Nah, the stupidity here is you being unable to grasp that the difference between a log10( ), log2( ) or ln( ) is just a linear scaling factor, so it doesn't freakin' matter.The stupidity here is we use natural logs in natural sciences ... log base e ... Euler's number ≈ 2.71 ...
Yes, liberals really are the only people here who can grasp basic math.
Sure it does. It works _now_. No one ever claimed it worked for all of earth's climate over all of earth's history. That was just something kooky that you made up.Worse ... the "3ºC increase for every CO2 doubling" doesn't work ...