Does Donald Trump want to win the climate debate, or trust Jeff Sessions again?

LOL!!!

Why aren't oceans "rising" then???

Antarctica is 90% of Earth ice.

We went to court in 2007...


  • The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
  • The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
  • The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
  • The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
  • The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
  • The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
  • The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
  • The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
=======================================================================
  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
================================================================================
  • The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
  • The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.
Mrcnewsbusters is a conservative media hit job.
Media Research Center(MRC) is an American conservative content analysisand media watchdog group based in Herndon, Virginia, and founded in 1987 by L. Brent Bozell III.[2]

Hilarious…..Bozell is no scientist and they are unqualified to comment on any work of Al Gore. Al Gore uses science from NASA and other climate science institutes. Nothing has been disproved.
 
Mrcnewsbusters is a conservative media hit job.
Media Research Center(MRC) is an American conservative content analysisand media watchdog group based in Herndon, Virginia, and founded in 1987 by L. Brent Bozell III.[2]

Hilarious…..Bozell is no scientist and they are unqualified to comment on any work of Al Gore. Al Gore uses science from NASA and other climate science institutes. Nothing has been disproved.


Um, that is REPORTED about a COURT VERDICT. IT is COURT CERTIFIED TRUTH that YOUR SIDE DID NOT APPEAL...


Antarctic ice growing
no correlation between Co2 and temperature
 
Now is a great time to start asking these questions, Mr. Trump.
 
Um, that is REPORTED about a COURT VERDICT. IT is COURT CERTIFIED TRUTH that YOUR SIDE DID NOT APPEAL...


Antarctic ice growing
no correlation between Co2 and temperature
Nope, it’s being lied about by a conservative rag.
 
Um, that is REPORTED about a COURT VERDICT. IT is COURT CERTIFIED TRUTH that YOUR SIDE DID NOT APPEAL...


Antarctic ice growing
no correlation between Co2 and temperature
Prove it. Give a CLIMATE SCIENCE source….go ahead BS artist.
 
Nope, it’s being lied about by a conservative rag.


LOL!!!

The COURT VERDICT was reported, and you do not like it....
 
Indeed, what this topic demonstrates is that the climate debate is quite easy to win. The Co2 FRAUD has nothing.

The questions in the OP need to be asked. Smashing the Co2 FRAUD's "credibility" is a seriously good option for the Trump campaign.

ALL IT TAKES IS ASKING A FEW QUESTIONS THE CO2 FRAUD CANNOT ANSWER.

It is a tribute to just how corrupt and sold out the Republican Party and the "conservative" media Faux, RAV, OANN etc. are, that NONE will ask the OP questions... because so many are A PART OF THE CO2 FRAUD....
 
LOL!!!

The COURT VERDICT was reported, and you do not like it....
Ah, what court verdict ? The one in your head ? Still no source….other than a conservative rag.
 
Ah, what court verdict ? The one in your head ? Still no source….other than a conservative rag.


British Court 2007 ruling after all evidence presented...



  • The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.

  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
 
British Court 2007 ruling after all evidence presented...



  • The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.

  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
Lies. Newsbuster is a conservative rag…”;a British court rules no such thing dufus.
 
Lies. Newsbuster is a conservative rag…”;a British court rules no such thing dufus.


LOL!!

No evidence to the contrary, just because it is a conservative outlet means... the verdict was not the verdict.

Why didn't Algore appeal?

CHICKEN!!!
 
LOL!!

No evidence to the contrary, just because it is a conservative outlet means... the verdict was not the verdict.

Why didn't Algore appeal?

CHICKEN!!!
No sources….babble. Appeal what ? Your bullshit ?
 
LOL!!!

The COURT VERDICT was reported, and you do not like it....
There was no court “verdict” foolish. That’s a lie by a conservative rag. You can’t quote ANY actual verdict.
 
  • Fake News
Reactions: EMH
There is a personality type who is religiously drawn to the idea that man is creating an apocalypse and must be stopped. They predicably and fanatically respond to the Malthusian crisis of the day is - the population bomb, global cooling, global warming, not wearing masks/getting jabbed, whatever. This crowd is ridiculously easy to manipulate for all kinds of purposes that have nothing to do with the fake crisis.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
All of your gotcha-questions are either outright lies, debunked here many times before, or they're irrelevant to the issue.

That is, they're too stupid even for Trump to use.

My favorite was the old climate change denier shtick that the 'temperature hadn't increased in 14 years'. It was a hard tell that you were dealing with someone profound dishonest.

We had seen temperatures increase in a pretty steady trendline each year....until 1998. That year was unprecedented outlier and broke every record we had for high temperatures. In 1999, temperatures returned to the ascending trendline.

So, climate change deniers would use the outlier as their baseline. An act of dishonesty akin to trying to measure the average height of Americans and using Shaquille O'Neal as your baseline. So when 2000 was higher than 1999, 1997, 1996 and one of the hottest tempatures per year, they'd insist there was no climate change....because 1998 was still higher.

This lasted until about 2013 or so. When the trendline caught up with that massive temperature spike and outlier in 1998. Now AVERAGE temperatures is higher than this massive outlier.

And yet you'll still see, every so often, climate change deniers spew this antiquated, profoundly dishonest line....insisting there's been no temperature increases in 14 years.
 
My favorite was the old climate change denier shtick that the 'temperature hadn't increased in 14 years'. It was a hard tell that you were dealing with someone profound dishonest.

We had seen temperatures increase in a pretty steady trendline each year....until 1998. That year was unprecedented outlier and broke every record we had for high temperatures. In 1999, temperatures returned to the ascending trendline.

So, climate change deniers would use the outlier as their baseline. An act of dishonesty akin to trying to measure the average height of Americans and using Shaquille O'Neal as your baseline. So when 2000 was higher than 1999, 1997, 1996 and one of the hottest tempatures per year, they'd insist there was no climate change....because 1998 was still higher.

This lasted until about 2013 or so. When the trendline caught up with that massive temperature spike and outlier in 1998. Now AVERAGE temperatures is higher than this massive outlier.

And yet you'll still see, every so often, climate change deniers spew this antiquated, profoundly dishonest line....insisting there's been no temperature increases in 14 years.
My favorite example of a reason for the global warming "pause", which happened, was that the heat was hiding at the bottom of the ocean.

The contortions these global warming "scientists" have to make to keep their grants going are hilarious.
 
15th post
There is a personality type who is religiously drawn to the idea that man is creating an apocalypse and must be stopped. They predicably and fanatically respond to the Malthusian crisis of the day is - the population bomb, global cooling, global warming, not wearing masks/getting jabbed, whatever. This crowd is ridiculously easy to manipulate for all kinds of purposes that have nothing to do with the fake crisis.
When it’s backed by every climate research facility in the world, it’s real. Don’t fool yourself. The uneducated are susceptible to made up shit, the educated are actually right.
 
When it’s backed by every climate research facility in the world, it’s real. Don’t fool yourself. The uneducated are susceptible to made up shit, the educated are actually right.
LOL! What do you expect from a "climate research facility"? They all go away once the sham is revealed.
 
LOL! What do you expect from a "climate research facility"? They all go away once the sham is revealed.

Yours is a conspiracy theory. Hilarious. You can’t name one institute of higher learning ANYWHERE inthe world with a scince department that doesn’t think you denier bubbas are FOS. Name one, just one. Oh, just like Trump actually won the election, covid will be gone in the spring and Hillary is going to jail. Just another fraud to add to the frauds of the gop.
 
My favorite example of a reason for the global warming "pause", which happened, was that the heat was hiding at the bottom of the ocean.

The contortions these global warming "scientists" have to make to keep their grants going are hilarious.
Oh, we’re now giving grants to the university of Moscow and China and North Korea ? You still can’t name one that doesn’t think you’re FOS. Keep babbling.
 
Back
Top Bottom