exoneration took place, because 1) Mueller concluded that the Russian conspiracy theory was a hoax, and thus no bases to indict 2) didn't conclude on the obstruction, left it to the House, and Shifty didn't impeach. Exoneration. Case closed. Yet you dembot cultist are still ignoring the reality
4) Yes, Sec Clinton was exonerationed of the illegal activiites of her law firm

 

[Slade3200]

We're cheering that another gold diggin whore got shot down. To me, this ain't a republican or democrat thing. It's a gold diggin whore thing. Like Bill Burr says, "gold digging whores" are the female version of wife beaters.
These women are the reason why so many guys like myself, are leery of approaching a woman. God forbid you give them a hug, or a kiss on the cheek. That's "sexual harassment" now a days. How sick is that? Kissing a woman is sexual harassment... That's just stupid.
Gold diggin whores and the left will call that rape. It don't get any dumber.

There has also been generations of legit sexual harassment and discrimination that has just been ignored. My heart doesn’t bleed for you if you now feel uncomfortable when touching women

 

[colfax_m]

1) the OP says the Judge dismissed the case WITH PREJUDICE.
2) hahahhahah yeah good luck with that nut job
3) Yes it was a very odd move, but regardless....the exoneration took place in the House. Sure they were bound by the policy, but they were expected to reach a conclusion, to recommend indictment or not...Starr couldn't of indicted Clinton either, but he made the recommendations for indictments.

The exoneration took place, because 1) Mueller concluded that the Russian conspiracy theory was a hoax, and thus no bases to indict 2) didn't conclude on the obstruction, left it to the House, and Shifty didn't impeach. Exoneration. Case closed. Yet you dembot cultist are still ignoring the reality
4) Yes, Sec Clinton was exonerationed of the illegal activiites of her law firm

1. The plantiff moved for dismissal. WITH PREJUDICE is not exoneration. Besides, the allegation wasn't even over the accusation, it was over defamation about the accusation.
2. So you're also engaging in attacking the victims. Speaks about as much of your character as it does about Clinton's.
3. Not odd when you understand that Mueller was part of the DoJ and Starr was not. They operated under different policies.
4. Clinton was also exonerated of illegal activities as SoS.

 

[YoursTruly]

There has also been generations of legit sexual harassment and discrimination that has just been ignored. My heart doesn’t bleed for you if you now feel uncomfortable when touching women

Yeah, and those people need to be thrown under the jail. No one is going to take up for someone who actually sexually assaults anyone else. Especially rape.
But the stupid left has taken his "sexual assault" to their own extreme levels. So far that basic human nature is now defined by some stupid lefty rulebook, that NO decent man has access to.
He makes a play for a woman, and next thing he knows he's being sue for some BS he didn't even do. Or was innocent of the severity in which she describes.
Like Al Franken. I didn't like him. But what he did wasn't sexual assault. It was a ******* joke.
Monica Lewinski was a gold diggin whore.
The porn star who sued Trump, was a gold diggin whore.

When are you lefties going to understand that there are gold digging whores in this country, that need to be taken out.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

What evidence exists that Hunter Biden is doing anything illegal with his art deals?

That's the point. Criminals hide evidence and their criminal friends in Congress will keep it that way. I hope when we takeover the Congress in 22 they do look into it. I hope they look into what the FBI did with his laptop that according to the repair shop owner, had him having sex with children. I hope they pressure the ATF to arrest him for lying on a federal firearms application and buying a gun with it.

 

[colfax_m]

That's the point. Criminals hide evidence and their criminal friends in Congress will keep it that way. I hope when we takeover the Congress in 22 they do look into it. I hope they look into what the FBI did with his laptop that according to the repair shop owner, had him having sex with children. I hope they pressure the ATF to arrest him for lying on a federal firearms application and buying a gun with it.

So we need to investigate something with zero evidence because you know they’re criminals because criminals have zero evidence. Boy. You never heard of the 4th amendment have you?

If something had been illegal, he’d have been charged long ago. Congress is not a law enforcement agency. They have no business here.

 

[YoursTruly]

That's the point. Criminals hide evidence and their criminal friends in Congress will keep it that way. I hope when we takeover the Congress in 22 they do look into it. I hope they look into what the FBI did with his laptop that according to the repair shop owner, had him having sex with children. I hope they pressure the ATF to arrest him for lying on a federal firearms application and buying a gun with it.

If you're hoping the GOP is going to be much different, I hope you're not holding your breath. Democrats suck to high heaven. But the GOP isn't really any better.

Example: Remember when Trump said he was going to "Lock her up?" Yeah, the day after the election, he changed his mind.

 

[Slade3200]

Yeah, and those people need to be thrown under the jail. No one is going to take up for someone who actually sexually assaults anyone else. Especially rape.
But the stupid left has taken his "sexual assault" to their own extreme levels. So far that basic human nature is now defined by some stupid lefty rulebook, that NO decent man has access to.
He makes a play for a woman, and next thing he knows he's being sue for some BS he didn't even do. Or was innocent of the severity in which she describes.
Like Al Franken. I didn't like him. But what he did wasn't sexual assault. It was a ******* joke.
Monica Lewinski was a gold diggin whore.
The porn star who sued Trump, was a gold diggin whore.

When are you lefties going to understand that there are gold digging whores in this country, that need to be taken out.

Well unfortunately most cases don’t result in the offenders getting thrown under the jail… they just get away with it and it becomes normalized as part of the work environment. It operated that way for decades. You may think that #me too is too extreme on the other side but so ******* what?! There is often an extreme pushback to get real change made and then the situation balances. I’d rather it be a little too extreme on the side of change over keeping the oppressive status quo of the past.

 

[YoursTruly]

Well unfortunately most cases don’t result in the offenders getting thrown under the jail… they just get away with it and it becomes normalized as part of the work environment. It operated that way for decades. You may think that #me too is too extreme on the other side but so ******* what?! There is often an extreme pushback to get real change made and then the situation balances. I’d rather it be a little too extreme on the side of change over keeping the oppressive status quo of the past.

The vast majority of gold digging whores get off scott free also. Even moreso than men. All a woman has to do is accuse, with no evidence. If he's rich and/or famous, or even if he's not, all he has to be is accused. Then it's over. It's extremely rare for a gold diggin whore to come clean about her lies.

Hell, come to think of it, this is how a lot of black dudes got jailed in the past. Some white chick get's horny for some BBC, and gets her some. Then when it's exposed, suddenly, the whole encounter wasn't consensual. And BAM, the man is crucified.

I'm telling you, there's a lot more whores out there than men who prey on women.

Schwarzeneggers maid. Why wasn't she labeled a gold diggin whore? She knew Arnold was married, and still screwed him in his own bed. Where's her blame? Why all the blame going to Arnold? I he the ONLY one that should've known better? And why in the hell did the wife get millions in divorce settlement? She never made a movie. Never contributed much financially. She's a gold digging whore too.

 

[Lastamender]

I guess the "innocent until found guilty" doesn't apply to people like Clinton. You have some serious double standards (and a poor grasp on facts).

Are you kidding? How about Trump? He has been guilty for five ******* years. There is a double standard that allows the real criminals to walk free. Clinton destroyed evidence. That is a fact.

 

[Slade3200]

The vast majority of gold digging whores get off scott free also. Even moreso than men. All a woman has to do is accuse, with no evidence. If he's rich and/or famous, or even if he's not, all he has to be is accused. Then it's over. It's extremely rare for a gold diggin whore to come clean about her lies.

Hell, come to think of it, this is how a lot of black dudes got jailed in the past. Some white chick get's horny for some BBC, and gets her some. Then when it's exposed, suddenly, the whole encounter wasn't consensual. And BAM, the man is crucified.

I'm telling you, there's a lot more whores out there than men who prey on women.

Schwarzeneggers maid. Why wasn't she labeled a gold diggin whore? She knew Arnold was married, and still screwed him in his own bed. Where's her blame? Why all the blame going to Arnold? I he the ONLY one that should've known better? And why in the hell did the wife get millions in divorce settlement? She never made a movie. Never contributed much financially. She's a gold digging whore too.

Hahaha, “come to think of it”?! Your rants reek of ignorant assumptions and comments like that just back that up. You have no idea what the scale of assault victims vs false assault claims are but I can assure you the two don’t even compare. It’s not even close. You saying that there are more false accusations than real just shows how much of a moron you are

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Get out the crying towels. 5 years and a big 0 for the haters.

Donald Trump Scores Two Major Victories In Court, Says It Is 'Important To Fight For The Truth And Justice' After Case By Summer Zervos Is Dropped

Trump is celebrating.

conservativebrief.com

Big ******* deal, this is nothing compared to the CRIMINAL charges he is facing in connection with Jan.6 Tick tock, tick toc the wolf is at the door. My only question is who will flip on him first first, Banon or Meadows