Does the Quran contain hate speech?

[irosie91]

What do you think?

Why do you ask?

I ask because, I want to know if we can say what the Quran says on Facebook.

Dude. This isn't Facebook. Go ask Facebook if you are on urgent need of knowledge. No need to troll here and get the Islamophobes all excited.

Coyote makes an EXCELLENT point. Just MENTION of the Koran is dangerous. My very own hubby was born in a shariah shit hole (long ago) People like him do not so much as say the word "koran" I do have a copy, but I have to hide it because he would GET RID OF IT FAST. In the country of his birth if a jew touched a koran, that act would instigate a pogrom against the entire village. Coyote is properly cautious. Facebook is very cautious too. I don't know why she COOPERATES with the ban on "koran" talk.
This is supposed to be a messageboard with adherence to THE FIRST AMENDMENT of the USA CONSTITUTION

 

[JoeB131]

Yes, of course it does.

It is a supremacist, totalitarian doctrine predicated on replicating itself until nothing else remains.

As opposed to Christianity? You know, which overran Europe (the Dark Ages were a Faith Based Iniative) the Americas, Africa and Australia...

Hey, check out this list of the largest genocides and mass killings. You have to go pretty far down to find Muslims.

List of genocides - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of anthropogenic disasters by death toll - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[irosie91]

Yes, of course it does.

It is a supremacist, totalitarian doctrine predicated on replicating itself until nothing else remains.

As opposed to Christianity? You know, which overran Europe (the Dark Ages were a Faith Based Iniative) the Americas, Africa and Australia...

Hey, check out this list of the largest genocides and mass killings. You have to go pretty far down to find Muslims.

List of genocides - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of anthropogenic disasters by death toll - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

the information you cite is incomplete. IN FACT--historically----the most comprehensive genocides have ACTUALLY been accomplished by muslims AND COUNTING.

 

[Likkmee]

What do you think?

Yes ..much

So does the OT but Jews have had a “reformation “

??? Free real estate for all ? Rent free pawn shops ?

 

[JoeB131]

the information you cite is incomplete. IN FACT--historically----the most comprehensive genocides have ACTUALLY been accomplished by muslims AND COUNTING.

Not really. The most comprehensive genocides were against Native Americans after Columbus and Jews by Hitler.

And those were done by- Christians. Because Jesus done love him some genocide.

 

[irosie91]

Yes, of course it does.

It is a supremacist, totalitarian doctrine predicated on replicating itself until nothing else remains.

As opposed to Christianity? You know, which overran Europe (the Dark Ages were a Faith Based Iniative) the Americas, Africa and Australia...

Hey, check out this list of the largest genocides and mass killings. You have to go pretty far down to find Muslims.

List of genocides - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of anthropogenic disasters by death toll - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

the information you cite is incomplete. IN FACT--historically----the most comprehensive genocides have ACTUALLY been accomplished by muslims AND COUNTING.

well sunni----the discussion hinges NOT on the argument whether or not GENGHIS KHAN was
"REALLY" a muslim-----but about whether his minions were AND ARE. Try to face facts

 

[irosie91]

the information you cite is incomplete. IN FACT--historically----the most comprehensive genocides have ACTUALLY been accomplished by muslims AND COUNTING.

Not really. The most comprehensive genocides were against Native Americans after Columbus and Jews by Hitler.

And those were done by- Christians. Because Jesus done love him some genocide.

wrong again----for COMPREHENSIVE genocide----see islam. What happened to the "OTHER" people in saudi arabia and lots of other countries? There were, once upon a time-----even christians and jews in SOMALIA. As to the genocides of Indians----the numbers of very questionable-----unless you imagine that the Island of Manhattan was as populated at it is today

 

[JoeB131]

wrong again----for COMPREHENSIVE genocide----see islam. What happened to the "OTHER" people in saudi arabia and lots of other countries?

They converted. But as long as you've brought up the subject.

In the Middle East, you will still find Mandians, Zoroasterians, Samaritans, Ba'hai, Yazidis, Druze who have survived for centuries living side by side with Muslims..

Meanwhile in Europe, you won't find a single worshiper of Zeus, Odin, etc. Nor will you find any worshipers of Quezacoatl or Viracocha today. The Spanish wiped them all out.

As to the genocides of Indians----the numbers of very questionable-----unless you imagine that the Island of Manhattan was as populated at it is today

Actually, it was. Before the Europeans started unleashing their plagues upon the Americas, they had a pretty advanced civilization called the Mississippian that built mounds and had a very extensive trade network. They were completely wiped out by 1700.

 

[irosie91]

wrong again----for COMPREHENSIVE genocide----see islam. What happened to the "OTHER" people in saudi arabia and lots of other countries?

They converted. But as long as you've brought up the subject.

In the Middle East, you will still find Mandians, Zoroasterians, Samaritans, Ba'hai, Yazidis, Druze who have survived for centuries living side by side with Muslims..

Meanwhile in Europe, you won't find a single worshiper of Zeus, Odin, etc. Nor will you find any worshipers of Quezacoatl or Viracocha today. The Spanish wiped them all out.

As to the genocides of Indians----the numbers of very questionable-----unless you imagine that the Island of Manhattan was as populated at it is today

Actually, it was. Before the Europeans started unleashing their plagues upon the Americas, they had a pretty advanced civilization called the Mississippian that built mounds and had a very extensive trade network. They were completely wiped out by 1700.

as to Yazidis, samaritans, zoroastrians etc living
"side by side" with muslims it is clear that you have
not been around------such people do not live SIDE BY
SIDE with muslims in muslim majority lands. They survived as tiny remnants of survivors by STAYING AWAY----something like the condition of cultural Indians in North and South america. "unleashing
plagues" ------who unleashed plagues in Europe?---
who "unleashed" covid 19? Who "unleashed"
syphilis?

 

[irosie91]

wrong again----for COMPREHENSIVE genocide----see islam. What happened to the "OTHER" people in saudi arabia and lots of other countries?

They converted. But as long as you've brought up the subject.

In the Middle East, you will still find Mandians, Zoroasterians, Samaritans, Ba'hai, Yazidis, Druze who have survived for centuries living side by side with Muslims..

Meanwhile in Europe, you won't find a single worshiper of Zeus, Odin, etc. Nor will you find any worshipers of Quezacoatl or Viracocha today. The Spanish wiped them all out.

As to the genocides of Indians----the numbers of very questionable-----unless you imagine that the Island of Manhattan was as populated at it is today

Actually, it was. Before the Europeans started unleashing their plagues upon the Americas, they had a pretty advanced civilization called the Mississippian that built mounds and had a very extensive trade network. They were completely wiped out by 1700.

they were hunters and gatherers and corn growers------with a tiny population that became extinct----there was no organized genocide against the Indian people of Manhattan Island. "pretty advanced"----all human societies are "pretty advanced" based on the "pretty
advanced" human brain. There is no question that the europeans who invaded the americas created big problems for the native people especially in places in which christianity was imposed on them which was COMPREHENSIVE in South America but only parts of
North America. The "plagues" are natural phenomena. The greatest problem the europeans of north america created was alteration in the environment of the native population

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I have read the entire Quran, yes it contains hate speech. All of it is hate speech.

 

[irosie91]

wrong again----for COMPREHENSIVE genocide----see islam. What happened to the "OTHER" people in saudi arabia and lots of other countries?

They converted. But as long as you've brought up the subject.

In the Middle East, you will still find Mandians, Zoroasterians, Samaritans, Ba'hai, Yazidis, Druze who have survived for centuries living side by side with Muslims..

Meanwhile in Europe, you won't find a single worshiper of Zeus, Odin, etc. Nor will you find any worshipers of Quezacoatl or Viracocha today. The Spanish wiped them all out.

As to the genocides of Indians----the numbers of very questionable-----unless you imagine that the Island of Manhattan was as populated at it is today

Actually, it was. Before the Europeans started unleashing their plagues upon the Americas, they had a pretty advanced civilization called the Mississippian that built mounds and had a very extensive trade network. They were completely wiped out by 1700.

they were hunters and gatherers ------with a tiny population

 

[JoeB131]

they were hunters and gatherers and corn growers------with a tiny population that became extinct-

The population of the Americas weren't "tiny", and they weren't "hunter-gatherers". They had a fairly advanced civilization. so advanced that when people in the 19th century started digging up the Mounds, they did all sorts of speculation as to how these must have been built by white people.

Of course, after the plagues and genocide, they were reduced to hunter-gatherer, and even then, the White Man kept killing them, even wiping out the Buffalo to deprive them of a food source.

 

[irosie91]

they were hunters and gatherers and corn growers------with a tiny population that became extinct-

The population of the Americas weren't "tiny", and they weren't "hunter-gatherers". They had a fairly advanced civilization. so advanced that when people in the 19th century started digging up the Mounds, they did all sorts of speculation as to how these must have been built by white people.

Of course, after the plagues and genocide, they were reduced to hunter-gatherer, and even then, the White Man kept killing them, even wiping out the Buffalo to deprive them of a food source.

you are confused.

 

[JoeB131]

you are confused.

No confusion at all, if Space Aliens came down and studied our history, they'd conclude Christians are the biggest sociopaths on the planet... and they'd be right.

 

[ninja007]

Yes, of course it does.

It is a supremacist, totalitarian doctrine predicated on replicating itself until nothing else remains.

As opposed to Christianity? You know, which overran Europe (the Dark Ages were a Faith Based Iniative) the Americas, Africa and Australia...

Hey, check out this list of the largest genocides and mass killings. You have to go pretty far down to find Muslims.

List of genocides - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of anthropogenic disasters by death toll - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

i guessed you missed the new testament. Christians are not violent in the least, while muslims are today and always will be.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

they were hunters and gatherers and corn growers------with a tiny population that became extinct-

The population of the Americas weren't "tiny", and they weren't "hunter-gatherers". They had a fairly advanced civilization. so advanced that when people in the 19th century started digging up the Mounds, they did all sorts of speculation as to how these must have been built by white people.

Of course, after the plagues and genocide, they were reduced to hunter-gatherer, and even then, the White Man kept killing them, even wiping out the Buffalo to deprive them of a food source.

So advanced that not one tribe developed the wheel or advanced as far as the bronze age.

 

[irosie91]

they were hunters and gatherers and corn growers------with a tiny population that became extinct-

The population of the Americas weren't "tiny", and they weren't "hunter-gatherers". They had a fairly advanced civilization. so advanced that when people in the 19th century started digging up the Mounds, they did all sorts of speculation as to how these must have been built by white people.

Of course, after the plagues and genocide, they were reduced to hunter-gatherer, and even then, the White Man kept killing them, even wiping out the Buffalo to deprive them of a food source.

So advanced that not one tribe developed the wheel or advanced as far as the bronze age.

eventually they would have become literate and then they would have moved ahead

 

[JoeB131]

i guessed you missed the new testament. Christians are not violent in the least, while muslims are today and always will be.

Naw, man, I didn't miss the New Testament, Christians did.

In the 2000 years since we've had the burning of witches, crusades, inquisitions, sectarians wars, imperialism, colonization and genocides.

 

[JoeB131]

So advanced that not one tribe developed the wheel or advanced as far as the bronze age.

Why would they need to? The Maya, the Aztecs, the Incas all had very advanced civilizations without those things, as did the Mound Builders.

Wheels and gunpowder do not make you more civilized.