The analogy simply does not work; unless the assumption is such that slavery is legal, right, good, worth investing into because some select members of a special interest group receive the benefits of slavery while the slaves pay the price of slavery. So if that is the assumption: slavery is good, then the analogy can work fine.
Government starts and ends at the effective defense is the innocent victims OF SLAVERY (in any form) and if instead there are those who invest in Sugar/Super (involuntary) relationships, then who is the one volunteering to invest in said criminal relationship? Who are among those who are sharing the one idea, that said Sugar/Super (slave relationship) are necessary, good, and good for all, benefiting everyone, or benefiting the slaves, and therefore everyone must invest into this arrangement? All for one criminal arrangement, and one for all?
1. Modern so called Liberals
People who are Marxist/Leninist Criminals seeking to repeat the example offered by Stalin and Bolshevism, the example offered in China by the Mao version of criminal Communism, the Pol Pot Killing Fields in Cambodia, on, and on, cruel and USUAL punishment examples offered time and again when people believe this type of fraud to a point that goes beyond turning back. These people depend upon a fraudulent extortion (extortion hidden behind a so called tax) which moves productive power out of the hands of the producers (slaves) and into the hands of the criminals.
2. Modern so called Conservatives
People who are Money Changers, also known as Monarchs, Aristocrats, Kings, Fascists, and Limited Liability Corporations, the most obvious examples including the Red Coat British Empire, and the Nazi Regime. These people depend upon the same fraudulent extortion combined with a very efficient central banking money monopoly power.
Both groups also depend upon extremely destructive weapons of mass destruction to Suppress Insurrection, Rebellion, and any other forms of efforts by which the slaves work to disconnect from the Sugar/Super Slave connection, so as to then be independent from it.
Both groups Liberal/Conservative also require extremely destructive addictive substances not limited to only Drugs, as the term Bread and Circuses suggest.
As if there were no alternative, both Modern versions of Liberal, and Modern version of Conservatives, invest all the stolen loot they can manage to steal from productive people into maintaining virtually the same thing, having only different people, and different labels, during their turn running the Sugar/Super arrangement which is simply "legalized" slavery, or crime under the color of law.
Within two very significant periods of American history there were people offering voluntary association as the alternative to the Final Solution known as crime under the color of law, or in allegory: Sugar/Super Arranged "Cooperation."
1.
The patriots agreeing with the Declaration of Independence and the written form known as federation. The proponents of voluntary federation were called "Anti" federalists by the Liberal/Conservative group of that time period who falsely called themselves the Federalist Party. The Federalist Party was made up of slave traders and central banking criminals.
2.
Just before the Civil War, after the Democrat-Republican Party worked to reestablish something similar to a true federation (unfortunately the fraudulent Constitution was in place to "legalize" slavery and thereby preventing much reform, and thereby ensuring a Civil War) a time existed that included what was called Wild Cat Banking; which is code for Free Market Banking, true capitalism, in Liberty. During that time period those who picked up where the falsely named Anti-Federalists left off were called Anarchists.
The word choice "Anarchist" was as poor a choice of labels as was the poor choices to call the criminal slave traders and central bankers Federalists, and call the federalists "Anti." The power the criminals exercise on false advertising through controlled media is not new, it was the rule not the exception during the Revolutionary Period, and it was the rule, not the exception during the time period leading up to the so called Civil War (having nothing to do with civility, or civilization, or civil order).
So the idea (if this is the idea) that involuntary association (slave/master, or Sugar/Super) is as necessary, as inevitable, as beneficial, as air, so everyone must invest into such crime, is demonstrably false when looking at the obvious alternatives offered in actual history.
When people are not forced to give up their productive economic wealth, at the point of production, meaning those who produce are those who originally own, control, have, hold, save, command, for investment, for consumption, for themselves, or for charity, DO NOT have said wealth stolen and used by criminals (with false badges) to steal more, and that sets up what became known as free markets in Liberty, or the original ideas behind the word capitalism.
Those who then have that purchasing power are those then able to invest in producing more for less at their locations. That sets up a classification of people who are called entrepreneurs and a greater number of entrepreneurs are ensured when their wealth is not stolen from them by that classification of people known as "politicians" (Super). That sets up an increase in demand for another classification of people called laborers. The increase in entrepreneurs, each individual one demanding laborers who expand the productive capacity of the specific business started by the entrepreneurs, places our world back to a right-side-up world.
That was explained well enough in that time period during the Revolutionary War era, and that was also explained very well during that Wild Cat Banking era leading up to the so called Civil War: as the following example proves beyond a reasonable doubt for those seeking useful knowledge: NOT for those seeking a new lie to replace the old lies that have already worn out their effectiveness.
Benjamin Tucker - State Socialism and Anarchism
First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency. It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they have property which they do not desire to convert into money by sale, a bank will take it as collateral for a loan of a certain proportion of its market value at less than one per cent. discount. If they have no property, but are industrious, honest, and capable, they will generally be able to get their individual notes endorsed by a sufficient number of known and solvent parties; and on such business paper they will be able to get a loan at a bank on similarly favorable terms. Thus interest will fall at a blow. The banks will really not be lending capital at all, but will be doing business on the capital of their customers, the business consisting in an exchange of the known and widely available credits of the banks for the unknown and unavailable, but equality good, credits of the customers and a charge therefor of less than one per cent., not as interest for the use of capital, but as pay for the labor of running the banks. This facility of acquiring capital will give an unheard of impetus to business, and consequently create an unprecedented demand for labor, – a demand which will always be in excess of the supply, directly to the contrary of the present condition of the labor market. Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise. Labor will then be in a position to dictate its wages, and will thus secure its natural wage, its entire product. Thus the same blow that strikes interest down will send wages up. But this is not all. Down will go profits also. For merchants, instead of buying at high prices on credit, will borrow money of the banks at less than one per cent., buy at low prices for cash, and correspondingly reduce the prices of their goods to their customers. And with the rest will go house-rent. For no one who can borrow capital at one per cent. with which to build a house of his own will consent to pay rent to a landlord at a higher rate than that. Such is the vast claim made by Proudhon and Warren as to the results of the simple abolition of the money monopoly.
That ties in with this topic in this way:
Sugar people (those wanting to be independent) are enslaved by the Central Banking Fraud (now The FED) combined with the Extortion Racket (now IRS) as potential entrepreneurs (who would then demand laborers) whose potential to be entrepreneurs is stolen by the Super people at the IRS/FED counterfeit government.
Sugar people knowable as laborers (who would command a capitalist price increase as more entrepreneurs fight over a diminishing supply of scarce laborers) are as enslaved by the criminal (Super) counterfeit government agents in that form knowable as Extortion and Fraud, or crime under the color of law, or involuntary taxation (creating a demand for) counterfeit money. The FED creates a counterfeit dollar, and the IRS demands payment in counterfeit dollars; thereby exposing the relationship required for both Super Modern Liberals and Conservatives feeding from the same criminal trough.
End the IRS, end the FED, and each State competes with each other State, for entrepreneurs, and laborers, for their business in their State, and the only job the voluntary federation has is ensuring the free flow of the people, so as to eliminate those Suger/Super slave/masters through voluntary market forces.
That is explained well enough in the following words:
Reclaiming the American Revolution The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy William Watkins 9781403963031 Amazon.com Books
Quote:______________________________________
Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.
Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state.
Without competition from other units of government, the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely.
_____________________________________________
Those insisting on Master/Slave arrangements are criminals, the do not obey moral laws, they issue and enforce criminal orders. Expecting them to give up their criminal power, once they steal it, is precisely what they may want their slaves to think.
So...the prostitutes no longer have a pimp forcing them into having only two evil "choices," to sell their soul to pimp A or pimp B based upon which pimp abused them less. Instead of that (might makes right) relationship there are voluntary relationships instead as former prostitutes command their own choice among entrepreneurs who fight over each other to pay the former prostitutes a higher wage if the former prostitutes would pick the higher paying entrepreneur to work along side, rather than having a counterfeit employer treat the laborer as if the laborer where his, or her, prostitute.
This is not that hard to grasp. Anyone running a business right now, or any laborer running a labor-for-sale business right now, can look at their so called tax liabilities closely, add the sales tax, the excise tax, the import tax, the export tax, the inflation tax, the city tax, the county tax, the state tax, and the big old' IRS extortion racket tax, and imagine how many people you would employ, inspire, fund, give, were those units of purchasing power yours to invest, save, squander, gamble, consume, enjoy, employ, or burn, rather than having the same units you earned used to steal more from you. Now add your "contributions" to the 300 million or so other "contributors" in these states united federally (voluntarily) and what picture comes to mind?
U.S. National Debt Clock Real Time
Why are so many people turning to this or that form of prostitution?
Do you need a map?
