Does Anyone Still Not Understand There is No Such Thing as an Unarmed "Insurrection" Like They Tell You J6 Was?

[scruffy]

A woman is a person who considers herself to be one.

So I can be an aardvark if I consider myself to be one?

That's pretty much the law here.

The law has been entirely nonsensical many times in many places.

What is it there, a woman is a person you consider to be one?

I consider a woman to be a woman, yes.

If she considers herself to be a man trapped inside a woman's body, that's her problem and not mine.

 

[Delldude]

Yet Trump claimed there was no guns in the insurrection.

Triggered you is what you're trying to say?

 

[Modern Messiah]

The dictionary definition of "Insurrection" does not include lethal weapons, Einstein.

So you'll have to do the normal MAGA thing and run with your own definition to fit your cult's worldview.

If you don't like that, tough shit.

You can babble about it all you want.
The American People didn't define it as an insurrection.
Want proof?
312>226
All Swing States
Massive Popular Vote

 

[Delldude]

So you'll have to do the normal MAGA thing and run with your own definition to fit your cult's worldview.

Get a life......

 

[Modern Messiah]

There was nothing “silly” about J6

I agree with you.
Ashli Babbit was murdered in cold blood, shot point blank by capital lieutenant michael byrd.
That is not silly at all.
Thanks for pointing it out.

 

[Modern Messiah]

MAGA lies.

Ashli Babbit was murdered by capital lieutenant michael byrd.
Shot her point blank in the neck.
Is that a MAGA lie?

 

[Modern Messiah]

They don't like dictionaries. Dictionaries are commie. College students use them.

You should look up the word (murder).
That's what capital lieutenant michael byrd committed when he shot Ashli Babbit to death.
She was unarmed as well.

 

[Modern Messiah]

Dictionary Definition​

According to Merriam-Webster:​

Synonyms: uprising, rebellion, revolt, mutiny, sedition.

So, at its core, it’s about a violent or active resistance against authority, especially the state or its institutions.

​

Legal Definition​

Under 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection:​

Key legal elements:

• It involves organized or purposeful action against the U.S. government’s authority or law.
• Includes those who incite, assist, or give aid to such efforts—not just those who physically act.
• Punishment includes fines, imprisonment, and disqualification from public office.

This statute is part of the broader framework of federal sedition and rebellion laws, which include:

• Sedition (18 U.S.C. § 2384)
• Advocating the overthrow of the government (18 U.S.C. § 2385)

---

Summary:​

• In general usage, insurrection means a revolt or violent resistance against authority.
• Legally, it’s a defined federal crime involving action or support of a rebellion against the U.S. government.

***There is no legal requirement that insurrectionists be armed for an act to qualify as an insurrection under U.S. law.

Looking at the Law Again (18 U.S.C. § 2383):​

• The statute does not mention weapons, arms, or armed conflict as a required element.
• What matters is the intent and action to oppose or overthrow lawful authority.
• Courts look at things like:
  • Organization and planning
  • Use of force or violence (armed or not)
  • Targeting of government institutions
  • Interference with the execution of law

Historical Context Confirms This:​

In U.S. history, not all insurrections were armed in the traditional military sense:

Examples of actions that could qualify:​

• Storming a federal building to prevent the certification of an election (even if only a subset were armed).
• Overpowering law enforcement to disrupt government proceedings.
• Coordinated occupation of government facilities.

Legal Nuance:​

The presence of weapons may escalate the severity of the charges (e.g., adding weapons charges or terrorism enhancements), but they are not required to classify the event as an insurrection under 18 U.S.C. § 2383.

january 6 will live on in infamy in American history as the day capital lieutenant michael byrd viscously murdered Ashli Babbit, an unarmed female veteran.
It's quite sad that leftists not only condone this behavior, but defend it as well.
Very shameful.
Not surprising though.
Especially after they celebrated the assassination attempts on President Trump.

 

[LeftofLeft]

The dictionary definition of "Insurrection" does not include lethal weapons, Einstein.

So you'll have to do the normal MAGA thing and run with your own definition to fit your cult's worldview.

If you don't like that, tough shit.

Yet the same mindset insistent on applying the insurrection definition on January 6th doesn’t apply the terrorism definition to all of the Burning, Looting, and Maiming that occurred in US cities in the months leading up to January 6. In fact, some have called those events “peaceful protests” or they blame the police; whereas on January 6, the same people cheered the police for shooting and killing an unarmed suspect.

 

[Modern Messiah]

The fact that people were armed or that they beat police with poles erases the lies in the OP. 1-6 was an insurrection, and no amount of gaslighting changes what happened.

Remember when you leftists went crazy and bombed Tesla dealerships, lit Tesla's on fire and intimidated/attacked Tesla owners because the government was dismantling usaid and all their waste, fraud and abuse.
INSURRECTION!

 

[j-mac]

Yet the same mindset insistent on applying the insurrection definition on January 6th doesn’t apply the terrorism definition to all of the Burning, Looting, and Maiming that occurred in US cities in the months leading up to January 6. In fact, some have called those events “peaceful protests” or they blame the police; whereas on January 6, the same people cheered the police for shooting and killing an unarmed suspect.

If Mac has to refer to the dictionary, he’s already lost.

What happened on J6 was a horrible spectacle brought on by the instigators, and money behind the scenes….We need a true unbiased investigation into this, so the chapter can be closed.

 

[berg80]

- No insurrection in history has ever been unarmed, even slave rebellions fought with pitchforks and machetes. That is because insurrectionists expect to have to hold their gains against usually armed regime forces. Usually superior. You take a parliament chamber, you are not going to have it long once soldiers arrive with Bradleys and machine-guns.

- In insurrections, armed rebel forces, whether they are civilian or rebel military units, usually fight pitched street battles to keep those troops from ever arriving. This could devolve into civil war that last for years.

- Insurrectionists usually take TV and radio stations so they can announce that someone else is in charge.

Already can anyone not see how historically ignorant and lame-brained it is to call J6 an "insurrection" and a tiny handful of rioters "insurrectionists? Is everyone ready to agree that Democrats are the dumbest, most uneducated people on Earth. There is no such thing as an unarmed insurrection.


The Iranian insurrection 1953, tanks outside government buildings
View attachment 1117599

Pathetic attempts to diminish the significance of what happened and trump's role in it will be regarded as such, cuck.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Holy crap, the zillionth attempt to downplay the Insurrection.

Too funny.

How many were charged with insurrection again?

 

[LeftofLeft]

Pathetic attempts to diminish the significance of what happened and trump's role in it will be regarded as such, cuck.

 

[Mac1958]

Pathetic attempts to diminish the significance of what happened and trump's role in it will be regarded as such, cuck.

They've been provided with a full alternate reality for the Insurrection, as they are with everything else.

I had one of them tell me that the video of the violence was actually a Hollywood production.

There is no communicating with them here. This is a group pathology, and the world has seen it before.

 

[LeftofLeft]

They've been provided with a full alternate reality for the Insurrection, as they are with everything else.

I had one of them tell me that the video of the violence was actually a Hollywood production.

There is no communicating with them here. This is a group pathology, and the world has seen it before.

See US Code Section 2383. It explicitly lays out the guidelines for Insurrection as crime in the United States. Who or how many were charged with the crime of Insurrection for their actions on January 6 at the US Capitol?

 

[Mac1958]

Who or how many were charged with the crime of Insurrection for their actions on January 6 at the US Capitol?

None. Zero. Each individual was charged with the specific crimes they committed DURING the Insurrection.

Easier to get a conviction that way.

I've answered that one about 50 times now.

 

[LeftofLeft]

None. Zero. Each individual was charged with the specific crimes they committed DURING the Insurrection.

Easier to get a conviction that way.

I've answered that one about 50 times now.

You can answer it 1,000 times and keep coming up empty. If no one was charged with the crime of Insurrection, then what court or legal body deemed this event an insurrection?

Calling this an Insurrection or an attempted Insurrection is just a fantasy.

 

[Mac1958]

You can answer it 1,000 times and keep coming up empty. If no one was charged with the crime of Insurrection, then what court or legal body deemed this event an insurrection?

Calling this an Insurrection or an attempted Insurrection is just a fantasy.

I surely wouldn't try to change the mind of someone like you. I merely answered your question.

Anyway, as far as I know, you're free to call it a "banana" if you want to!

Meanwhile, many of us (from across the political spectrum, of course) will call it The Insurrection. If you don't like that, you'll just have to get over it.

 

[Modern Messiah]

None. Zero. Each individual was charged with the specific crimes they committed DURING the Insurrection.

Easier to get a conviction that way.

I've answered that one about 50 times now.

So they convicted nowon of insurrection.
Let me ask you.
If there is no lightning, can you really call it a lightning storm?
If you truly want to go by the letter of the law then there was no insurrection.