Does Donald Trump want to win the climate debate, or trust Jeff Sessions again?

[justoffal]

No bubba,” glacial” is an adjective for the type of ice that forms glaciers, which is a noun. Glacial ice is correct. It doesn’t matter where the land masses are, more Snow from fresh water will accumulate on them and form Snow ice than in the open ocean. It’s harder for ice to form as sea ice because of the salt content of ocean water. That’s why there is much more SNOW ICE.
As far as the Arctic circle and land masses there are concerned, it’s warming faster in the Arctic than anywhere else in earth and why there is LESS snow ice forming in the Artic circle land masses.
This is basic shit and all your questions are from ignorance of Jr High science…Geesus.

Yes the Arctic is entering its natural cycle of less ice cover like it has dozens of times before. Why would you want to interrupt that?

 

[justoffal]

Yours is a conspiracy theory. Hilarious. You can’t name one institute of higher learning ANYWHERE inthe world with a scince department that doesn’t think you denier bubbas are FOS. Name one, just one. Oh, just like Trump actually won the election, covid will be gone in the spring and Hillary is going to jail. Just another fraud to add to the frauds of the gop.

When Copernicus told the scientific world of his time that the Sun was actually at the center of the Galaxy they threatened to execute him.

 

[Dagosa]

Yes the Arctic is entering its natural cycle of less ice cover like it has dozens of times before. Why would you want to interrupt that?

You are confused, again. The Arctic is not the major source of glacial ice. You do know the difference don’t you ?

 

[Dagosa]

When Copernicus told the scientific world of his time that the Sun was actually at the center of the Galaxy they threatened to execute him.

So, you’re Copernicus now ? No bubba, the science at that time did not say the sun was the center of the universe. You’re confused, precursors to Trump supporters did. You know, religious zealots.

 

[Dagosa]

Yes the Arctic is entering its natural cycle of less ice cover like it has dozens of times before. Why would you want to interrupt that?

Amazing how you answer a post without even reading it.

 

[EMH]

We had seen temperatures increase in a pretty steady trendline each year.

No we haven't. FUDGE is not DATA.

 

[Dagosa]

No we haven't. FUDGE is not DATA.

You’re still pretending you can’t read an article.

 

[EMH]

When it’s backed by every climate research facility in the world, it’s real. Don’t fool yourself. The uneducated are susceptible to made up shit, the educated are actually right.

Dag's ability in science is the same as this entity...

 

[EMH]

Yes the Arctic is entering its natural cycle of less ice cover like it has dozens of times before. Why would you want to interrupt that?

The Arctic Ocean is growing. That's what is causing "decline" in sea ice, but it won't all vanish because Greenland and Ellesmere are still in ICE AGE.

 

[EMH]

You’re still pretending you can’t read an article.

This individual has NO IDEA what is the difference between DATA and FUDGE....

NONE...

 

[EMH]

The Arctic is not the major source of glacial ice

Two million years ago, Greenland was completely green. What caused it to go into ice age?

 

[EMH]

My favorite was the old climate change denier shtick that the 'temperature hadn't increased in 14 years'. It was a hard tell that you were dealing with someone profound dishonest.

We had seen temperatures increase in a pretty steady trendline each year....until 1998. That year was unprecedented outlier and broke every record we had for high temperatures. In 1999, temperatures returned to the ascending trendline.

So, climate change deniers would use the outlier as their baseline. An act of dishonesty akin to trying to measure the average height of Americans and using Shaquille O'Neal as your baseline. So when 2000 was higher than 1999, 1997, 1996 and one of the hottest tempatures per year, they'd insist there was no climate change....because 1998 was still higher.

This lasted until about 2013 or so. When the trendline caught up with that massive temperature spike and outlier in 1998. Now AVERAGE temperatures is higher than this massive outlier.

And yet you'll still see, every so often, climate change deniers spew this antiquated, profoundly dishonest line....insisting there's been no temperature increases in 14 years.

Why don't you answer the questions in the OP?

Answer = YOU CAN'T without admitting Co2 does NOTHING

 

[Dagosa]

Two million years ago, Greenland was completely green. What caused it to go into ice age?

Now you’re babbling about something else. You jump from one foolish question to another.

 

[EMH]

Now you’re babbling about something else. You jump from one foolish question to another.

Here's the data.

2 million years ago the top of Greenland was completely green...

A 2-million-year-old ecosystem in Greenland uncovered by environmental DNA - Nature

Analysis of two-million-year-old ancient environmental DNA from the Kap København Formation in North Greenland shows there was an open boreal forest with diverse plant and animal species, of which several taxa have not previously been detected at the site, representing an ecosystem that has no...

www.nature.com

Center of Greenland goes from forest to ice age 400-800k years ago...

Ancient Greenland Was Actually Green

Greenland was once carpeted in lush forests, a new study shows.

www.livescience.com

Vikings farmed the southern tip of Greenland until the 1400s when they were FROZEN OUT...



Greenland FROZE while North America THAWED = how did Co2 do both at the same time?

 

[Burgermeister]

You'll never change a warmist's or vaxxer's mind. Similar mechanism going on. Sometimes it's fun to engage, but it's always a waste of time.

 

[justoffal]

The Arctic Ocean is growing. That's what is causing "decline" in sea ice, but it won't all vanish because Greenland and Ellesmere are still in ICE AGE.

If they're so concerned about it why don't they just pass a law making it illegal for the ice to melt?

 

[justoffal]

You'll never change a warmist's or vaxxer's mind. Similar mechanism going on. Sometimes it's fun to engage, but it's always a waste of time.

"One convinced against his will is of the same opinion still."

 

[justoffal]

This individual has NO IDEA what is the difference between DATA and FUDGE....

NONE...

Personally I like the different types of fudge. Peanut butter is my favorite.

 

[22lcidw]

Now you’re babbling about something else. You jump from one foolish question to another.

It is difficult to believe climate change due to humans because other nations providing Americans, we cheap products are not clean energy intensive. China and India are building coal plants still. Progressives who are in the forefront of anything that is not from the old ways, are living on the oceans and buying properties on the oceans. We have endless dates of the end of the world over this. We have 8 billion people in the world. A century ago, we had 1 billion people. We have a lot of more people living on barrier islands or near it and in flood zones than before. We also have the same in tornado potential areas. So, 2030 is the next end of the world. Around 1970, the then climate change people said Florida would be half under water with a few decades. A TV show even showed Florida on a map that was half the size or so. Sea quest starring Roy Scheider. I can agree that barrier island can lose some of their coastline. Yet we have built as far up as we could in most areas, and some are affected from normal erosion, continental drift. perhaps deconstructing the structures closest to the sand would be mor prudent and not letting the taxpayer pay for any damages to structures is advisable.

 

[EMH]

If they're so concerned about it why don't they just pass a law making it illegal for the ice to melt?

Because there is NO EVIDENCE of an ongoing net ice melt on Earth, none.

NO EVIDENCE OF OCEAN RISE, which is why they cannot show us one single photo of such

And 90% of Earth Ice on Antarctica has been growing the whole time...

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.

Study: Mass gains of Antarctic ice sheet greater than losses - NASA Science

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

science.nasa.gov

the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.



And the fact that Surface Air Pressure is decreasing proves there is NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT since glacier ice is packed to the hilt with compressed air...

Co2 Fraud hasn't fudged all data, surface air pressure for one....

The Co2 FRAUD is run by very lame "climate scientists" who flat out aren't very good at science at all. They are good at lying, fudging data, and censoring truth. But there is data, and it isn't friendly to the Co2 FRAUD, which is why the Co2 FRAUD fudges everything they think they need to...

www.usmessageboard.com

Once again, the "evidence" of an ongoing net ice melt on Earth is 100% pure FUDGED FRAUD.