Yes there is Juanita Broderick has 5 contemporary witnesses.
In their 2000 book
The Hunting of the President, Joe Conason and Gene Lyons note that the FBI
investigated the allegation for Kenneth Starr's Independent Counsel office, and found the evidence "inconclusive." There are no direct witnesses and no physical evidence to back up the accusation. "It’s important to note — and Broaddrick concedes — that aside from her, there are no witnesses and as far as we know, no one saw Clinton enter or leave Broaddrick’s room, or even the hotel," Myers said in the NBC broadcast. "She took no photos, kept no evidence and
the hotel has no records to confirm that she stayed there." That said, there are plenty of rapes where the victim has no physical evidence or good witnesses with which to back up their story. The lack of those categories of evidence makes the key question in the case, "Do we believe Broaddrick, or do we believe Clinton?"
The rape allegation against Bill Clinton, explained
Juanita Broaddrick gave a statement to Paula Jones Lawyer declaring Clinton had NOT RAPED her
when Paula Jones's lawyers first approached Broaddrick, she refused to cooperate, and upon being subpoenaed signed an affidavit saying,
"I do not have any information to offer regarding a nonconsensual or unwelcome sexual advance by Mr. Clinton."
Wednesday, December 23, 1998
Editor's Note: Following is the text of a Jan. 2, 1998, affidavit from the woman known as "Jane Doe No. 5." The Paula Jones legal team in a March 28 filing reported an unsubstantiated hearsay claim that, 20 years ago, Clinton had invited Jane Doe No. 5 to a hotel room and forced her to have sex. This affidavit, in which the woman denies the claim, was released by the Clinton legal team in its March 30 filing (see the Post story).
1. My name is Jane Doe #5. I am 55 years old and have been married since 1981. I have one child, age 28. I currently reside in Arkansas.
2. In November of 1997, two private investigators retained by Paula Corbin Jones approached me at my residence. I declined to speak with them, but provided the name of my family attorney. I subsequently was served with a subpoena seeking the production of documents and purporting to require my testimony at a deposition in the civil action between Paula Corbin Jones and President William Jefferson Clinton (Civil Action No. LR-C-94-290). I have never met Ms. Jones, nor do I have any information regarding the allegations that she has advanced against President Clinton. In this regard, I have no knowledge or information regarding the events she has alleged occurred on May 8, 1991 at the Excelsior Hotel or, for that matter, any knowledge or information
Washingtonpost.com Special Report: Jones vs. Clinton
Clinton Side Accuses Jones of 'Sabotage'
By Peter Baker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, March 31, 1998; Page A01
President Clinton filed court papers yesterday accusing Paula Jones's legal team of being a "stalking horse" for independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr and asked a federal judge to punish the Jones lawyers for trying to "sabotage the fairness of these proceedings" through unproven salacious charges.
Clinton complained that the Jones team had violated a court order and unfairly tarnished him by including in its own most recent court submission an unsubstantiated, third-party allegation that he once raped a woman 20 years ago, an assertion that the woman herself denied in sworn testimony unsealed yesterday. The court should find the Jones attorneys in contempt and impose unspecified penalties, the president argued