Does Donald Trump want to win the climate debate, or trust Jeff Sessions again?

[EMH]

Yup. Not only is the water more constantly warmer than the land mass in the Arctic but it contains salt……gee, Every question you asked has been disputed as tripe.
Being a science illiterate who can’t tell the difference between sea ice and glacial ice from snow, means you’re just proud of being a dullard.

What percent of Earth ice is sea ice?

 

[Dagosa]

What percent of Earth ice is sea ice?

What percent if your brain is mush ? You already posted it dufus. You having fun repeating yourself ? Go ahead, give us a number.

 

[EMH]

What percent if your brain is mush ? You already posted it dufus. You having fun repeating yourself ? Go ahead, give us a number.

LOL!!!

LESS THAN 1.5%

Here you are obsessing over sea ice, while you cannot explain why there is NO OCEAN RISE...

 

[Dagosa]

LOL!!!

LESS THAN 1.5%

Here you are obsessing over sea ice, while you cannot explain why there is NO OCEAN RISE...

Dufus, we aren’t obsessing over sea ice idiot. It’s the glacial snow ice that is land mass derived that contains fresh water dumbo. You’re the one with his pants in fire about sea ice . Loss of sea ice does not raise the water level dufus. Dufus, it’s glacial ice melting that does….
You’re such a dumbo.

 

[EMH]

Dufus, we aren’t obsessing over sea ice idiot. It’s the glacial snow ice that is land mass derived that contains fresh water dumbo. You’re the one with his pants in fire about sea ice . Loss of sea ice does not raise the water level dufus. Dufus, it’s glacial ice melting that does….
You’re such a dumbo.

You are claiming ocean rise.

Where is the visual evidence of this?

Certainly not the Statue of Liberty, which clearly proves THERE IS NO OCEAN RISE...

 

[Dagosa]

You are claiming ocean rise.

Where is the visual evidence of this?

Certainly not the Statue of Liberty, which clearly proves THERE IS NO OCEAN RISE...

You have none…..not from your stupid pictures. Why don’t you practice literacy and ask a climate research facility dufus. Pretend you’re smart.

 

[EMH]

You have none…..not from your stupid pictures. Why don’t you practice literacy and ask a climate research facility dufus. Pretend you’re smart.

LOL!!!

The Co2 FRAUD cannot show us ONE SINGLE PHOTO of "ocean rise" because

1. there is no ocean rise
2. because there is no ongoing net ice melt
3. because planet Earth is not warming

 

[Dagosa]

LOL!!!

The Co2 FRAUD cannot show us ONE SINGLE PHOTO of "ocean rise" because

1. there is no ocean rise
2. because there is no ongoing net ice melt
3. because planet Earth is not warming

Your photo is stupid., like your posts. Tell MIT your findings. Let’s have a good laugh.

 

[EMH]

Your photo is stupid., like your posts. Tell MIT your findings. Let’s have a good laugh.

MIT is free to answer all of the questions in the OP, but refuses to do so. Ditto for the entire Co2 FRAUD.

This is why you are so scared Trump might ask those questions...

SINCE YOUR Co2 FRAUD SIDE CANNOT ANSWER THEM

 

[Dagosa]

MIT is free to answer all of the questions in the OP, but refuses to do so. Ditto for the entire Co2 FRAUD.

This is why you are so scared Trump might ask those questions...

SINCE YOUR Co2 FRAUD SIDE CANNOT ANSWER THEM

Go ahead. Show proof that MIT denies climate change.
All your questions and comments are based upon stupidity.

 

[EMH]

1. why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. why can't the Co2 Fraud show us land that is "sinking" from "ocean rise." (land approaching PROF doesn't count)?
4. why is Surface Air Pressure trending down if temperature is going up and there is an ongoing net ice melt?
5. why, if oceans are warming, is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
6. why was highly correlated satellite and balloon data showing no warming in the atmosphere fudged in 2005 to show "warming" that never existed in the actual data?



The Co2 FRAUD cannot answer any of them....

 

[Dagosa]

1. why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. why can't the Co2 Fraud show us land that is "sinking" from "ocean rise." (land approaching PROF doesn't count)?
4. why is Surface Air Pressure trending down if temperature is going up and there is an ongoing net ice melt?
5. why, if oceans are warming, is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
6. why was highly correlated satellite and balloon data showing no warming in the atmosphere fudged in 2005 to show "warming" that never existed in the actual data?



The Co2 FRAUD cannot answer any of them....

Answered every question dufus.

 

[Dagosa]

1. why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. why can't the Co2 Fraud show us land that is "sinking" from "ocean rise." (land approaching PROF doesn't count)?
4. why is Surface Air Pressure trending down if temperature is going up and there is an ongoing net ice melt?
5. why, if oceans are warming, is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
6. why was highly correlated satellite and balloon data showing no warming in the atmosphere fudged in 2005 to show "warming" that never existed in the actual data?



The Co2 FRAUD cannot answer any of them....

Did you have a good time typing out all those questions with such poor punctuation ? At least pretend you aren’t senile.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Twisting the words for a pathetic point.

Daily fluctuations do not matter.

The 7 decade chart shows SAP going DOWN.

WHY?


Chosen Co2 LIAR will not answer, because she can't....

Daily fluctuations do not matter.

Right. SAP changes don't matter, if they disprove your claim.

The 7 decade chart shows SAP going DOWN.

WHY?

Don't know. Don't care.

 

[EMH]

Daily fluctuations do not matter.

Right. SAP changes don't matter, if they disprove your claim.

This is the same BS your side uses to explain why there is no breakout in cane activity = wind shear.

Sorry, wind shear patterns, high and low pressure weather systems are weather, not climate, and while they affect daily readings, they are both washed out by the 70+ year charts.

The 7 decade chart shows SAP going DOWN.

WHY?

Don't know. Don't care.

The overwhelmingly dominant factor in SURFACE AIR PRESSURE is Earth's total ice content, today around 9 million cubic miles.

The SAP is, in fact, complete PROOF that there is NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT, but rather just the opposite, that Antarctic ice has been growing all along.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The overwhelmingly dominant factor in SURFACE AIR PRESSURE is Earth's total ice content, today around 9 million cubic miles.

Prove it.

This is the same BS your side uses to explain why there is no breakout in cane activity

I'm on the side mocking the green energy idiocy.
The side that's pointing out your mental illness.

 

[Dagosa]

This is the same BS your side uses to explain why there is no breakout in cane activity = wind shear.

Sorry, wind shear patterns, high and low pressure weather systems are weather, not climate, and while they affect daily readings, they are both washed out by the 70+ year charts.






The overwhelmingly dominant factor in SURFACE AIR PRESSURE is Earth's total ice content, today around 9 million cubic miles.

The SAP is, in fact, complete PROOF that there is NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT, but rather just the opposite, that Antarctic ice has been growing all along.

Bullshit. Give a source that says Antartica ice has been “ growing” dufus. The rest of your post is woo woo.

 

[Dagosa]

This is the same BS your side uses to explain why there is no breakout in cane activity = wind shear.

Sorry, wind shear patterns, high and low pressure weather systems are weather, not climate, and while they affect daily readings, they are both washed out by the 70+ year charts.






The overwhelmingly dominant factor in SURFACE AIR PRESSURE is Earth's total ice content, today around 9 million cubic miles.

The SAP is, in fact, complete PROOF that there is NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT, but rather just the opposite, that Antarctic ice has been growing all along.

You’re just another fraud like Chem Engineer…

 

[EMH]

Bullshit. Give a source that says Antartica ice has been “ growing” dufus. The rest of your post is woo woo.

LOL!!!

Why aren't oceans "rising" then???

Antarctica is 90% of Earth ice.

We went to court in 2007...

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.

=======================================================================

• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.

================================================================================

• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

 

[EMH]

Study: Mass gains of Antarctic ice sheet greater than losses - NASA Science

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

science.nasa.gov

the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.



Antarctica's ice has grown every year for millions of years. The "Warmers" cannot show us any LIQUID WATER on Antarctica, but claim it is "melting" anyway. The SURFACE AIR PRESSURE proves there is NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT meaning AA is increasing.