Does Donald Trump want to win the climate debate, or trust Jeff Sessions again?

97% of the ice is over land bubba…..because that’s where snow accumulates and compresses into snow ice

Actually we call it GLACIER, but you are actually correct, GLACIER ICE forms ON LAND. Land moves. 97% of Earth ice on the two land masses closest to the poles...
 
Are you arguing that increasing temperature does not increases surface air pressure?

Are you arguing that adding gas to the atmosphere does not increase surface air pressure?

If you suck all air out of the atmosphere, does that increase or decrease surface air pressure....

Are you arguing that increasing temperature does not increases surface air pressure?

I told you already. Did you forget? Is it dementia? TBI? Is it the Jewish mind control beam?
 
I told you already.


No, actually, you have repeatedly chickened out from a specific answer on temperature regarding SAP....

One more try...

Does increasing atmospheric temperature increase SAP?
 
Actually we call it GLACIER, but you are actually correct, GLACIER ICE forms ON LAND. Land moves. 97% of Earth ice on the two land masses closest to the poles...
No bubba,” glacial” is an adjective for the type of ice that forms glaciers, which is a noun. Glacial ice is correct. It doesn’t matter where the land masses are, more Snow from fresh water will accumulate on them and form Snow ice than in the open ocean. It’s harder for ice to form as sea ice because of the salt content of ocean water. That’s why there is much more SNOW ICE.
As far as the Arctic circle and land masses there are concerned, it’s warming faster in the Arctic than anywhere else in earth and why there is LESS snow ice forming in the Artic circle land masses.
This is basic shit and all your questions are from ignorance of Jr High science…Geesus.
 
No, actually, you have repeatedly chickened out from a specific answer on temperature regarding SAP....

One more try...

Does increasing atmospheric temperature increase SAP?
You’re making a totally bogus discussion. Atmospheric temps are NOT taken because they are so variable .
We take temperatures at or near the surface where HUMANS RESIDE. We measure CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere, not temperature. Stop conflating the two.
 
No, actually, you have repeatedly chickened out from a specific answer on temperature regarding SAP....

One more try...

Does increasing atmospheric temperature increase SAP?
Ha ha…
You deniers never discuss what AGW is doing to our fresh water supply. Only 3% of the total water us fresh water. More than two thirds are frozen glacial snow ice and THE REST in underground water. The glacial ice is melting and running into the oceans to be mixed with the brine in sea water. The ocean rise also contaminates
Ground water supplies. The decreasing fresh water supplies makes irrigation more problematic for farming forcing more and more massive immigration problems ….all over the world, not just here.
 
No, actually, you have repeatedly chickened out from a specific answer on temperature regarding SAP....

One more try...

Does increasing atmospheric temperature increase SAP?
Remind us again why MIT is lying about AGW.
 
You deniers never discuss what AGW is doing to our fresh water supply


LOL!!!

AGW is doing precisely nothing to the fresh water supply since there is no warming. What is causing the fires is too many humans consuming too much of finite land based fresh water supply, causing plant life to dry out.


glacial ice is melting

Then surely you can show us a PHOTO of "ocean rise," but you can't because there is no ocean rise because there is no ongoing net ice melt on Earth now.


Remind us again why MIT is lying about AGW.


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
 
It’s harder for ice to form as sea ice because of the salt content of ocean water


OK, never mind the temperature of the water.... LOL!!!


Atmospheric temps are NOT taken because they are so variable


Hilarious. You are the "Kamala Harris of climate science."


We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons, both of which showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere in highly correlated fashion, so in 2005, the Co2 FRAUD FUDGED BOTH with laughable excuses.

THE ACTUAL DATA FROM THE ATMOSPHERE SHOWED NO WARMING IN THE ATMOSPHERE FOR DECADES WHILE Co2 CONTENT WAS INCREASING....


EVERYONE NOTE NBC has now REMOVED THE STORY from the link, the last link I can find to admit the truth of the actual data

NO WARMING IN THE ATMOSPHERE
 
Sometimes.


Typical for "climate science." Whatever happens, the Co2 FRAUD is responsible.

Co2 FRAUD causes more rain, but also causes droughts, according to Toddster's heroes....

The truth is that increasing atmospheric temperature definitely and always does increase surface air pressure all else constant.
 
Typical for "climate science." Whatever happens, the Co2 FRAUD is responsible.

Co2 FRAUD causes more rain, but also causes droughts, according to Toddster's heroes....

The truth is that increasing atmospheric temperature definitely and always does increase surface air pressure all else constant.

The truth is that increasing atmospheric temperature definitely and always does increase surface air pressure all else constant.

Except when it decreases surface air pressure.
 
The truth is that increasing atmospheric temperature definitely and always does increase surface air pressure all else constant.

Except when it decreases surface air pressure.


And your "documentation" of that is.....
 
Go for it!!!

The most basic change in pressure is the twice daily rise and fall due to the heat from the sun. Each day, the pressure is at its lowest around 4 a.m./p.m., and at its highest around 10 a.m./p.m. The magnitude of the daily cycle is greatest near the equator, decreasing toward the poles.

 
15th post
The most basic change in pressure is the twice daily rise and fall due to the heat from the sun. Each day, the pressure is at its lowest around 4 a.m./p.m., and at its highest around 10 a.m./p.m. The magnitude of the daily cycle is greatest near the equator, decreasing toward the poles.



Sun warms gas, pressure increases... duh.... Sun goes down, gas cools, pressure goes down... duh...

The daily fluctuation from the Sun is not responsible for the long term down trend in SAP documented here...




Comparison of the interannual variation in sea level and air pressure at sea level, and the 5-year moving average for the period 1963–2005.


Comparison of the interannual variation in sea level and air pressure at sea level, and the 5-year moving average for the period 1963–2005.​




So WHY is SURFACE AIR PRESSURE GOING DOWN???


Co2 FRAUD cannot answer that....
 
Sun warms gas, pressure increases... duh.... Sun goes down, gas cools, pressure goes down... duh...

The daily fluctuation from the Sun is not responsible for the long term down trend in SAP documented here...




Comparison of the interannual variation in sea level and air pressure at sea level, and the 5-year moving average for the period 1963–2005.


Comparison of the interannual variation in sea level and air pressure at sea level, and the 5-year moving average for the period 1963–2005.​




So WHY is SURFACE AIR PRESSURE GOING DOWN???


Co2 FRAUD cannot answer that....

Sun warms gas, pressure increases... duh.... Sun goes down, gas cools, pressure goes down... duh...

Or in this case, the Sun is still up, the gas is still warm, pressure goes down.

So WHY is SURFACE AIR PRESSURE GOING DOWN???

You should investigate!
Keep me posted. Your discovery is so interesting!!!
 
Sun warms gas, pressure increases... duh.... Sun goes down, gas cools, pressure goes down... duh...

Or in this case, the Sun is still up, the gas is still warm, pressure goes down.

So WHY is SURFACE AIR PRESSURE GOING DOWN???

You should investigate!
Keep me posted. Your discovery is so interesting!!!


Twisting the words for a pathetic point.

Daily fluctuations do not matter.

The 7 decade chart shows SAP going DOWN.

WHY?


Chosen Co2 LIAR will not answer, because she can't....
 
Last edited:
OK, never mind the temperature of the water.... LOL!!!





Hilarious. You are the "Kamala Harris of climate science."


We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons, both of which showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere in highly correlated fashion, so in 2005, the Co2 FRAUD FUDGED BOTH with laughable excuses.

THE ACTUAL DATA FROM THE ATMOSPHERE SHOWED NO WARMING IN THE ATMOSPHERE FOR DECADES WHILE Co2 CONTENT WAS INCREASING....


EVERYONE NOTE NBC has now REMOVED THE STORY from the link, the last link I can find to admit the truth of the actual data

NO WARMING IN THE ATMOSPHERE
Yup. Not only is the water more constantly warmer than the land mass in the Arctic but it contains salt……gee, Every question you asked has been disputed as tripe.
Being a science illiterate who can’t tell the difference between sea ice and glacial ice from snow, means you’re just proud of being a dullard.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom