DOJ goes full partisan.

[FredVegbarfuss]

Freedom of speech means we should speak the truth where we can communicate with being on topic.

Governments become powerful enough, and then they might do anything they can. Remaining complacent would not be good. They will do so whenever not guarded from that fine? Trump will only make things worse, while some are blinded to that, so much that when everything falls apart they will still think he had nothing to do with that.

Samuel 8- God very strongly warns against mortal governments.

Matthew 6:24- "no man can serve two masters, for verily he will favor one over the other", and 1 Samuel 8 shows God warning that men will end up favoring government over Him.

Acts 5:29-32- "We ought to obey God rather than men." This is pretty clear cut.

 

[Billiejeens]

Freedom of speech means we should speak the truth where we can communicate with being on topic.

Governments become powerful enough, and then they might do anything they can. Remaining complacent would not be good. They will do so whenever not guarded from that fine? Trump will only make things worse, while some are blinded to that, so much that when everything falls apart they will still think he had nothing to do with that.

Samuel 8- God very strongly warns against mortal governments.

Matthew 6:24- "no man can serve two masters, for verily he will favor one over the other", and 1 Samuel 8 shows God warning that men will end up favoring government over Him.

Acts 5:29-32- "We ought to obey God rather than men." This is pretty clear cut.View attachment 1237131

Defending honesty is always easy.
Here goes -

It was very honest.

 

[berg80]

We told you what would happen if you guys continued your lawfare against Trump. You will now reap the whirlwind.

This is the boring phase. In 2-3 years we will have an avalanche of trials against leftwingers who abused their power.

There was no lawfare against trump. There were investigations, grand jury indictments, and trials during which Don the Orange Clown was afforded every opportunity to defend himself. One trial was even assigned to a judge he appointed, so she threw out the charges.

Conversely, trump's politicized efforts at retribution against perceived enemies have almost all resulted in embarrassing face plants. Disgracing the formerly venerable DoJ.

 

[Correll]

Defending honesty is always easy.
Here goes -

It was very honest.

Yeah, that was sort of the impression I got. A lot of lefties are really... worked themselves up terribly.

This is clearly a worst case scenario, and I freaking HOPE, it was more about underlying issues than just TDS, but, still... yeah.

 

[CowboyTed]

What's the matter Dems, don't like getting a dose of your own medicine? We're in the business of getting REVENGE on Democrats and business is a booming!

Look at the cases brought, they had evidence and were very strong cases... Trump broke the law, simple as....

Look at the Trump DOJ cases, they are getting thrown out. Why? because no law broken or very vindictive prosecution...

US legal system looks in tatters... The Rest of the world still can't figure out how Trump wasn't thrown in jail for jury tampering in the NYC case... It was simply breaking the laws speaking about a member of the Jury like that.

 

[Dragonlady]

What's the matter Dems, don't like getting a dose of your own medicine? We're in the business of getting REVENGE on Democrats and business is a booming!

Every one of Trump's imaginary cases has been tossed for a lack of evidence, or as being "malicious prosecution". If that's your idea of "business is booming", what does crashing and burning utterly and completely look like.

How many Democrats has Trump convicted? How many are being jailed? The answer would be ZERO and ZERO.

Trump tried this the last time he was in office, and the DOJ had to pay out millions of dollars to Trump's victims for violating their rights, and unjust prosecutions. Andrew McCabe now has his full pension from the FBI, and a big wrongful dismissal settlement as well.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/andrew-mccabe-former-fbi-director-pension-lawsuit-settlement-1.6211715

Wash, rinse and repeat for Lisa Page and Peter Strocz who received $2 million for First Amendment violations by Trump.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/26/peter-strzok-lawsuit-settlement-00171498

This round, James Comey, Leticia James, and Fanny Willis all seem to be in a strong position to get millions for malicious prosecution.

None of that happened when Trump went on trial. He was found GUILTY on every charge, based on the EVIDENCE, which was overwhelming.

https://www.npr.org/2024/05/30/g-s1-1848/trump-hush-money-trial-34-counts

Trump didn't even trial to defend the charges of tax and bank fraud. He just allowed the court to make summary judgement. The Appeals Court threw out the penalty imposed at trial but it did NOT reverse the verdict.



Republicans have been the ones who made allegations against Trump, and Republicans provided all of the evidence that convicted him and his cronies on every count.

American banks stopped lending to Trump in 2002. The man is, was and always shall be a criminal.

 

[struth]

Freedom of speech means we should speak the truth where we can communicate with being on topic.

Governments become powerful enough, and then they might do anything they can. Remaining complacent would not be good. They will do so whenever not guarded from that fine? Trump will only make things worse, while some are blinded to that, so much that when everything falls apart they will still think he had nothing to do with that.

Samuel 8- God very strongly warns against mortal governments.

Matthew 6:24- "no man can serve two masters, for verily he will favor one over the other", and 1 Samuel 8 shows God warning that men will end up favoring government over Him.

Acts 5:29-32- "We ought to obey God rather than men." This is pretty clear cut.View attachment 1237131

Why does anyone have to defend that post of his?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Every one of Trump's imaginary cases has been tossed for a lack of evidence, or as being "malicious prosecution". If that's your idea of "business is booming", what does crashing and burning utterly and completely look like.

How many Democrats has Trump convicted? How many are being jailed? The answer would be ZERO and ZERO.

Trump tried this the last time he was in office, and the DOJ had to pay out millions of dollars to Trump's victims for violating their rights, and unjust prosecutions. Andrew McCabe now has his full pension from the FBI, and a big wrongful dismissal settlement as well.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/andrew-mccabe-former-fbi-director-pension-lawsuit-settlement-1.6211715

Wash, rinse and repeat for Lisa Page and Peter Strocz who received $2 million for First Amendment violations by Trump.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/26/peter-strzok-lawsuit-settlement-00171498

This round, James Comey, Leticia James, and Fanny Willis all seem to be in a strong position to get millions for malicious prosecution.

None of that happened when Trump went on trial. He was found GUILTY on every charge, based on the EVIDENCE, which was overwhelming.

https://www.npr.org/2024/05/30/g-s1-1848/trump-hush-money-trial-34-counts

Trump didn't even trial to defend the charges of tax and bank fraud. He just allowed the court to make summary judgement. The Appeals Court threw out the penalty imposed at trial but it did NOT reverse the verdict.



Republicans have been the ones who made allegations against Trump, and Republicans provided all of the evidence that convicted him and his cronies on every count.

American banks stopped lending to Trump in 2002. The man is, was and always shall be a criminal.

/—-/ Bidum ordered the banks not to do business with Trump.

 

[struth]

/—-/ Bidum ordered the banks not to do business with Trump.

That was pure fascism

 

[jc456]

Freedom of speech means we should speak the truth where we can communicate with being on topic.

Governments become powerful enough, and then they might do anything they can. Remaining complacent would not be good. They will do so whenever not guarded from that fine? Trump will only make things worse, while some are blinded to that, so much that when everything falls apart they will still think he had nothing to do with that.

Samuel 8- God very strongly warns against mortal governments.

Matthew 6:24- "no man can serve two masters, for verily he will favor one over the other", and 1 Samuel 8 shows God warning that men will end up favoring government over Him.

Acts 5:29-32- "We ought to obey God rather than men." This is pretty clear cut.View attachment 1237131

Classic TDS

 

[jc456]

Every one of Trump's imaginary cases has been tossed for a lack of evidence, or as being "malicious prosecution". If that's your idea of "business is booming", what does crashing and burning utterly and completely look like.

How many Democrats has Trump convicted? How many are being jailed? The answer would be ZERO and ZERO.

Trump tried this the last time he was in office, and the DOJ had to pay out millions of dollars to Trump's victims for violating their rights, and unjust prosecutions. Andrew McCabe now has his full pension from the FBI, and a big wrongful dismissal settlement as well.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/andrew-mccabe-former-fbi-director-pension-lawsuit-settlement-1.6211715

Wash, rinse and repeat for Lisa Page and Peter Strocz who received $2 million for First Amendment violations by Trump.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/26/peter-strzok-lawsuit-settlement-00171498

This round, James Comey, Leticia James, and Fanny Willis all seem to be in a strong position to get millions for malicious prosecution.

None of that happened when Trump went on trial. He was found GUILTY on every charge, based on the EVIDENCE, which was overwhelming.

https://www.npr.org/2024/05/30/g-s1-1848/trump-hush-money-trial-34-counts

Trump didn't even trial to defend the charges of tax and bank fraud. He just allowed the court to make summary judgement. The Appeals Court threw out the penalty imposed at trial but it did NOT reverse the verdict.



Republicans have been the ones who made allegations against Trump, and Republicans provided all of the evidence that convicted him and his cronies on every count.

American banks stopped lending to Trump in 2002. The man is, was and always shall be a criminal.

with you having no crime to accuse him of, weird shit.

 

[jc456]

There was no lawfare against trump. There were investigations, grand jury indictments, and trials during which Don the Orange Clown was afforded every opportunity to defend himself. One trial was even assigned to a judge he appointed, so she threw out the charges.

Conversely, trump's politicized efforts at retribution against perceived enemies have almost all resulted in embarrassing face plants. Disgracing the formerly venerable DoJ.

you said that sober?

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Dragonlady]

with you having no crime to accuse him of, weird shit.

Rape, extortion and tax evasion, for starters. The list is long and disgusting.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Freedom of speech means we should speak the truth where we can communicate with being on topic.

Governments become powerful enough, and then they might do anything they can. Remaining complacent would not be good. They will do so whenever not guarded from that fine? Trump will only make things worse, while some are blinded to that, so much that when everything falls apart they will still think he had nothing to do with that.

Samuel 8- God very strongly warns against mortal governments.

Matthew 6:24- "no man can serve two masters, for verily he will favor one over the other", and 1 Samuel 8 shows God warning that men will end up favoring government over Him.

Acts 5:29-32- "We ought to obey God rather than men." This is pretty clear cut.View attachment 1237131

/----/ "Freedom of speech means we should speak the truth where we can communicate with being on topic."

Nonsense. You just made that up.
Here is the constitutional breakdown:

1. Protection from the Government​

The First Amendment starts with "Congress shall make no law..." This means the right primarily protects you from government interference (federal, state, and local). It does not apply to private entities, such as:

• Private employers.
• Social media platforms.
• Private property owners (e.g., someone kicking you out of their house for what you said).

2. Beyond Just Words (Symbolic Speech)​

The Supreme Court has expanded the definition of "speech" to include conduct that conveys a message. This is known as symbolic speech.

• Examples: Wearing a black armband to protest a war, burning the American flag, or even financial contributions to political campaigns.

 

[jc456]

Rape, extortion and tax evasion, for starters. The list is long and disgusting.

 

[Dragonlady]

Charlie Kirk was a lying piece of shit. Why would I care about anything he said?

He’s lying. Trump admits to raping and assaulting women.

 

[jc456]

Charlie Kirk was a lying piece of shit. Why would I care about anything he said?

He’s lying. Trump admits to raping and assaulting women.

yep, why should facts get in the way of your bullshit, right? hilarious how you shit on yourself.

BTW, you are the kid he was discussing it with, you're that stupid.

 

[IM2]

What's the matter Dems, don't like getting a dose of your own medicine? We're in the business of getting REVENGE on Democrats and business is a booming!

Dems did not do that. Trump broke the law, and he continues breaking the law.

 

[IM2]

yep, why should facts get in the way of your bullshit, right? hilarious how you shit on yourself.

BTW, you are the kid he was discussing it with, you're that stupid.

She is right about KKik. That's why he never debated adults.